Abstract
The protection and sustainable use of environmental resources is one of the most salient tasks in Arctic regional governance, given that the region is a particularly fragile zone threatened by global warming and polar pollution. In recent years, as the People’s Republic of China has significantly increased its economic presence in the High North, whether and how Beijing’s Arctic engagement has influenced its efforts to prevent further climatic change associated with global warming and the accumulation of toxic substances are particularly important questions in the study of Arctic politics and global environmental governance. Borrowing insights from the costly signaling literature, this article presents an investigation of these questions. Contrary to the popular “Western-based” perspective that Beijing’s Arctic involvement will inevitably exaggerate human-induced environmental hazards, I argue that China’s pursuit to integrate itself into Arctic affairs and foster a responsible great power image incentivizes it to pledge more ambitious environmental policies as a costly signal to demonstrate that the rising power is willing to adhere to the Arctic’s existing norms and rules instead of challenging the status quo. Thus, China’s engagement can contribute to environmental governance and sustainable development in the Arctic region. Relying on a set of time-series error correction models and ordinary least-square regression models, the analysis shows that China’s Arctic engagement is positively correlated with its environmental policy stringency. This research advances the understanding of the implications of under-studied state actors for Arctic sustainable development and environmental governance, suggesting that the international community can benefit from accepting China into the Arctic instead of pushing it away from the circle.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The dataset used in this research is available from the author on request.
References
Achen C, Snidal D (1989) Rational deterrence theory and comparative case studies. World Polit 41(2):143–169
Ambrose J (2020) China’s carbon pledge will require complete inversion of existing system. In: The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/sep/27/china-carbon-pledge-put-energy-system-reverse-wind-solar. Accessed 19 June 2023
Ambrosio T, Hall SG, Obydenkova A (2022) Sustainable development agendas of regional international organizations: the European Bank of Reconstruction and Development and the Eurasian Development Bank. Probl Post-Communism 69(4-5):304–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2021.1979412
Bottomley C, Ooko M, Gasparrini A, Keogh R (2023) In praise of Prais-Winsten: an evaluation of methods used to account for autocorrelation in interrupted time series. Stat Med 42(8):1277–1288
Byers M, Covey N (2019) Arctic SAR and the “security dilemma”. Int J 74(4):499–517
Canosa I, Ford J, McDowell G, Jones J, Pearce T (2020) Progress in climate change adaptation in the Arctic. Environ Res Lett 15(9):093009
Chater A (2016) Explaining non-Arctic states in the Arctic Council. Strat Anal 40(3):173–184
Chen X (2017) China’s energy security and Sino-Russia energy cooperation. Northeast Asia Forum 26(3):59–71. https://doi.org/10.13654/j.cnki.naf.2017.03.006
China (1999) China’s first Arctic expedition. http://www.china.org.cn/english/features/40958.htm. Accessed 19 June 2023
Christakis N, Fowler J (2013) Social contagion theory: examining dynamic social networks and human behavior. Stat Med 32(4):556–577
Daniels T (2022) How can the USA and China cooperate and learn from each other to reduce greenhouse gas emissions? Socio-Ecol Pract Res 4(2):103–115
Danilov P (2021) US, China and Russia plan joint research in order to regulate Arctic fishing. In: High North News. https://www.highnorthnews.com/en/us-china-and-russia-plan-joint-research-order-regulate-arctic-fishing. Accessed 19 June 2023
De Boef S, Keele L (2008) Taking time seriously. Am J Pol Sci 52(1):184–200
Demchuk AL, Mišić M, Obydenkova A, Tosun J (2022) Environmental conflict management: a comparative cross-cultural perspective of China and Russia. Post-Commun Econ 34(7):871–893. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2021.1943915
Dong L (2017) The construction of. China’s identity of “Arctic stakeholder” Pacific Journal 25(6):65–77. https://doi.org/10.14015/j.cnki.1004-8049.2017.6.006
Doshi R, Huang A, Zhang G (2021) Northern expedition: China’s Arctic activities and ambitions. In: Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/research/northern-expedition-chinas-arctic-activities-and-ambitions/. Accessed 19 June 2023
Eva Dou (2018) A new Cold War? China declares itself a ‘near-Arctic state’ The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/a-new-cold-war-china-declares-itself-a-near-arctic-state-1516965315. Accessed 19 June 2023
Filimonova N, Obydenkova A, Rodrigues Vieira VG (2023) Geopolitical and economic interests in environmental governance: explaining observer state status in the Arctic Council. Clim Change 176(50). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-023-03490-8
Ford J, Pearce T, Canosa I, Harper S (2021) The rapidly changing Arctic and its societal implications. Wiley Interdiscip Rev: Clim Change 12(6):e735
Garbis Z, McCarthy E, Orttung R, Poelzer G, Shaiman M, Tafrate J (2023) Governing the green economy in the Arctic. Clim Change 176(33)
Haber S, Menaldo V (2011) Do natural resources fuel authoritarianism? A reappraisal of the resource curse. Am Pol Sci Rev 105(1):1–26
Hall S, Lenz T, Obydenkova A (2022) Environmental commitments and rhetoric over the pandemic crisis: social media and legitimation of the AIIB, the EAEU, and the EU. Post-Commun Econ 34(5):577–602
Hall T, Yarhi-Milo K (2012) The personal touch: leaders’ impressions, costly signaling, and assessments of sincerity in international affairs. Int Stud Quart 56(3):560–573
Hartwell C (2023) In our (frozen) backyard: the Eurasian Union and regional environmental governance in the Arctic. Clim Change 176(4):1–22
House Foreign Affairs Committee (2022) China regional snapshot: Arctic. https://foreignaffairs.house.gov/china-regional-snapshot-arctic/. Accessed 19 June 2023
Izotov VS, Obydenkova A (2021) Geopolitical games in Eurasian regionalism: ideational interactions and regional international organisations. Post-Commun Econ 33(2-3):150–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2020.1793584
Jakobson L (2010) China prepares for an Ice-free Arctic. In: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. https://www.sipri.org/publications/2010/sipri-insights-peace-and-security/china-prepares-ice-free-arctic. Accessed 19 June 2023
Jervis R (1989) The logic of images in international relations. Columbia University Press, New York City
Johnson J (1993) Is talk really cheap? Prompting conversation between critical theory and rational choice. Am Polit Sci Rev 87(1):74–86
Keele L, Linn S, Webb C (2016) Treating time with all due seriousness. Polit Anal 24(1):31–41
Kertzer J, Rathbun B, Rathbun N (2020) The price of peace: motivated reasoning and costly signaling in international relations. Int Organ 74(1):95–118
Kim S (2022) Quick on the draw: American negativity bias and costly signals in international relations. J Confl Resolut 66(2):246–271
Kydd A (2003) Which side are you on? Bias, credibility, and mediation. Am J Polit Sci 47(4):597–611
Lanteigne M (2017) ‘Have you entered the storehouses of the snow?’China as a norm entrepreneur in the Arctic. Polar Rec 53(2):117–130
Lanteigne M, Ping S (2015) China’s developing Arctic policies: myths and misconceptions. J China Int Relat 3(1):1–25. https://doi.org/10.5278/ojs.jcir.v3i1.1144
Larson D (2000) Anatomy of mistrust: US-Soviet relations during the Cold War. Cornell University Press, New York
Lavelle K (2022) Regime, climate, and region in transition: Russian participation in the Arctic Council. Probl Post-Commun 69(4-5):345–357
Libman A, Obydenkova A (2013) Informal governance and participation in non-democratic international organizations. Rev Int Organ 8(2):221–245
Libman A, Obydenkova A (2014) Governance of commons in a large nondemocratic country: the case of forestry in the Russian Federation. Publius: J Federalism 44(2):298–323. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjt065
Libman A, Obydenkova A (2018) Regional international organizations as a strategy of autocracy: the Eurasian Economic Union and Russian foreign policy. Int Aff 94(5):1037–1058
Liu N (2020) Why China needs an Arctic Policy 2.0. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2020/10/why-china-needs-an-arctic-policy-2-0/. Accessed 19 June 2023
Liu Q, Shumway C (2006) Geographic aggregation and induced innovation in American agriculture. Appl Econ 38(6):671–682
Marinelli M (2018) How to build a “beautiful China” in the Anthropocene. The political discourse and the intellectual debate on ecological civilization. J Chinese Polit Sci 23(3):365–386
Mavisakalyan A, Otrachshenko V, Popova O (2023) Does democracy protect the environment? The role of the Arctic Council. Clim Change 176(49). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-023-03511-6
Leila Mead (2022) A warming Arctic is a warning for the world.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China (2017) Joint declaration between the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of Finland on establishing and promoting the future-oriented new-type cooperative partnership. https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/wjdt_665385/2649_665393/201704/t20170406_679492.html. Accessed 19 June 2023. Accessed 19 June 2023
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China (2018) China’s Arctic Policy. https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/wjdt_665385/wjzcs/201801/t20180126_679659.html. Accessed 19 June 2023
Mišić M, Obydenkova A (2022) Environmental conflict, renewable energy, or both? Public opinion on small hydropower plants in Serbia. Post-Commun Econ 34(5):684–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2021.1943928
Morello C (2019b) Pompeo warns of the dangers of Russian and Chinese activities in the Arctic. In: The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/pompeo-warns-of-dangers-of-russian-and-chinese-activities-in-the-arctic/2019/05/06/e2e99690-7001-11e9-9eb4-0828f5389013_story.html. Accessed 19 June 2023
Morello C (2019a) Pompeo warns of the dangers of Russian and Chinese activities in the Arctic. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/pompeo-warns-of-dangers-of-russian-and-chinese-activities-in-the-arctic/2019/05/06/e2e99690-7001-11e9-9eb4-0828f5389013_story.html. Accessed 19 June 2023
National Development and Reform Commission (2017) Vision for Maritime Cooperation under the Belt and Road Initiative. http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2017-06/20/c_136380414.htm. Accessed 19 June 2023
Nazarov Z, Obydenkova A (2022) Environmental challenges and political regime transition: the role of historical legacies and the European Union in Eurasia. Probl Post-Commun 69(4-5):396–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2021.1995437
Obydenkova A (2022a) Environmental regionalism and international organizations: implications for post-communism. Probl Post-Commun 69(4–5):293–303
Obydenkova A (2022b) Sustainable development and actors of regional environmental governance: Eurasia at the crossroads. Probl Post-Commun 69(4-5):436–443
Obydenkova A (2022c) Global environmental politics and international organizations: the Eurasian and European experience. Post-Commun Econ 34(5):565–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2022.2028477
Obydenkova A (2022d) Strategies and challenges of sustainable development in Eurasia. Post-Commun Econ 34(7):835–846. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2022.2028478
Pedersen R, Reykers Y (2023) Invitation games and the politics of joining US-led coalition warfare: a small state perspective. Int Relat:00471178231166562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117823116656
Pietikäinen S (2018) Fragile Arctic must be protected. In: The Parliament https://www.theparliamentmagazine.eu/news/article/fragile-arctic-must-be-protected. Accessed 19 June 2023
Pincus R (2020) Three-way power dynamics in the Arctic. Strat Stud Quart 14(1):40–63
Quek K (2021) Four costly signaling mechanisms. Am Polit Sci Rev 115(2):537–549
Ramsay K (2011) Cheap talk diplomacy, voluntary negotiations, and variable bargaining power. Int Stud Quart 55(4):1003–1023
Rantanen M, Karpechko AY, Lipponen A, Nordling K, Hyvärinen O, Ruosteenoja K et al (2022) The Arctic has warmed nearly four times faster than the globe since 1979. Commun Earth Environ 3(1):1–10
Raymond L (2004) Economic growth as environmental policy? Reconsidering the environmental Kuznets curve. J Public Policy 24(3):327–348
Rand Review (2022) What does China’s Arctic presence mean to the United States?. https://www.rand.org/blog/rand-review/2022/12/what-does-chinas-arctic-presence-mean-to-the-us.html. Accessed 19 June 2023
Euan Rocha (2013) CNOOC closes $15.1 billion acquisition of Canada’s Nexen Reuters: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-nexen-cnooc-idUSBRE91O1A420130225. Accessed 19 June 2023
Sartori A (2002) The might of the pen: a reputational theory of communication in international disputes. Int Organ 56(1):121–149
Schelling T (1966) Arms and influence. Yale University Press, New Haven
Sengupta S, Myers S (2019) Latest Arena for China’s growing global ambitions: the Arctic. In: The New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/24/climate/china-arctic.html. Accessed 19 June 2023
Shahbaz M, Leità N (2013) Portuguese carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: a time series analysis. Bull Energy Econ (BEE) 1(1):1–7
Shrestha N (2020) Detecting multicollinearity in regression analysis. Am J Appl Math Stat 8(2):39–42
Slinker B, Glantz S (1985) Multiple regression for physiological data analysis: the problem of multicollinearity. Am J Physiol-Regul Integr Comp Physiol 249(1):R1–R12
Stepanov I, Makarov I, Makarova E, Smolovik E (2023) Climate change and challenges to sustainable development in the Russian Arctic. Clim Change 176(39)
Stephen K (2019) New report: China is in the Arctic to stay. In: High North News. https://www.highnorthnews.com/en/new-report-china-arctic-stay. Accessed 19 June 2023
Tillman H, Yang J, Nielsson E (2018) The polar silk road: China’s new frontier of international cooperation. China Quart Int Strat Stud 4(3):345–362
Tosun J, Shyrokykh K (2022) Leadership in high-level forums on energy governance: China and Russia compared. Post-Commun Econ 34(7):847–870. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2021.1964742
U.S. Geological Survey (2008) Circum-Arctic resource appraisal: estimates of undiscovered oil and gas north of the Arctic Circle. https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2008/3049/fs2008-3049.pdf. Accessed 19 June 2023
Uddin J (2009) Time series behavior of imports and exports of Bangladesh: evidence from cointegration analysis and error correction model. Int J Econ Finance 1(2):156–162
United Nations (2022) If you’re not thinking about the climate impacts of thawing permafrost, (here’s why) you should be. https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/01/1110722. Accessed 19 June 2023
Versen J, Mnatsakanyan Z, Urpelainen J (2022) Concerns of climate intervention: understanding geoengineering security concerns in the Arctic and beyond. Clim Change 171(27). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-022-03345-8
Vladimirova V (2023) Regional environmental governance of protected natural territories in the European North: Russia, Finland, and Norway, and the case of Pasvik-Inari Trilateral Park. Clim Change 176(85). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-023-03559-4
Volscho T, Kelly N (2012) The rise of the super-rich: power resources, taxes, financial markets, and the dynamics of the top 1 percent, 1949 to 2008. Am Sociol Rev 77(5):679–699
Wang C, Wang F (2017) China can lead on climate change. Science 357(6353):764–764
Welch C (2019) Arctic permafrost is thawing fast. In: That affects us all. National Geography https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/article/arctic-permafrost-is-thawing-it-could-speed-up-climate-change-feature. Accessed 19 June 2023
World Bank Group (2022) Country climate and development report. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/35ea9337-dfcf-5d60-9806-65913459d928/content. Accessed 19 June 2023
Wu F (2022) Shaping China’s engagement with the Arctic: nationalist narratives and geopolitical reality. J Contemp China:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2022.2124353
Xie C (2022) Guest post: is China living up to its pledges on climate change and energy transition? Carbonbrief. https://www.carbonbrief.org/guest-post-is-china-living-up-to-its-pledges-on-climate-change-and-energy-transition/. Accessed 19 June 2023
Xinhua (2021) China conducts its 12th. time of Arctic scientific research. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-07/12/content_5624391.htm. Accessed 19 June 2023
Yirong Q (2022) Does environmental policy stringency reduce CO2 emissions? Evidence from high-polluted economies. J Clean Prod 341:130648
Acknowledgements
I wish to thank Anastassia Obydenkova for her excellent comments on early versions of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The author is a solo author; hence, the solo author contributes to the entire article.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
ESM 1
(DOCX 16 kb)
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Y. A blessing or a curse? China’s Arctic involvement and its environmental policy to prevent further climatic change and pollution. Climatic Change 176, 117 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-023-03600-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-023-03600-6