Advertisement

Cluster Computing

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 2231–2252 | Cite as

PB-MII: replacing static RSUs with public buses-based mobile intermediary infrastructure in urban VANET-based clouds

  • Rasheed Hussain
  • Zeinab Rezaeifar
  • Junggab Son
  • Md Zakirul Alam Bhuiyan
  • Sangjin Kim
  • Heekuck OhEmail author
Article

Abstract

The success of vehicular ad hoc network (VANET) among vehicle consumers is subject to the quality of comfort and realism of safety promised by this technology. Recently VANET evolved to a rather more application and services-rich paradigm referred to as VANET-based clouds. However, the initial deployment stage of VANET and its successor VANET-based cloud is going to be a daunting challenge due to less market penetration rate of the technology-enabled vehicles, and the deployment and cost of road-side infrastructure. To fill the gaps, in this paper, after arguing on the predictability of spatiotemporal characteristics of the public transport buses in urban areas, we propose a mechanism where these buses are used as mobile gateways (MGs) among vehicles on the road, VANET authorities, and the cloud infrastructure. MGs work as functional entities of the mobile intermediary infrastructure (MII) in VANET-based clouds. Our proposed scheme can serve as a feasible, cost-effective, and pre-established MII for standalone VANET and VANET-based clouds. We furthermore, carry out feasibility analysis through a communication scheme in VANET-based clouds. More precisely we consider the traffic information aggregation and dissemination in VANET-based clouds. In order to argue on the feasibility of buses as MGs, we consider real-time road network dynamics in Seoul, South Korea where the public buses provide perfect connectivity to other vehicular nodes in the neighborhood. In VANET-based clouds application, vehicles share coarse-grained information with clouds through MGs and receive fine-grained traffic information from cloud infrastructure through MGs in real-time. Our simulation results show that MGs provide almost 100% coverage in average traffic scenarios and about 98% coverage in worst traffic scenarios. These MGs also provide the vehicles with about 84% traffic information in worst case and over 90% traffic information in average traffic scenarios. Our proposed infrastructure can be a strong rationale for the initial deployment of these technologies and can possibly be a reasonable partial or full replacement for static RSUs in the urban scenarios.

Keywords

VANET VANET-based clouds RSU deployment Mobile gateway Public buses Traffic view application 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was also supported in part by the NRF (National Research Foundation of Korea) grant funded by the Korea government MEST (Ministry of Education, Science and Technology) (No. NRF-2015R1D1A1A09058200).

References

  1. 1.
    Whaiduzzaman, M., et al.: A survey on vehicular cloud computing. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 40, 325–344 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.jnca.2013.08.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eltoweissy, M., et al.: Towards autonomous vehicular clouds. In: Zheng, J., et al. (eds.) Ad Hoc Networks. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol. 49, pp. 1–16. Springer, Berlin (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Abuelela, S. Olariu: Taking VANET to the clouds. In: Editor (ed.) Book Taking VANET to the Clouds, Series Taking VANET to the Clouds, ACM, pp. 6–13 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Q. Xu, et al.: Vehicle-to-vehicle safety messaging in DSRC. In: Editor (ed.) Book Vehicle-to-vehicle safety messaging in DSRC, Series Vehicle-to-vehicle safety messaging in DSRC, ACM, pp. 19–28 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hussain, R., et al.: Rethinking vehicular communications: merging VANET with cloud computing. In: 2012 IEEE 4th International Conference on Proceedings of the Cloud Computing Technology and Science (CloudCom), pp. 606–609 (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mao, Y., et al.: A game-based incentive model for service cooperation in VANETs. Concurr. Comput. 28(3), 674–687 (2016). doi: 10.1002/cpe.3340 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Malandrino, F., et al.: Verification and inference of positions in vehicular networks through anonymous beaconing. In: IEEE transactions on mobile computing, vol. 13, pp. 2415–2418 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Meireles, R., et al.: Experimental study on the impact of vehicular obstructions in VANETs. In: Proceedings of the Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC), 2010 IEEE, pp. 338–345Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boban, M., et al.: TVR—tall vehicle relaying in vehicular networks. In: IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 99 (2013). doi: 10.1109/tmc.2013.70
  10. 10.
    Boban, M., et al.: Exploiting the height of vehicles in vehicular communication. In: 2011 IEEE Proceedings of the Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC), pp. 163–170 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cavalcante, E.S., et al.: Roadside unit deployment for information dissemination in a VANET: an evolutionary approach. In: Book Roadside unit deployment for information dissemination in a VANET: an evolutionary approach. Series Roadside unit deployment for information dissemination in a VANET: an evolutionary approach, pp. 27–34. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu, X., et al.: SEMD: Secure and efficient message dissemination with policy enforcement in VANET. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 82(8), 1316–1328 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tabassum, M., et al.: Interference-aware high-throughput channel allocation mechanism for CR-VANETs. EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw. 2016(1), 2 (2016). doi: 10.1186/s13638-015-0494-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Barrachina, J., et al.: Road side unit deployment: a density-based approach. Intell. Transp. Syst. Mag. IEEE 5(3), 30–39 (2013). doi: 10.1109/MITS.2013.2253159 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aslam, B., et al.: Optimal roadside units placement in urban areas for vehicular networks. In: 2012 IEEE Symposium on Proceedings of the Computers and Communications (ISCC), pp. 000423–000429 (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yingsi, L., et al.: Optimal placement and configuration of roadside units in vehicular networks. In: 2012 IEEE 75th Proceedings of the Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring), pp. 1–6 (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wu, T.-J., et al.: A cost-effective strategy for road-side unit placement in vehicular networks. IEEE Trans. Commun. 60(8), 2295–2303 (2012). doi: 10.1109/TCOMM.2012.062512.100550 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Xiong, Y., et al.: RoadGate: mobility-centric roadside units deployment for vehicular networks. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 2013, 10 (2013). doi: 10.1155/2013/690974 Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hussain, R., et al.: Using public buses as mobile gateways in vehicular clouds. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Proceedings of the Consumer Electronics (ICCE), pp. 175–176 (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mershad, K., et al.: ROAMER: roadside units as message routers in VANETs. Ad Hoc Netw. 10(3), 479–496 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Filippini, I., et al.: Non-cooperative RSU deployment in vehicular networks. In: 2012 9th Annual Conference on Proceedings of the Wireless On-Demand Network Systems and Services (WONS), pp. 79–82 (2012)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu, Y., et al.: Roadside units deployment for content downloading in vehicular networks. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. (ICC) 2013, 6365–6370 (2013)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mehar, S., et al.: An Optimized Roadside Units (RSU) placement for delay-sensitive applications in vehicular networks. In: Proceedings of the 2015 12th Annual IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Silva, C.M., et al.: Non-intrusive planning the roadside infrastructure for vehicular networks. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transp. Syst. 17(4), 938–947 (2016). doi: 10.1109/TITS.2015.2490143
  25. 25.
    Wang, Y., et al.: Delivery delay analysis for roadside unit deployment in vehicular ad hoc networks with intermittent connectivity. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. (2015). doi: 10.1109/TVT.2015.2506599
  26. 26.
    Kitani, T.: Efficient VANET-based traffic information sharing using buses on regular routes. In: Proceedings of the Vehicular Technology Conference, et al.: VTC Spring 2008, pp. 3031–3036 . IEEE (2008)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jie, L., et al.: MI-VANET: a new mobile infrastructure based VANET architecture for urban environment. In: 2010 IEEE 72nd Proceedings of the Vehicular Technology Conference Fall (VTC 2010-Fall), pp. 1–5 (2010)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wei Kuang, L., et al.: Bus assisted connectionless routing protocol for metropolitan VANET. In: 2011 Fifth International Conference on Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computing (ICGEC), pp. 57–60 (2011)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chyi-Ren, D., et al.: An efficient data circulation and discovery scheme in VANETs using public transportation systems. In: International Conference on Proceedings of the Network and Service Management (CNSM) (2010)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Holzer, A., et al.: BROADTRIP: Broadcast for transit in platoons. In: 2011 IEEE 7th International Conference on Proceedings of the Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob), pp. 301–306 (2011)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lei, Z., et al.: Multi-modal message dissemination in vehicular ad-hoc networks. In: 2012 1st IEEE International Conference on Proceedings of the Communications in China (ICCC), pp. 670–675 (2012)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yuwei, X. et al.: Efficient detection scheme for urban traffic congestion using buses. In: 2012 26th International Conference on Proceedings of the Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (WAINA), pp. 287–293 (2012)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kun-chan, L., Ze Ming, W.: On the feasibility of using public transport as data mules for traffic monitoring. In: 2008 IEEE Proceedings of the Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, pp. 979–984 (2008)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Xiaoxiao, J., Du, D.H.C.: A BUS vehicular network integrated with traffic infrastructure. In: 2013 International Conference on Proceedings of the Connected Vehicles and Expo (ICCVE), pp. 562–567 (2013)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yan, H., et al.: Multicast capacity analysis for social-proximity urban bus-assisted VANETs. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Proceedings of the Communications (ICC), pp. 6138–6142Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tonguz, O.K., Viriyasitavat, W.: Cars as roadside units: a self-organizing network solution. IEEE Commun. Mag. 51(12), 112–120 (2013). doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2013.6685766 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    U.S.D.o.T. (DoT): Research and Innovative Technology Administration. http://www.itscosts.its.dot.gov/
  38. 38.
    Hussain, R., et al.: A paradigm shift from vehicular ad hoc networks to vanet-based clouds. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 83(2), 1131–1158 (2015). doi: 10.1007/s11277-015-2442-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ibrahim, K., Weigle, M.C.: CASCADE: cluster-based accurate syntactic compression of aggregated data in VANETs. In: 2008 IEEE Proceedings of the GLOBECOM Workshops, pp. 1–10 (2008)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Alsubaihi, B., Boukerche, A.: Semantic and self-decision geocast protocol for data dissemination over VANET (SAS-GP). In: Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), pp. 1948–1953 (2015)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ucar, S., et al.: VeSCA: Vehicular stable cluster-based data aggregation. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Connected Vehicles and Expo (ICCVE), pp. 1080–1085 (2014)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Harri, J., et al.: Rethinking the overhead of geo-localization information for vehicular communications. In: 2007 IEEE 66th Proceedings of the Vehicular Technology Conference, 2007. VTC-2007 Fall. pp. 2111–2115 (2007)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sommer, C., et al.: Traffic information systems: efficient message dissemination via adaptive beaconing. IEEE Commun. Mag. 49(5), 173–179 (2011). doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2011.5762815 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rasheed Hussain
    • 1
  • Zeinab Rezaeifar
    • 2
  • Junggab Son
    • 4
  • Md Zakirul Alam Bhuiyan
    • 5
  • Sangjin Kim
    • 3
  • Heekuck Oh
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Institute of Information SystemsInnopolis UniversityInnopolisRussia
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringHanyang UniversityAnsanSouth Korea
  3. 3.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringKorea University of Technology and EducationCheonanSouth Korea
  4. 4.Department of Computer Science, College of Computing and Software EngineeringKennesaw State UniversityMariettaUSA
  5. 5.Department of Computer and Information SciencesFordham UniversityBronxUSA

Personalised recommendations