Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Modeling the impact of sea level rise on maximum water elevation during storm surge events: a closer look at coastal embayments

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Storm-surge models are commonly used to assess the impacts of hurricanes and coastal storms in coastal areas. Including the impact of the projected future sea level rise (SLR) in these models is a necessary step for a realistic flood risk assessment. Commonly, SLR is superimposed linearly on the simulated water elevation. This approach, while efficient, may lead to inaccuracies. Furthermore, developing a new model with updated data (e.g., boundary conditions, bathymetry) that include the effects of SLR (i.e., nonlinear approach) is time consuming. We compare the linear and nonlinear approaches to include the effect of SLR in predicting maximum water/flood elevations (MWE) as a result of storm surge. After a simplified theoretical analysis, a number of idealized cases based on the typical coastal bodies of water are modeled to assess the impact of SLR on MWE using the linear superposition and nonlinear approaches. Additionally, two case studies are carried out: Narragansett Bay, RI, and Long Island Sound, CT (USA). Results show that for the idealized cases with variable depth, in general, the linear superposition of SLR to MWE is conservative (i.e., predicts a larger flood elevation) relative to the nonlinear approach. However, if a constant depth is considered, results are not consistent (i.e., linear superposition can overestimate or underestimate MWE, and the results depended on the geometry). The simulated MWE from the Narragansett Bay simulation confirms the outcome of idealized cases showing that linear assumption is conservative up to 10% relative to the nonlinear approach. For this study, Hurricane Sandy and a synthetic storm from the US Army Corps of Engineers North Atlantic Comprehensive Coastal Study (NACCS) dataset are simulated. Long Island Sound model results are also consistent with the idealized case. In general, based on the results of the idealized and real case studies, a discrepancy of up to 10% between the linear and nonlinear approaches is expected in estimation of MWE which can be under- or over-estimation of flood elevation, depending on the geometry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding references listed in the manuscript.

Code availability

Not applicable

References

  • Arcement GJ, Schneider VR (1989) Guide for selecting Manning’s roughness coefficients for natural channels and flood plains. US Government Printing Office Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson J, McKee Smith J, Bender C (2013) Sea-level rise effects on storm surge and nearshore waves on the Texas coast: influence of landscape and storm characteristics. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering 139(2):98–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Liu H, Beardsley RC (2003) An unstructured grid, finite-volume, three-dimensional, primitive equations ocean model: application to coastal ocean and estuaries. Journal of atmospheric and Oceanic Technology 20(1):159–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church JA, White NJ (2006) A 20th century acceleration in global sea-level rise. Geophysical Research Letters 33(1)

  • Church JA, White NJ, Coleman R, Lambeck K, Mitrovica JX (2004) Estimates of the regional distribution of sea level rise over the 1950-2000 period. Journal of Climate 17(13):2609–2625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cialone MA, Massey TC, Anderson ME, Grzegorzewski AS, Jensen RE, Cialone A, Mark DJ, Pevey KC, Gunkel BL, McAlpin TO (2015) North Atlantic Coast Comprehensive Study (NACCS) coastal storm model simulations: waves and water levels. Tech. rep, Engineer Research And Development Center Vicksburg MS Coastal And Hydraulics Lab

  • Colle BA, Buonaiuto F, Bowman MJ, Wilson RE, Flood R, Hunter R, Mintz A, Hill D (2008) New York City’s vulnerability to coastal flooding: storm surge modeling of past cyclones. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 89(6):829–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devlin AT, Jay DA, Talke SA, Zaron E (2014) Can tidal perturbations associated with sea level variations in the western Pacific Ocean be used to understand future effects of tidal evolution? Ocean Dynamics 64(8):1093–1120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devlin AT, Jay DA, Talke SA, Zaron ED, Pan J, Lin H (2017) Coupling of sea level and tidal range changes, with implications for future water levels. Scientific Reports 7(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devlin AT, Jay DA, Zaron ED, Talke SA, Pan J, Lin H (2017) Tidal variability related to sea level variability in the Pacific Ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 122(11):8445–8463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devlin AT, Pan J, Lin H (2019) Extended spectral analysis of tidal variability in the North Atlantic Ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 124(1):506–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich J, Kolar R, Luettich RA (2004) Assessment of ADCIRC’s wetting and drying algorithm. In: Developments in Water Science, vol 55, Elsevier, pp 1767–1778

  • Dietrich JC, Muhammad A, Curcic M, Fathi A, Dawson C, Chen SS, Luettich R Jr (2017) Sensitivity of storm surge predictions to atmospheric forcing during Hurricane Isaac. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering 144(1):04017035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding Y, Kuiry SN, Elgohry M, Jia Y, Altinakar MS, Yeh KC (2013) Impact assessment of sea-level rise and hazardous storms on coasts and estuaries using integrated processes model. Ocean Engineering 71:74–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dissanayake D, Ranasinghe R, Roelvink J (2012) The morphological response of large tidal inlet/basin systems to relative sea level rise. Climatic Change 113(2):253–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas BC (1992) Global sea level acceleration. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 97(C8):12699–12706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eakins B, Danielson J, Sutherland M, Mclean S (2015) A framework for a seamless depiction of merged bathymetry and topography along US coasts. In: US HYDRO Conference Proceedings. National Harbor, MD

  • Familkhalili R, Talke SA (2016) The effect of channel deepening on tides and storm surge: a case study of Wilmington, NC. Geophysical Research Letters 43(17):9138–9147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichs CT (2010) Barotropic tides in channelized estuaries. Contemporary Issues in Estuarine physics, 27–61

  • Friedrichs CT, Aubrey DG (1988) Non-linear tidal distortion in shallow well-mixed estuaries: a synthesis. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 27(5):521–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichs CT, Aubrey DG, Speer PE (1990) Impacts of relative sea-level rise on evolution of shallow estuaries. In: Residual currents and long-term transport, Springer, pp 105–122

  • Georgas N, Orton P, Blumberg A, Cohen L, Zarrilli D, Yin L (2014) The impact of tidal phase on Hurricane Sandy’s flooding around New York City and Long Island Sound. Journal of Extreme Events 1(01):1450006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godin G (1988) The resonant period of the Bay of Fundy. Continental Shelf Research 8(8):1005–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grilli A, Spaulding ML, Oakley BA, Damon C (2017) Mapping the coastal risk for the next century, including sea level rise and changes in the coastline: application to Charlestown RI, USA. Natural Hazards 88(1):389–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagen SC, Zundel A, Kojima S (2006) Automatic, unstructured mesh generation for tidal calculations in a large domain. International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics 20(8):593–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinkel J, Aerts JC, Brown S, Jiménez JA, Lincke D, Nicholls RJ, Scussolini P, Sanchez-Arcilla A, Vafeidis A, Addo KA (2018) The ability of societies to adapt to twenty-first-century sea-level rise. Nature Climate Change 8(7):570–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang H, Chen C, Cowles GW, Winant CD, Beardsley RC, Hedstrom KS, Haidvogel DB (2008) FVCOM validation experiments: comparisons with ROMS for three idealized barotropic test problems. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 113(C7)

  • Jelesnianski CP, Chen J, Shaffer WA (1992) SLOSH: sea, lake, and overland surges from hurricanes

  • Jones JE, Davies AM (2008) On the modification of tides in shallow water regions by wind effects. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 113(C5)

  • Kemp AC, Hill TD, Vane CH, Cahill N, Orton PM, Talke SA, Parnell AC, Sanborn K, Hartig EK (2017) Relative sea-level trends in New York City during the past 1500 years. The Holocene 27(8):1169–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouhi S, Hashemi MR, Kian R, Spaulding M, Lewis M, Ginis I (2020) Flood risk in past and future: a case study for the Pawtuxet River’s record-breaking March 2010 flood event. Journal of Flood Risk Management 13(4):e12655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kresning B, Hashemi MR, Neill SP, Green JM, Xue H (2019) The impacts of tidal energy development and sea-level rise in the Gulf of Maine. Energy 187:115942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai C, Baltzer R, Schaffranek R (2002) Conservation-form equations of unsteady open-channel flow. Journal of Hydraulic Research 40(5):567–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence J, Bell R, Blackett P, Stephens S, Allan S (2018) National guidance for adapting to coastal hazards and sea-level rise: anticipating change, when and how to change pathway. Environmental Science & Policy 82:100–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leuven JR, Pierik HJ, van der Vegt M, Bouma TJ, Kleinhans MG (2019) Sea-level-rise-induced threats depend on the size of tide-influenced estuaries worldwide. Nature Climate Change 9(12):986–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Chen C, Guadagnoli D, Georgiou IY (2008) Geometry-induced residual eddies in estuaries with curved channels: observations and modeling studies. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 113(C1)

  • Liu Z, Wang H, Zhang YJ, Magnusson L, Loftis JD, Forrest D (2020) Cross-scale modeling of storm surge, tide, and inundation in mid-Atlantic Bight and New York City during Hurricane Sandy 2021. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 233:106544

  • Luettich R, Westerink J (2007) A parallel advanced circulation model for oceanic coastal and estuarine waters. Tech. rep., Technical report available at http://www.adcirc.org. Accessed 12 Apr 2018

  • Luettich Jr RA, Westerink JJ, Scheffner NW (1992) ADCIRC: an advanced three-dimensional circulation model for shelves, coasts, and estuaries. Report 1. Theory and methodology of ADCIRC-2DDI and ADCIRC-3DL. Tech. rep., Coastal engineering research center Vicksburg MS

  • Marsooli R, Lin N (2018) Numerical modeling of historical storm tides and waves and their interactions along the US East and Gulf Coasts. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 123(5):3844–3874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montes S (1998) Hydraulics of open channel flow. American Society of Civil Engineers, Baltimore, MD (US)

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon T, Ahlstrøm A, Goelzer H, Lipscomb W, Nowicki S (2018) Rising oceans guaranteed: Arctic land ice loss and sea level rise. Current Climate Change Reports 4(3):211–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morang A (2016) Hurricane barriers in New England and New Jersey: history and status after five decades. Journal of Coastal Research 32(1):181–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadal-Caraballo N, Melby J, Gonzalez V, Cox A (2015) North Atlantic Coast Comprehensive Study (NACCS): coastal storm hazards from Virginia to Maine. US Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC), Technical Report ERDC-CHL-TR-15-5

  • Orton P, Vinogradov S, Georgas N, Blumberg A, Lin N, Gornitz V, Little C, Jacob K, Horton R (2015) New York City panel on climate change 2015 report chapter 4: dynamic coastal flood modeling. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1336(1):56–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orton P, Lin N, Gornitz V, Colle B, Booth J, Feng K, Buchanan M, Oppenheimer M, Patrick L (2019) New York City panel on climate change 2019 report chapter 4: coastal flooding. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1439(1):95–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandoe WW, Edge BL (2004) Cohesive sediment transport in the 3D-hydrodynamic-baroclinic circulation model: study case for idealized tidal inlet. Ocean Engineering 31(17–18):2227–2252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park H, Do T, Tomiczek T, Cox DT, van de Lindt JW (2018) Numerical modeling of non-breaking, impulsive breaking, and broken wave interaction with elevated coastal structures: Laboratory validation and inter-model comparisons. Ocean Engineering 158:78–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parris A, Bromirski P, Burkett V, Cayan D, Culver M, Hall J, Horton RM, Knuuti K, Moss R, Obeysekera J, Sallenger A (2012) Global sea level rise scenarios for the US national climate assessment. NOAA Tech Memo OAR CPO

  • Schindelegger M, Green J, Wilmes SB, Haigh ID (2018) Can we model the effect of observed sea level rise on tides? Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 123(7):4593–4609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith JM, Cialone MA, Wamsley TV, McAlpin TO (2010) Potential impact of sea level rise on coastal surges in southeast Louisiana. Ocean Engineering 37(1):37–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soundwater (2019) Long Island Sound Facts. http://soundwater.org, Accessed: 2019-09-30

  • Spaulding ML, Grilli A, Damon C, Crean T, Fugate G, Oakley BA, Stempel P (2016) STORMTOOLS: Coastal Environmental Risk Index (CERI). Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 4(3):54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spaulding ML, Isaji T, Damon C, Fugate G (2017) Application of STORMTOOLS’ simplified flood inundation model with and without sea level rise to RI coastal waters. Coastal Structures and Solutions to Coastal Disasters 2015: Resilient Coastal Communities. American Society of Civil Engineers Reston, VA, pp 126–134

  • Sweet WV, Kopp RE, Weaver CP, Obeysekera J, Horton RM, Thieler ER, Zervas C (2017) Global and regional sea level rise scenarios for the United States

  • Rhode Island Geographic Information System (2015) Topo-bathymetry of Narragansett Bay and Block Island. Accessed online on August 10, 2015

  • Talke SA, Jay DA (2020) Changing tides: the role of natural and anthropogenic factors. Annual Review of Marine Science 12:121–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomassini M, LeMeur D, Saunders R (1998) Near-surface satellite wind observations of hurricanes and their impact on ECMWF model analyses and forecasts. Monthly Weather Review 126(5):1274–1286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres MJ, Reza Hashemi M, Hayward S, Spaulding M, Ginis I, Grilli ST (2018) Role of hurricane wind models in accurate simulation of storm surge and waves. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering 145(1):04018039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Goor M, Zitman T, Wang Z, Stive M (2003) Impact of sea-level rise on the morphological equilibrium state of tidal inlets. Marine Geology 202(3–4):211–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams SJ, Gutierrez B, Robert Thieler E, Pendleton E (2008) Geologic effects and coastal vulnerability to sea-level rise, erosion, and storms

  • Wolf J (2009) Coastal flooding: impacts of coupled wave-surge-tide models. Natural Hazards 49(2):241–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong KC (1990) Sea level variability in Long Island Sound. Estuaries 13(4):362–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xian S, Lin N, Hatzikyriakou A (2015) Storm surge damage to residential areas: a quantitative analysis for Hurricane Sandy in comparison with FEMA flood map. Natural Hazards 79(3):1867–1888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong L, Li M, Zhang DL (2010) How do uncertainties in hurricane model forecasts affect storm surge predictions in a semi-enclosed bay? Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 90(2):61–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was partially funded by the Northeaster Regional Association of Coastal Ocean Observing Systems (NERACOOS) Coastal Resilience Project (0005266). The authors gratefully acknowledge Changsheng Chen from UMASS Dartmouth for providing the NECOFS FVCOM GOM4 mesh and WRF wind data for Hurricane Sandy, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) for supplying hurricane and water level data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Reza Hashemi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kouhi, S., Hashemi, M.R., Spaulding, M. et al. Modeling the impact of sea level rise on maximum water elevation during storm surge events: a closer look at coastal embayments. Climatic Change 171, 31 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-022-03342-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-022-03342-x

Keywords

Navigation