Skip to main content

Severe peritoneal sclerosis after repeated pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with oxaliplatin (PIPAC OX): report of two cases and literature survey

Abstract

Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a new laparoscopic administration of chemotherapy for peritoneal metastasis (PM). PIPAC is repeated every 5th week, and seems to stabilize or improve quality of life, and might improve survival. So far, PIPAC has been well tolerated. With this paper, we aim to highlight a potential severe adverse reaction, as we describe the first cases of severe peritoneal sclerosis (SPS) caused by PIPAC. Patients with isolated PM were included in a prospective PIPAC protocol. Following insufflation of normothermic CO2, laparoscopy was performed at an intraabdominal pressure of 12 mmHg. After peritoneal lavage and quadrant biopsies of the PM, the patients were treated with oxaliplatin 92 mg/m2 (flowrate 0.5 ml/s, maximum pressure of 200 per square inch). Treatment related toxicity was evaluated after 2 weeks. Response was evaluated histologically by the Peritoneal Regression Grading Score (PRGS) and cytologically by analysis of the lavage fluid. In a series of 24 PIPAC patients treated with oxaliplatin, two patients developed SPS. Patient one had a mucinous adenocarcinoma of the appendix with PM, the mean PRGS was reduced from 2.75 to 1.75 during the course of therapy. Patient two had an appendiceal goblet cell carcinoid with a dominating mucinous adenocarcinoma component with PM, the mean PRGS was reduced from 2.00 to 1.67. Repeated applications of PIPAC with oxaliplatin can lead to SPS.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Abbreviations

EPS:

Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis

IPC:

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy

PIPAC:

Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy

PM:

Peritoneal metastasis

SPS:

Severe peritoneal sclerosis

References

  1. Jayne DG, Fook S, Loi C, Seow-Choen F (2002) Peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 89:1545–1550

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sadeghi B, Arvieux C, Glehen O et al (2000) Peritoneal carcinomatosis from non-gynecologic malignancies: results of the EVOCAPE 1 multicentric prospective study. Cancer 88:358–363

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Glehen O, Gilly FN, Boutitie F et al (2010) Toward curative treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from nonovarian origin by cytoreductive surgery combined with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a multi-institutional study of 1,290 patients. Cancer 116:5608–5618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Glockzin G, Schlitt HJ, Piso P (2016) Therapeutic options for peritoneal metastasis arising from colorectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 7:343–352

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Lambert LA (2015) Looking up: Recent advances in understanding and treating peritoneal carcinomatosis. CA Cancer J Clin 65:284–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Solass W, Kerb R, Murdter T et al (2014) Intraperitoneal chemotherapy of peritoneal carcinomatosis using pressurized aerosol as an alternative to liquid solution: first evidence for efficacy. Ann Surg Oncol 21:553–559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Solass W, Hetzel A, Nadiradze G et al (2012) Description of a novel approach for intraperitoneal drug delivery and the related device. Surg Endosc 26:1849–1855

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Grass F, Vuagniaux A, Teixeira-Farinha H et al (2017) Systematic review of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced peritoneal carcinomatosis. Br J Surg 104:669–678

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Odendahl K, Solass W, Demtroder C et al (2015) Quality of life of patients with end-stage peritoneal metastasis treated with pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). Eur J Surg Oncol 41:1379–1385

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Takebayashi K, Sonoda H, Shimizu T et al (2014) Successful surgical approach for a patient with encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis after hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a case report and literature review. BMC Surg 14:57

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Aihara H, Maruoka H, Kiyozaki H, Konishi F (2003) Sclerosing encapsulating peritonitis (SEP) as a delayed complication of continuous hyperthermic peritoneal perfusion (CHPP): report of a case. Surg Today 33:232–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Korte MR, Sampimon DE, Betjes MG, Krediet RT (2011) Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis: the state of affairs. Nat Rev Nephrol 7:528–538

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Alatab S, Najafi I, Pourmand G et al (2017) Risk factors of severe peritoneal sclerosis in chronic peritoneal dialysis patients. Ren Fail 39:32–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mehta SS, Gelli M, Agarwal D, Goere D (2016) Complications of cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC in the treatment of peritoneal metastases. Indian J Surg Oncol 7:225–229

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Solass W, Sempoux C, Detlefsen S, Carr NJ, Bibeau F (2016) Peritoneal sampling and histological assessment of therapeutic response in peritoneal metastasis: proposal of the Peritoneal Regression Grading Score (PRGS). Pleura Peritoneum 1:99–107

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tempfer CB (2015) Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy as an innovative approach to treat peritoneal carcinomatosis. Med Hypotheses 85:480–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dean E, Khoja L, Clamp A et al (2017) Malignant bowel obstruction in advanced ovarian cancer. Future Oncol 13:513–521

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. van Baal JO, Van de Vijver KK, Nieuwland R et al (2017) The histophysiology and pathophysiology of the peritoneum. Tissue Cell 49:95–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stommel MW, Strik C, van Goor H (2014) Response to pathological processes in the peritoneal cavity—sepsis, tumours, adhesions, and ascites. Semin Pediatr Surg 23:331–335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Garosi G (2009) Different aspects of peritoneal damage: fibrosis and sclerosis. Contrib Nephrol 163:45–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Reymond MA (2014) PIPAC pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy—cancer under pressure. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jacquet P, Stuart OA, Chang D, Sugarbaker PH (1996) Effects of intra-abdominal pressure on pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of doxorubicin after intraperitoneal administration. Anticancer Drugs 7:596–603

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Esquis P, Consolo D, Magnin G et al (2006) High intra-abdominal pressure enhances the penetration and antitumor effect of intraperitoneal cisplatin on experimental peritoneal carcinomatosis. Ann Surg 244:106–112

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Facy O, Al Samman S, Magnin G et al (2012) High pressure enhances the effect of hyperthermia in intraperitoneal chemotherapy with oxaliplatin: an experimental study. Ann Surg 256:1084–1088

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Khosrawipour V, Giger-Pabst U, Khosrawipour T et al (2016) Effect of irradiation on tissue penetration depth of doxorubicin after pressurized intra-peritoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in a novel ex-vivo model. J Cancer 7:910–914

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Khosrawipour V, Khosrawipour T, Kern AJ et al (2016) Distribution pattern and penetration depth of doxorubicin after pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in a postmortem swine model. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 142:2275–2280

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tempfer CB, Rezniczek GA, Ende P et al (2015) Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with cisplatin and doxorubicin in women with peritoneal carcinomatosis: a cohort study. Anticancer Res 35:6723–6729

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Graversen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study complies with the Helsinki Declaration and was approved by The Regional Committees on Health Research Ethics for Southern Denmark (Project-ID: S-20140211, http://www.clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT02320448), and all participants gave oral and written informed consent.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Graversen, M., Detlefsen, S., Pfeiffer, P. et al. Severe peritoneal sclerosis after repeated pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with oxaliplatin (PIPAC OX): report of two cases and literature survey. Clin Exp Metastasis 35, 103–108 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-018-9895-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-018-9895-9

Keywords

  • PIPAC
  • Peritoneal metastasis
  • Complications
  • Peritoneal sclerosis
  • Encapsulated peritoneal sclerosis
  • Intraperitoneal chemotherapy