Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic trust game model between venture capitalists and entrepreneurs based on reinforcement learning theory

  • Published:
Cluster Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been extensively demonstrated that the trust between venture capitalists and entrepreneurs plays an important role in improving the success rate of entrepreneurship. However, little research has been performed concerning the dynamic nature of the trust between venture capitalists and entrepreneurs. Therefore, we attempt to reveal the motivations and process of trust between VCs and entrepreneurs from the perspective of dynamics. First, the theoretical model of dynamic trust was proposed. Second, reinforcement learning was introduced to design the multi-stage game model of dynamic trust, and the algorithm was illustrated. Reinforcement learning theory can reveal the reasons for dynamic changes in trust from a psychological perspective. Finally, the action strategies of venture capitalists and entrepreneurs were simulated. We observe that the dynamic characteristics of trust between venture capitalists and entrepreneurs are determined by entrepreneurs’ efforts. Venture capitalists can prevent investment risks and maintain trust stability when fewer funds are invested in the early stage and when more funds are invested in the later stage. Since the dynamic process of trust is also the process of learning about the other, the dynamic process of trust is non-linear, and the relationship is adaptive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Timmons, J.A., Bygrave, W.D.: Venture capital’s role in financing innovation for economic growth. J. Bus. Ventur. 1, 161–176 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Starrglass, D.: Trust in transactional and relationship marketing: implications in a post-crsis world. Manag. Glob Transit. 9(2), 111–128 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Luhmann, N.: Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Probems and Alternatives in Making and Breaking Cooperative Relation, pp. 94–107. Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pavlou, P.A., Gefen, D.: Building effective online marketplace with institution-based trust. Inf. Syst. Res. 15(1), 37–59 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Song, J., Zahedi, F.: Trust in health infomediaries. Decis. Support Syst. 43, 390–407 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hagen, J.M., Choe, S.: Trust in Japanese interfirm relations: institutional sanctions matter. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23(3), 589–600 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kwon, S.W., Arenius, P.: Nations of entrepreneurs: a social capital perspective. J. Bus. Ventur. 25(3), 315–330 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Maxwell, A.L., Jeffrey, S.A., Lévesque, M.: Business angel early stage decision making. J. Bus. Ventur. 26(2), 212–225 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mayer, J.H., Davis, F.D.: Schoorman: an intergrive model of organizational trust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20(3), 709–734 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Poon, J.M.: Effects of benevolence, integrity, and ability on trust-in-supervisor. Empl. Relations 35(4), 396–407 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen, C., Ye, Y.: A case study of the asymmetry of trust among venture capitalists and entrepreneurs. Chin. Ind. Econ. 1, 147–157 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sorenson, O., StuarT, T.E.: Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. Am. J. Sociol. 106, 1546–1588 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Welter, F., Smallbone, D.: Exploring the role of trust in entrepreneurial activity. Entrepr. Theory Pract. 30(4), 465–475 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ye, Y., Jiang, Y.F.: A cross case study of the impact of trust on new ventures performance in venture capital institutions. Manag. World 10, 152–163 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gefen, E., Karahanna, D.W., Straub, D.: Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model. MIS Q. 27(1), 51–90 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gifford, S.: Limited attention and the role of the venture capitalist. J. Bus. Ventur. 12(6), 459–482 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bergemann, D., Hege, U.: Venture capital financing, moral hazard, and learning. J. Bank. Finance 22, 703–735 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wong, P.K., Ho, Y.P.: Characteristics and determinants of informal investment In Singapore. Venture Cap. 9(143), 43–70 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sudek, R.: Angel investment criteria. J. Small Bus. Strategy 17(2), 89–103 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rescorla, R.A., Wagner, A.R.: A theory of Pavolovian conditioning: variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement. Class. Cond. II 2, 64–99 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Watkin, C.J.: Q-learning. Mach. Learn. 8, 279–292 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schwartz, A.: A reinforcement learning method for maximizing undiscounted rewards. In: Proceedings software Tenth International Conference on Machine Learning (1993)

  23. Sutton, R.S., Barto, A.G.: Reinforcement learning: an introduction. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Wardle, M.C., Fitzgerald, D.A., Angstadt, M., et al.: The caudate signals bad reputation during trust decisions. PLoS ONE 8(6), e68884 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Singh, P., Norvig, D., Cohn, D.: Agents and reinforcement learning. Dr. Dobb’s J. Softw. Tools Prof. Program. 22(3), 3 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ptadepalli, P., Givan, R., Driessens, K.: Relational reinforcement learning: an overview. In: Proceedings of the 1CML Workshop on Relational Reinforcement Learning Barlff (2004)

  27. Klabunde, A.: How much should an investor trust the start-up entrepreneur? A network model. J. Econ. Interact Coord. 11, 293–312 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chang, L.J., Doll, B.B., van‘t Wout, M., et al.: Seeing is believing: trustworthinessas a dynamic belief. Cogn. Psychol. 61, 87–105 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chang, L.J., Yarkoni, T., Khaw, M.W., Sanfey, A.G.: Decoding the role of the insula in human cognition: functional parcellation and large-scale reverse inference. Cereb. Cortex 23(3), 739 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lewicki, R.J., Bunker, B.B.: Developing and Maintaining Trust in Working Relationships, Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kramer, R.M.: Trust and distrust in organizations: emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 50, 569–598 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Panteli, N., Sockalingam, S.: Trust and conflict within virtual inter-organizationalalliances: a framework for facilitating knowledge sharing. Decis. Support Syst. 39, 599–617 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Nielsen, B.B.: Multilevel issues in strategic alliance research. Emerging Percpectives. Researching Strategic Alliances: Emerging Issues, pp. 1–26 (2010)

  34. Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., McCabe, K.: Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games Econ. Behav. 10, 122–142 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ratnasingam, P.: Trust in inter-organizational exchanges: a case study in business to business electronic commerce. Decis. Support Syst. 39, 525–544 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Elitzur, R., Gavious, A.: A multi-period game theoretic model of venture capitalists and entrepreneurs. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 144, 440–453 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Sapienza, H.J., Gupta, A.K.: Impact of agency risks and task uncertainty on venture capitalist-CEO interaction. Acad. Manag. J. 37(6), 1618–1632 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li Haiyan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haiyan, L. Dynamic trust game model between venture capitalists and entrepreneurs based on reinforcement learning theory. Cluster Comput 22 (Suppl 3), 5893–5904 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-1666-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-1666-x

Keywords

Navigation