Cluster Computing

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 61–78

Nephele streaming: stream processing under QoS constraints at scale

Article

DOI: 10.1007/s10586-013-0281-8

Cite this article as:
Lohrmann, B., Warneke, D. & Kao, O. Cluster Comput (2014) 17: 61. doi:10.1007/s10586-013-0281-8

Abstract

The ability to process large numbers of continuous data streams in a near-real-time fashion has become a crucial prerequisite for many scientific and industrial use cases in recent years. While the individual data streams are usually trivial to process, their aggregated data volumes easily exceed the scalability of traditional stream processing systems.

At the same time, massively-parallel data processing systems like MapReduce or Dryad currently enjoy a tremendous popularity for data-intensive applications and have proven to scale to large numbers of nodes. Many of these systems also provide streaming capabilities. However, unlike traditional stream processors, these systems have disregarded QoS requirements of prospective stream processing applications so far.

In this paper we address this gap. First, we analyze common design principles of today’s parallel data processing frameworks and identify those principles that provide degrees of freedom in trading off the QoS goals latency and throughput. Second, we propose a highly distributed scheme which allows these frameworks to detect violations of user-defined QoS constraints and optimize the job execution without manual interaction. As a proof of concept, we implemented our approach for our massively-parallel data processing framework Nephele and evaluated its effectiveness through a comparison with Hadoop Online.

For an example streaming application from the multimedia domain running on a cluster of 200 nodes, our approach improves the processing latency by a factor of at least 13 while preserving high data throughput when needed.

Keywords

Massively-parallel Stream processing Distributed systems Latency QoS 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Technische Universität BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.International Computer Science Institute (ICSI)BerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations