Abstract
Climate change threatens not only the material bases of human societies but also is likely to harm human psychological/emotional well-being. One aspect of this emotional harm may come from how the esthetic properties of environments—especially those stemming from the composition of predominant vegetative cover and cloud patterns—change in regions around the world with shifting climatic patterns. Research has established that humans respond to the fractal dimension of scenes, and that our innate “fractal fluency” leads us to prefer middle-range fractal complexity. Thus, the consequences of climate change for human emotional well-being may vary across regions depending on how the fractal character of landscapes and cloudscapes evolves under new climatic regimes.


Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
No data were used in the development of this paper.
References
Abboushi B, Elzeyadi I, Taylor RP, Sereno ME (2019) Fractals in architecture: the visual interest, preference, and mood response to projected fractal light patterns in interior spaces. J Environ Psychol 61:57–70
Anadon JD, Sala OE, Maestre FT (2014) Climate change will increase savannas at the expense of forests and treeless vegetation in tropical and subtropical Americas. J Ecol 102:1363–1373
Antonovsky A (1979) Health, stress, and coping. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francesco
Brielmann AA, Buras NH, Salingaros NA, Taylor RP (2022) What happens when you walk down the street? Implications of architectural proportions, biophilia, and fractal geometry for urban science. Urban Planning 6:3
Forsythe A, Williams T, Reilly RG (2017) What paint can tell us: a fractal analysis of neurological changes in seven artists. Neuropsychology 31:1–10
IPCC (2021) Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T.K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press. In Press
Juliani AW, Bies AJ, Boydston CR, Taylor RP, Sereno ME (2016) Navigation performance in virtual environments varies with fractal dimension of landscape. J Environ Psychol 47:155–165
Kaplan R, Kaplan S (1989) The experience of nature: a psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Lawrence E et al (2021) The impacts of climate change on mental health and emotional wellbeing. Grantham Institute Briefing Paper No. 36, 2021. http://www.imperial.ac.uk/grantham/publications/briefing-papers/the-impact-of-climate-change-on-mental-health-and-emotional-wellbeing-current-evidence-and-implications-for-policy-and-practice.php. Accessed 26 May 2021.
Lui PP, Fernando GA (2017) Development and initial validation of a multidimensional scale assessing subjective well-being: the well-being scale (WeBS). Psychol Rep 121(1):135–160
Mandelbrot BB (1982) The fractal geometry of nature. WH Freedman, New York
Ostberg S, Boysen LR, Schaphoff S, Lucht W, Gerten D (2018) The biosphere under potential Paris outcomes. Earth’s Future 6:23–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000628
Robles K, Liaw N, Taylor RP, Baldwin D, Sereno ME (2020) A shared fractal aesthetic across development. Human Soc Sci Commun 7:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00648-y
Smith N. (2021) Employees reveal how stress affects their jobs. Businessnewsdaily. Available online: https://www.businessnewsdaily.com/2267-workplace-stress-health-epidemic-perventable-employee-assistance-programs.html. Accessed on 22 December 2021.
Spehar B, Taylor RP (2013) Fractals in art and nature: why do we like them? SPIE. 8651:865118
Spehar B, Walker N, Taylor RP (2016) Taxonomy of individual variations in aesthetic response to fractal patterns. Front Hum Neurosci 10:1–18
Street N, Forsythe A, Reilly RG, Taylor RP, Boydston C, Helmy MS (2016) 4 A complex story—universal preference vs. individual differences shaping aesthetic response to fractal patterns? Front Human Neurosci 10:201
Taylor RP (2003) Fractal expressionism—where art meets science. Art and complexity, Ed. Casti. J. & Karlqvist. A. Elsevier (Amsterdam).
Taylor RP (2006) Reduction of physiological stress using fractal art and architecture. Leonardo 39:245–251
Taylor RP (2021) The potential of biophilic fractal designs to promote health and performance: a review of experiments and applications. Sustainability 13:823–847
Taylor RP, Newell B, Spehar B, Clifford C (2005) Fractals: a resonance between art and nature. Mathematics and culture II. 53–63. Ed. Emmer, M., Springer-Verlag (Berlin)
Taylor RP, Guzman R, Martin TM, Hall G, Micolich AP, Joans D, Scannell BC, Fairbanks MS, Marlow CA (2007) Pattern Recogn Lett 28:695
Trauernicht C, Brook BW, Murphy BP, Williamson GJ, Bowman DMJS (2015) Local and global pyrogeographic evidence that indigenous fire management creates pyrodiversity. Ecol Evol 5(9):1908–1918
Ulrich RS (1984) View from a window may influence surgery. Science 224:420–421
Wilson EO (1984) Biophilia. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Both authors contributed equally to the conception and design of this study. Both authors contributed equally to writing the manuscript and approved the final version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Taylor, R.P., York, R. Fractal shifts and esthetic rifts: climate change and emotional well-being. Climatic Change 173, 16 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-022-03414-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-022-03414-y