Skip to main content


Log in

A framework for implementing socially just climate adaptation

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript


The previous two decades of scholarship devoted to the role of social justice in climate change adaptation have established an important theoretical basis to evaluate the concept of just adaptation, or, in other words, how the implementation of climate adaptation policy affects socially vulnerable groups. This paper synthesizes insights from relevant literature on urban climate change governance, climate adaptation, urban planning, social justice theory, and policy implementation to develop three propositions concerning the conditions that must occur to implement just adaptation. First, just adaptation requires the inclusion of socially vulnerable populations as full participants with agency to shape the decisions that affect them. Second, just adaptation requires that adaptation framings explicitly recognize the causes of systemic injustice. Third, just adaptation requires a focus on incremental evaluations of implementation to avoid timeframes inconsistent with advancing justice. We then integrate the advocacy coalition framework (ACF) with the just adaptation literature to develop a framework to evaluate the implementation of climate adaptation. We present two novel modifications to the ACF aimed at fostering policy analysis of the previously presented three propositions for implementation of just adaptation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others


  • Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Glob Environ Chang 16(3):268–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN (2016) Place, well-being, and fairness shape priorities for adaptation to climate change. Glob Environ Chang 38:A1–A3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Arnell NW, Tompkins EL (2005) Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Glob Environ Chang 15(2):77–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Paavola J, Huq S, Mace MJ (2006) Fairness in adaptation to climate change. MIT Press, Cambridge

  • Agyeman J (2013) Introducing just sustainabilities: policy, planning, and practice. Zed Books Ltd

  • Anguelovski I, Shi L, Chu E, Gallagher D, Goh K, Lamb Z et al (2016) Equity impacts of urban land use planning for climate adaptation: critical perspectives from the global North and South. J Plan Educ Res 36(3):333–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkan J, Pulido L (2017) Justice: an epistolary essay. Ann Am Assoc Geograph 107(1):33–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulkeley H, Betsill MM (2003) Cities and climate change: urban sustainability and global environmental governance, vol 4. Psychology Press

  • Bulkeley H, Carmin JA, Castan Bronto V, Edwards G, Fuller S (2013) Climate justice and global cities: mapping the emerging discourses. Glob Environ Chang 23:914–925

  • Bullard RD (2018) Dumping in Dixie: race, class, and environmental quality. Westview Press

  • Chu E (2017) Urban climate adaptation and the reshaping of state-society relations: the politics of community knowledge and mobilization in Indore, India. Urban Stud:1–17

  • Davoudi S (2012) Resilience: a bridging concept or a dead end? Plan Theory Pract 13(2):299–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen SH, Nightingale AJ, Eakin H (2015) Reframing adaptation: the political nature of climate change adaptation. Glob Environ Chang 35:523–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fainstein S (2015) Resilience and justice. Int J Urban Reg Res 39(1):157–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Few R, Brown K, Tompkins E (2007) Public participation and climate change adaptation: avoiding the illusion of inclusion. Clim Pol 7(1):46–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C (2006) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Glob Environ Chang 16(3):253–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser N (2014) Justice interruptus: critical reflections on the “postsocialist” condition. Routledge

  • Fung A (2006) Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Adm Rev 66(s1):66–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray B (2003) Framing environmental disputes. In: Gray B Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: frames and cases. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 11–34

  • Harris LM, Chu EK, Ziervogel G (2018) Negotiated resilience. Resilience 6(3):96–214

  • Hjern B (1982) Implementation research. J Public Policy 2:301–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjern B, Porter DO (1981) Implementation structures: a new unit of administrative analysis. Organisation Studies 2–3.

  • Hoffman AJ (2015) How culture shapes the climate change debate. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto

  • Holland B (2017) Procedural justice in local climate adaptation: political capabilities and transformational change. Environ Politics 26(3):391–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes S (2013) Justice in urban climate change adaptation: criteria and application to Delhi. Ecol Soc 18(4):48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hupe P (2014) What happens on the ground: persistent issues in implementation research. Public Policy Admin 29(2):164–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Working Group II (2014) Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. IPCC Working Group II

  • Jenkins-Smith HC, Nohrstedt D, Weible CM, Ingold K (2017) The advocacy coalition framework: an overview of the research program. In: Weible CM, Sabatier PA (eds) Theories of the policy process, 4th edn. Westview press, pp 135–171

  • Kelly PM, Adger WN (2000) Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation. Clim Chang 47(4):325–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klinsky S et al (2016) Why equity is fundamental in climate change policy research. Glob Environ Chang.

  • Kythreotis AP, Bristow GI (2016) The ‘resilience trap’: exploring the practical utility of resilience for climate change adaptation in UK city-regions. Reg Stud.

  • Lewicki RJ, Saunders DM, Barry B (2015) Negotiation, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill Education, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom CL (1968) The policy-making process. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipskey M (1980) Street level bureaucracy. The dilemmas of individuals in the public service. Russel Sage Foundation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mnookin RH, Peppet SR, Tulumello AS (2001) Beyond winning: negotiating to create value in deals and disputes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison TH, Adger WN, Brown K, Lemos MC, Huitema D, Phelps J, Evans L, Cohen P, Song AM, Turner R, Quinn T, Hughes TP (2019) The black box of power in polycentric environmental governance. Glob Environ Chang 57:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser SC, Boykoff MS (2013) Successful adaptation to climate change: linking science and policy in a rapidly changing world. Routledge

  • Nussbaum MC (2011) Creating capabilities. Harvard University Press

  • Paavola J (2008) Science and social justice in the governance of adaptation to climate change. Environ Politics 17(4):644–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paavola J, Adger WN (2006) Fair adaptation to climate change. Ecol Econ 56(4):594–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson JJ, Thaler T, Hoffman M, Hughes S, Oels A, Chu E, Mert A, Huitema D, Burch S, Jordan A (2018) Political feasibility of 1.5C societal transformations: the role of social justice. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 31:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelling M (2011) Adaptation to climate change: from resilience to transformation. Routledge

  • Pelling M, O’Brien K, Matyas D (2015) Adaptation and transformation. Clim Chang 133(1):113–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressman J, Wildavsky A (1979) Implementation: how great expectations are dashed. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam LL, Wondollek JM (2003) Intractability: definitions, dimensions, and distinctions. In: Lewicki R (ed) Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: concepts and cases, pp 35–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press

  • Roberts JT (2009) The international dimension of climate justice and the need for international adaptation funding. Environ Justice 2(4):185–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe G, Frewer LJ (2000) Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Sci Technol Hum Values 25(1):3–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier P (1986) Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: a critical analysis and suggested synthesis. J Public Policy 6(1):21–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier P, Jenkins-Smith (2011) Policy change and learning: an advocacy coalition approach. San Francisco and Oxford. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier P, Mazmanian D (1979) The implementation of public policy: a framework of analysis. Policy Stud J 8(4):538–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosberg D (2009) Defining environmental justice: theories, movements, and nature. Oxford University Press

  • Schlosberg D (2012) Climate justice and capabilities: a framework for adaptation policy. Ethics Int Aff 26(4):445–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosberg D, Collins LB, Niemeyer S (2017). Adaptation policy and community discourse: risk, vulnerability, and just transformation. Environmental Politics 26(3):413–437

  • Sen AK (2009) The idea of justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

  • Sewell GC (2005) Actors, coalitions and the framework convention on climate change. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Shafritz J, Borick C, Russell EW, Hyde AC (2016) Introducing public administration. Routledge

  • Shi L, Chu E, Anguelovski I, Aylett A, Debats J, Goh K et al (2016) Roadmap towards justice in urban climate adaptation research. Nat Clim Chang 6(2):131–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Glob Environ Chang 16(3):282–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschakert P, Dietrich K (2010) Anticipatory learning for climate change adaptation and resilience. Ecol Soc 15(2):11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschakert P, van Oort B, St. Clair AL, LaMadrid A (2013) Inequality and transformation analyses: a complementary lens for addressing vulnerability to climate change. Clim Dev 5(4):340–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young IM (2011) Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey T. Malloy.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Malloy, J.T., Ashcraft, C.M. A framework for implementing socially just climate adaptation. Climatic Change 160, 1–14 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: