Advertisement

Cluster Computing

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 3015–3022 | Cite as

Image 1D OMP sparse decomposition with modified fruit-fly optimization algorithm

  • Ming Yang
  • Ning-bo Liu
  • Wei LiuEmail author
Article

Abstract

The Fruit-fly optimization algorithm (FOA) is good at parallel search ability in the evolution process, but it traps in local optimum sometimes. Simulated Annealing (SA) algorithm accepts the second-optimum solution with Mrtropolis criterion so as to jump out of the local optimum. So, combined the advantages of two algorithms, modified FOA (FOA-SA) algorithm is presented in this paper. In FOA-SA, the smell concentration function is improved as well, so as to get the whole searching directions for fruit-fly. At the same time, in order to solve the problem of the computational complexity in image 2D sparse decomposition, image 1D orthogonal matching pursuit (OMP) algorithm with FOA-SA algorithm is implemented. Experimental results show that the convergence of FOA-SA is better than that in FOA, and the speed of image 1D sparse algorithm is 2.41 times faster than 2D for the 512 \(\times \) 512 image under the same conditions.

Keywords

Orthogonal sparse decomposition (OMP) Fruit-fly optimization algorithm (FOA) Simulated annealing (SA) algorithm Global optimum Computational complexity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research work is supported by “Twelfth Five-year” Scientific Research Program (No. [2013] 325) of Jilin Province Education Department of China.

References

  1. 1.
    Averbuch, Amir Z., Zheludev, Valery A., Khazanovsky, Marie: Deconvolution by matching pursuit using spline wavelet packets dictionaries. Appl. Comput. Harmonic Anal. 31(1), 98–124 (2010)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Phillips, P.: Matching pursuit filter design. In: Proceedings of the 12th IAPR International Conference on Signal Processing, Jerusalem, Israel, 57–61 March 1994Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ouyang, Z., Li, Y.: Omp-based multi-band signal reconstruction for ecological sounds recognition. J. Electron. 31(1), 50–60 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guo, H.Y., Li, X.X., Zhou, L., Wu, Z.Y.: Single-channel speech separation using orthogonal matching pursuit. J. Softw. 9(11), 2974–2980 (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yin, Z.K., Xie, M., Wang, J.Y.: Image denoising base on its sparse decomposition. J. Univ. Electron. Sci. Technol. China 35(6), 876–878 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Czerepinski, P., Davies, C., Canagarajah, N., Bull, D.: Matching pursuits video coding: dictionaries and fast implementation. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. 10(7), 1103–1115 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhang, C.J., Liu, J., Liang, C., Xue, Z., Pang, J.B., Huang, Q.M.: Image classification by non-negative sparse coding, correlation constrained low-rank and sparse decomposition. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 123(6), 14–22 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yin, Z.K., Wang, J.Y., Pierre, V.: A fast algorithm for image reconstruction based on sparse decomposition. Front. Electr. Electron. Eng. China 2(4), 432–434 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yang, M., Chen, L.L.: OMP signal sparse decomposition with improved ACFOA. Comput. Eng. Appl. 51(20), 208–212 (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li, H.J., Yin, Z.K., Zhang, J.S., Wang, J.Y.: Image sparse decomposition based on particle swarm optimization with chaotic mutation. J. Southwest Jiaotong Univ. 43(4), 509–513 (2008)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li, X.Y., Yin, Z.K.: Image sparse decomposition algorithm based on MP and 1D FFT. Comput. Sci. 37(10), 246–250 (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Holland, J.H.: Building blocks, cohort genetic algorithms, and hyperplane-defined functions. Evol. Comput. 8(4), 373–391 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moghaddam, A., Behmanesh, J., Farsijani, A.: Parameters estimation for the new four-parameter nonlinear Muskingum model using the Particle Swarm Optimization. Water Resour. Manag. 30(7), 2143–2160 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shen, M.L., Li, L., Liu, D.: Research and application of function optimization based on Artificial Fish Swarm Algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer Engineering and Networks, Shanghai, China, 195–200 July 2014Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tang, Z., Lu, Z.D., Li, R.X.: A routing algorithm for risk-scanning agents using ant colony algorithm in P2P network. Wuhan Univ. J. Nat. Sci. 11(5), 1097–1103 (2006)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu, X., Chen, C., Zhao, Y.T., Wang, X.: Multi-wavelet decomposition and reconstruction based on matching pursuit algorithm fast optimized by particle swarm. J. Jilin Univ. 45(6), 1855–1861 (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liu, H., Wang, L.: On the application of MP sparse decomposition in image compression based on artificial fish swarm algorithm. J. Xi’an Univ. Arts Sci. 17(2), 74–77 (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liu, J.C., Guo, R., Qi, C.L.: Signal MP-based sparse decomposition with modified artificial bee colony algorithm. Techn. Autom. Appl. 35(5), 54–58 (2016)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pan, W.T.: A new fruit fly optimization algorithm: taking the financial distress model as an example. Knowl.-Based Syst. 26, 69–74 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ding, S.F., Zhang, X.K., Yu, J.Z.: Twin support vector machines based on fruit fly optimization algorithm. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern. 7(2), 193–203 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yang, Y., Xu, Z., Liu, L., Sun, G.: A security carving approach for AVI video based on frame size and index. Multimed. Tools Appl. 76(3), 3293–3312 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pan, Q.K., Sang, H.Y., Duan, J.H., Gao, L.: An improved fruit fly optimization algorithm for continuous function optimization problems. Knowl.-Based Syst. 62, 69–83 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jiang, M., Cheng, Y.: Simulated annealing artificial fish swarm algorithm. In: Proceedings of IEEE 8th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, Jinan, China, 1590–1593 July 2010Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Niknam, Taher, Amiri, Babak, Olamaei, Javad, Arefi, Ali: An efficient hybrid evolutionary optimization algorithm based on PSO and SA for clustering. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A 10(4), 512–519 (2009)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Li, C., Xu, S., Li, W., Hu, L.: A novel modified fly optimization algorithm for designing the self-tuning proportional integral derivative controller. J. Converg. Inf. Technol. 7(16), 69–77 (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Information and Control EngineeringJilin Institute of Chemical TechnologyJilinChina
  2. 2.Beijing Metstar Radar Co., LTD.BeijingChina

Personalised recommendations