Advertisement

Numerical investigation of the drag force for cross-sea bridge based on the two-way fluid-structure interaction

  • Shasha Deng
  • Huoming Shen
  • Lang Liu
  • Huaiping Tang
Article
  • 30 Downloads

Abstract

The substructure of cross-sea bridge has its unique structural form, the calculation of drag force is related to working, designing, constructing and maintaining of the bridge in the marine environment. So in order to guarantee the construction and use safely, accurate and convenient calculation method of drag force is necessary. The calculation method of drag force theory is studied in this paper, with using shear stress transport model to set up eddy viscosity model, which is adopted to establish the numerical water tank and analysis the whole process of eddy generation and shedding in the wake area. Considering the features of cross-sea bridge substructure, the effect of the flow velocity, the depth of water and the section form of pier on the drag force is researched. The difference between the superposition method and integral calculation method, which are used for calculating the drag force of group pile cap composite structure, is studied. The results show that the water flow velocity is square relation with the drag force, and the depth of water is linear relation with the drag force. The drag coefficient C D of round-ended pier is 1.35, which is between the values of circular pier and rectangular pier. Due to the shield and interference with each component, the drag force calculated by integral method is less than the other one, and the lift force can be considered in the integral method.

Keywords

Cross-sea bridge Drag force Morison equation SSTKW eddy viscosity model Two-way fluid-structure interaction Group pile cap 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the supports from the National Nature Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 51378437.

References

  1. 1.
    Storey, C., Delatte, N.: Lessons from the collapse of the Schoharie creek bridge. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Forensic Engineering, pp. 158–467 (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cao, M., Liu, Z., Meng, J.: Statistical analysis and reflections on bridge deficiencies and disasters in the United States. Highway. 7(7), 162–167 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    MacCamy, R., Fuchs, R.A.: Wave Forces on Piles: A Diffraction Theory. Beach Erosion Board Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC (1954)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Morison, J., Johnson, J., Schaaf, S.: The force exerted by surface waves on piles. J. Petrol. Technol. 2(05), 149–154 (1950)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sarpkaya, T.: Force on a circular cylinder in viscous oscillatory flow at low Keulegan-Carpenter numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 165, 61–71 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hrenya, C., Bolio, E., Chakrabarti, D., Sinclair, J.: Comparison of low Reynolds number k–ε turbulence models in predicting fully developed pipe flow. Chem. Eng. Sci. 50(12), 1923–1941 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    ANSYS C. Release 11.0. ANSYS CFX-Solver Theory Guide. ANSYS, Canonsburg (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shih, T.-H., Liou, W.W., Shabbir, A., Yang, Z., Zhu, J.: A new k-ϵ eddy viscosity model for high reynolds number turbulent flows. Comput. Fluids 24(3), 227–238 (1995)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ohmart, R.D., Gratz, R.: Drag coefficients from hurricane wave data. Civil Eng. Oceans IV 1, 260–272 (1979)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bishop, R., Hassan, A.: The lift and drag forces on a circular cylinder oscillating in a flowing fluid. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 277, 51–75 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu, S.-X., Li, Y.-C., Li, G.-W.: Wave current forces on the pile group of base foundation for the East Sea Bridge, China. J. Hydrodyn. B 19(6), 661–670 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yang, J., Lei, F., Li, K.: Analysis of vibration of underwater bridge pier structure. World Bridges 3, 43–45 (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang, S.-Q., Liang, B.-C.: Wave Mechanics for Ocean Engineering. Ocean University of China Publishing House, Qingdao (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Spalart, P.R., Allmaras, S.R.: A one equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. AIAA J. (1992).  https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1992-439 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gopalan, H., Heinz, S., Stöllinger, M.K.: A unified RANS–LES model: computational development, accuracy and cost. J. Comput. Phys. 249, 249–274 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Abe, K.-I.: An advanced switching parameter for a hybrid LES/RANS model considering the characteristics of near-wall turbulent length scales. Theoret. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 28(5), 499–519 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Breuer, M., Jaffrézic, B., Arora, K.: Hybrid LES–RANS technique based on a one-equation near-wall model. Theoret. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 22(3–4), 157–187 (2008)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Langhe, C.D., Merci, B., Dick, E.: Hybrid RANS/LES modelling with an approximate renormalization group. I: Model development. J. Turbul. 6, N13 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fadai-Ghotbi, A., Friess, C., Manceau, R., Borée, J.: A seamless hybrid RANS-LES model based on transport equations for the subgrid stresses and elliptic blending. Phys. Fluids 22(5), 055104 (2010)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fasel, H.F., Von Terzi, D.A., Sandberg, R.D.: A methodology for simulating compressible turbulent flows. J. Appl. Mech. 73(3), 405–412 (2006)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Girimaji, S.S., Srinivasan, R., Jeong, E. (eds.): PANS turbulence model for seamless transition between RANS and LES: fixed-point analysis and preliminary results. In: ASME/JSME 2003 4th Joint Fluids Summer Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hamba, F.: A hybrid RANS/LES simulation of turbulent channel flow. Theoret. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 16(5), 387–403 (2003)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Han, X., Krajnović, S.: An efficient very large eddy simulation model for simulation of turbulent flow. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 71(11), 1341–1360 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hedges, L., Travin, A., Spalart, P.: Detached-eddy simulations over a simplified landing gear. J. Fluids Eng. 124(2), 413–423 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Menter, F., Egorov, Y.: A scale-adaptive simulation model using two-equation models. AIAA paper, 2005-1095 (2005)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shur, M., Spalart, P., Strelets, M., Travin, A.: Detached-eddy simulation of an airfoil at high angle of attack. Eng. Turbul. Model. Exp. 4, 669–678 (1999)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tucker, P.G., Davidson, L.: Zonal k–l based large eddy simulations. Comput. Fluids 33(2), 267–287 (2004)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Davidson, L., Peng, S.-H.: Hybrid LES-RANS modelling: a one-equation SGS model combined with a k-ω model for predicting recirculating flows. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 43(9), 1003–1018 (2003)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Menter, F.R.: Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J. 32(8), 1598–1605 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sokolichin, A., Eigenberger, G.: Applicability of the standard k–ε turbulence model to the dynamic simulation of bubble columns: Part I. Detailed numerical simulations. Chem. Eng. Sci. 54(13), 2273–2284 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tiwari, A.K., Ghosh, P., Sarkar, J., Dahiya, H., Parekh, J.: Numerical investigation of heat transfer and fluid flow in plate heat exchanger using nanofluids. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 85, 93–103 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Marwaan, A.-K., Mossad, R.: Optimization of the heat exchanger in a flat plate indirect heating integrated collector storage solar water heating system. Renew. Energy 57, 413–421 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chen, B., Ho, K., Abakr, Y.A., Chan, A.: Fluid dynamics and heat transfer investigations of swirling decaying flow in an annular pipe Part 1: Review, problem description, verification and validation. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 97, 1029–1043 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Anderson, M. (ed.): Fluent CFD versus Sovran and Klomp diffuser data benchmark study. In: 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit (2008)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Allen, J.B., Riveros, G.: Hydrodynamic characterization of the Polyodon spathula Rostrum using CFD. J. Appl. Math. (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/346173 Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wang, Y.-H., Zou, Y.-S., Xu, L.-Q., Luo, Z.: Analysis of water flow pressure on bridge piers considering the impact effect. Math. Probl. Eng. 2015, 1–8 (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shasha Deng
    • 1
  • Huoming Shen
    • 1
  • Lang Liu
    • 2
  • Huaiping Tang
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mechanics and EngineeringSouthwest Jiaotong UniversityChengduPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Sichuan Provincial Transport DepartmentHighway Planning, Survey, Design and Research InstituteChengduChina

Personalised recommendations