Abstract
Context is everywhere in the human social and cognitive spheres but it is often implicit and unnoticed. However, when one is involved in trying to understand and model the social and cognitive realms context becomes an important factor. This paper is an analysis of the role and effects of context on social simulation and a call for it to be squarely faced by the social simulation community. It briefly looks at some different kinds of context, and discussed the difficulty of talking about context, before looking at the “context heuristic” that seems to be used in human cognition. This allows for rich and fuzzy context recognition to be combined with crisp ‘foreground’ belief update and reasoning. Such a heuristic allows for causality to make sense, and limits the phenomena of causal spread—it is thus at the root of the modelling enterprise. This analysis is then applied to simulation modelling, considering the context of a simulation, and its ramifications, in particular, why generalisation is so hard.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrighetto G, Campennì M, Conte R, Cecconi F (2008) Conformity in multiple contexts: imitation vs norm recognition. In: World congress on social simulation 2008 (WCSS-08), George Mason University, Fairfax, USA
Barwise J, Perry J (1983) Situations and attitudes. MIT Press, Cambridge
Chattoe E (1998) Just how (un)realistic are evolutionary algorithms as representations of social processes? J Artif Soc Soc Simul 1(3):2. http://jasss.surrey.ac.uk/1/3/2.html
Coser LA (1977) The sociology of Max Weber. Vintage Books, New York
Deacon TW (1998) Symbolic species: the co-evolution of language and the brain. Norton, New York
Edmonds B (1999a) The pragmatic roots of context. In: CONTEXT’99, Trento, Italy, September 1999. Lecture notes in artificial intelligence, vol 1688, pp 119–132
Edmonds B (1999b) Capturing social embeddedness: a constructivist approach. Adapt Behav 7:323–348
Edmonds B (2002) Learning and exploiting context in agents. In: Proceedings of the 1st international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS), Bologna, Italy, July 2002. ACM, New York, pp 1231–1238
Edmonds B (2007) The practical modelling of context-dependent causal processes----a recasting of Robert Rosen’s thought. Chem Biodiv (special issue on Robert Rosen) 4(1):2386–2395
Edmonds B (2009) The nature of noise. In: Squazzoni F (ed) Epistemological aspects of computer simulation in the social sciences. Lecture notes in artificial intelligence, vol 5466, pp 169–182
Edmonds B (2010) Bootstrapping knowledge about social phenomena using simulation models. JASSS 13(1):8. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/13/1/8.html
Edmonds B (in press) Complexity and context-dependency. Found Sci
Edmonds B, Norling E (2007) Integrating learning and inference in multi-agent systems using cognitive context. In: Antunes L, Takadama K (eds) Multi-agent-based simulation. VII. Lecture notes in artificial intelligence, vol 4442, pp 142–155
Elliott CS, Hayward DM (1998) The expanding definition of framing and its particular impact on economic experimentation. J Socio-Econ 27(2):229–243
Entman RM (1993) Framing: towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. J Commun 43:51–58
Gärdenfors P (1997) The pragmatic role of modality in natural language. In: 20th Wittgenstein symposium, Kirchberg am Weshel, Lower Austria, Wittgenstein Society
Gigerenzer G (1996) Rationality: Why social context matters. In: Baltes PB, Staudinger U (eds) Interactive minds: life-span perspectives on the social foundation of cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Gilbert N (2006) When does social simulation need cognitive models? In: Sun R (ed) Cognition and multi-agent interaction: from cognitive modeling to social simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 428–432
Goffman E (1974) Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Greiner R, Darken C, Santoso NI (2001) Efficient reasoning. ACM Comput Surv 33(1):1–30
Hartmann S (2005) Models and stories in hadron physics. Preprint, http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/2433 (accessed 2010-10-13)
Hayes P (1995) Contexts in context. In: Context in knowledge representation and natural language, AAAI Fall Symposium, November 1997. MIT Press, Cambridge
Jolly A (2005) Social intelligence in primates and primatologists session. Invited talk AISB convention 2005 on social intelligence and interaction in animals, robots and agents, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, England, April 2005
Kaneko K (1990) Globally coupled chaos violates the law of large numbers but not the central-limit theorem. Phys Rev Lett 65:1391–1394
Kokinov B, Grinberg M (2001) Simulating context effects in problem solving with AMBR. In: Akman V, Bouquet P, Thomason R, Young RA (eds) Modelling and using context, vol 2116. Springer, Berlin, pp 221–234
Kuhn T (1966) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
McCarthy J, Hayes PJ (1969) Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. Mach Intel 4:463–502
McCarthy J (1971) Generality in artificial-intelligence—Turing award lecture. Commun ACM 30(12):1030–1035
McGilchrist I (2010) The master and his emissary: the divided brain and the making of the western world. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven
Nelson TE, Oxley ZM, Clawson RA (1997) Towards a psychological of framing effects. Polit Behav 19(3):221–246
Pearl J (2000) Causality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Polanyi M (1966) The tacit dimension. Doubleday
Schatz J, Craft S, Koby M, DeBaun MR (2004) Asymmetries in visual-spatial processing following childhood stroke. Neuropsychology 18:340–352
Schlosser A, Voss M, Brückner L (2005) On the simulation of global reputation systems. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 9(1):4. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/9/1/4.html
Shafir E, Simonson I, Tversky A (1993) Reason-based choice. Cognition 49(1–2):11–36
Schelling TC (1969) Models of segregation. Am Econ Rev 59(2):488–493
Schelling TC (1971) Dynamic models of segregation. J Math Sociol 1:143–186
Terán O (2004) Understanding MABS and social simulation: switching between languages in a hierarchy of levels. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 7(4):5. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/7/4/5.html
Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211(4481):453–458
Tykhonov D, Jonker C, Meijer S, Verwaart T (2008) Agent-based simulation of the trust and tracing game for supply chains and networks. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 11(3):1. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/11/3/1.html
Volberg G, Hubner R (2004) On the role of response conflicts and stimulus position for hemispheric differences in global/local processing: an ERP study. Neuropsychologia 42:1805–1813
Wheeler M, Clark A (1999) Genic representation: reconciling content and causal complexity. Br J Philos Sci 50(1):103–135
Zadrozny W (1997) A pragmatic approach to context. In: Context in knowledge representation and natural language, AAAI fall symposium, November 1997. MIT Press, Cambridge
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Edmonds, B. Context in social simulation: why it can’t be wished away. Comput Math Organ Theory 18, 5–21 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-011-9100-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-011-9100-z