Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Insurance for the future? Potential avian community resilience in cities across Europe


Urbanization is affecting avian biodiversity across the planet and potentially increasing species vulnerability to climate change. Identifying the resilience of urban bird communities to climate change is critical for making conservation decisions. This study explores the pattern in bird communities across nine European cities and examines the projected impact of climate change in order to detect communities facing a higher risk of functional change in the future. First, generalized linear mixed models were used to explore the potential resilience of urban bird communities in nine European cities and the effects of land cover, latitude, abundance of potential predators (dogs and cats), and bird species richness in each trophic guild. Bird community resilience was represented by an index of functional evenness, because it indicates relatively uniform functional space within the species assemblages. Second, bird community resilience in each city was compared with projected changes in temperature and precipitation for the year 2070 to explore potential future threats to conservation. The results showed that community resilience was not significantly associated with land use or abundance of predator. The number of granivorous and granivorous-insectivorous species increases the potential resilience of the community, while the numbers of insectivores, carnivores, and omnivores was negatively correlated with resilience. Of the nine cities, Madrid and Toledo (Spain) are projected to experience the largest change in temperature and precipitation, although their bird communities are characterized by relative high resilience. In contrast, Rovaniemi, at the Arctic Circle (Finland) is projected to experience the second highest increase in temperature among the focused cities, and their bird communities are characterized by low resilience. These findings indicate the importance of future research on the combined effect of functional diversity of species assemblages and climate change on urban biodiversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3


  1. Alberti M, Marzluff JM (2004) Ecological resilience in urban ecosystems: linking urban patterns to human and ecological functions. Urban Ecosyst 7:241–265

  2. Andrew SC, Awasthy M, Griffith AD et al (2018) Clinal variation in avian body size is better explained by summer maximum temperatures during development than by cold winter temperatures. Auk 135:206–217.

  3. Aronson MFJ, La Sorte FA, Nilon CH et al (2014) A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers. Proc R Soc London B - Biol Sci 281:20133330.

  4. Askeyev O, Askeyev A, Askeyev I (2018) Recent climate change has increased forest winter bird densities in East Europe. Ecol Res 33:445–456.

  5. Barbet-Massin M, Jetz W (2015) The effect of range changes on the functional turnover, structure and diversity of bird assemblages under future climate scenarios. Glob Chang Biol 21:2917–2928.

  6. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2014) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4 - R Package

  7. Bellard C, Thuiller W, Leroy B et al (2013) Will climate change promote future invasions? Glob Chang Biol 19:3740–3748.

  8. Bibby CJ, Burgess ND, Hill DA (1992) Bird census techniques (Google eBook). Academic Press

  9. Brown PT, Caldeira K (2017) Greater future global warming inferred from Earth’s recent energy budget. Nature 552:45–50.

  10. Bulla L (1994) An index of evenness and its associated diversity measure. Oikos 70:167–171

  11. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer Verlag, New York, NY

  12. Butler RW, Taylor W (2005) A review of climate change impacts on birds. USDA For Serv Gen Tech Resp 191:1107–1109

  13. Clergeau P, Croci S, Jokimäki J et al (2006) Avifauna homogenisation by urbanisation: analysis at different European latitudes. Biol Conserv 127:336–344.

  14. Colles A, Liow LH, Prinzing A (2009) Are specialists at risk under environmental change? Neoecological, paleoecological and phylogenetic approaches. Ecol Lett 12:849–863.

  15. Conrey RY, Skagen SK, Yackel Adams AA et al (2016) Extremes of heat, drought and precipitation depress reproductive performance in shortgrass prairie passerines. Ibis (Lond 1859) 158:614–629.

  16. Cramp S, Perrins C (1994) The birds of the Western Palearctic. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

  17. Crooks KR, Suarez AV, Bolger DT (2004) Avian assemblages along a gradient of urbanization in a highly fragmented landscape. Biol Conserv 115:451–462.

  18. Crutzen PJ, Stoermer EF (2000) The “Anthropocene.”. Glob Chang Newsl 41:17–18

  19. Cumming GS, Barnes G, Perz S et al (2005) An exploratory framework for the empirical measurement of resilience. Ecosystems 8:975–987.

  20. de Bello F, Lavorel S, Gerhold P et al (2010) A biodiversity monitoring framework for practical conservation of grasslands and shrublands. Biol Conserv 143:9–17.

  21. De Smith MJ, Goodchild MF, Longley PA (2007) Univariate classification schemes. In: geospatial analysis—a comprehensive guide to principles, techniques and software tools, 2nd edn. Troubador Publishing Ltd, p 516

  22. Devictor V, Julliard R, Couvet D et al (2007) Functional homogenization effect of urbanization on bird communities. Conserv Biol 21:741–751.

  23. Díaz M, Møller AP, Flensted-Jensen E et al (2013) The geography of fear: a latitudinal gradient in anti-predator escape distances of birds across Europe. PLoS One 8:e64634.

  24. Dormann CF, McPherson JM, Araújo MB et al (2007) Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. Ecography (Cop) 30:609–628.

  25. Eglington SM, Pearce-Higgins JW (2012) Disentangling the relative importance of changes in climate and land-use intensity in driving recent bird population trends. PLoS One 7:e30407.

  26. Elmqvist T, Folke C, Nystrom M et al (2003) Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience. Front Ecol Environ 1:488–494.

  27. Elton CS (1958) The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Methuen, London, UK

  28. ESRI (2012) ArcGIS desktop: release 10.1. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute

  29. Evans KL, Gaston KJ, Frantz AC et al (2009a) Independent colonization of multiple urban centres by a formerly forest specialist bird species. Proc R Soc London B - Biol Sci 276:2403–2410

  30. Evans KL, Newson SE, Gaston KJ (2009b) Habitat influences on urban avian assemblages. Ibis (Lond 1859) 151:19–39

  31. Ferenc M, Sedláček O, Fuchs R et al (2014) Are cities different? Patterns of species richness and beta diversity of urban bird communities and regional species assemblages in Europe. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 23:479–489.

  32. Foley JA, Defries R, Asner GP et al (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309:570–474.

  33. Folke C, Carpenter S, Elmqvist T et al (2002) Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio 31:437–440

  34. Folke C, Carpenter SR, Walker B et al (2010) Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecol Soc 15:20

  35. Garcillán PP, Dana ED, Rebman JP, Peñas J (2014) Effects of alien species on homogenization of urban floras across continents : a tale of two mediterranean cities on two different continents. Plant Ecol Evol 147:3–9.

  36. Gitay H, Wilson JB, Lee WG (1996) Species redundancy: a redundant concept? J Ecol 84:121–124

  37. Godet L, Gaüzère P, Jiguet F, Devictor V (2015) Dissociating several forms of commonness in birds sheds new light on biotic homogenization. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 24:416–426.

  38. Graham MH (2003) Confronting multicollinearity in ecological multiple regression. Ecology 84:2809–2815.

  39. Grimm NB, Foster D, Groffman P et al (2008) The changing landscape: ecosystem responses to urbanization and pollution across climatic and societal gradients. Front Ecol Environ 6:264–272.

  40. Haegeman B, Arnoldi J-F, Wang S, et al (2016) Resilience, invariability, and ecological stability across levels of organization. bioRxiv 1–15.

  41. Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–23.

  42. Howard C, Stephens PA, Pearce-Higgins JW et al (2015) The drivers of avian abundance: patterns in the relative importance of climate and land use. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 24:1249–1260.

  43. Hulme M, Mitchell J, Ingram W et al (1999) Climate change scenarios for global impacts studies. Glob Environ Chang 9:S3–S19.

  44. Huntley B, Collingham YC, Willis SG, Green RE (2008) Potential impacts of climatic change on European breeding birds. PLoS One 3:e1439.

  45. Ibáñez-Álamo JD, Rubio E, Benedetti Y, Morelli F (2016) Global loss of avian evolutionary uniqueness in urban areas. Glob Chang Biol 23:2990–2998.

  46. Ives CD, Lentini PE, Threlfall CG et al (2016) Cities are hotspots for threatened species. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 25:117–126.

  47. Jokimäki J, Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki M-L (2003) Spatial similarity of urban bird communities: a multiscale approach. J Biogeogr 30:1183–1193

  48. Jokimäki J, Suhonen J, Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki M-L (2018) Landscape and urban planning urban core areas are important for species conservation: a European-level analysis of breeding bird species. Landsc Urban Plan 178:73–81.

  49. Kang W, Minor ES, Park C, Lee D (2015) Effects of habitat structure, human disturbance, and habitat connectivity on urban forest bird communities. Urban Ecosyst 18:857–870.

  50. Kéry M, Royle JA, Schmid H (2005) Modeling avian abundance from replicated counts using binomial mixture models. Ecol Appl 15:1450–1461.

  51. Kim HH (1992) Urban heat island. Int J Remote Sens 13:2319–2336.

  52. Knop E (2016) Biotic homogenization of three insect groups due to urbanization. Glob Chang Biol 22:228–236.

  53. Kosman E, Burgio KR, Presley SJ et al (2019). Conservation prioritization based on trait‐based metrics illustrated with global parrot distributions. Divers Distrib 25:1156–1165.

  54. La Sorte FA, ML MK, Pyšek P (2007) Compositional similarity among urban floras within and across continents: biogeographical consequences of human-mediated biotic interchange. Glob Chang Biol 13:913–921.

  55. Laliberté E, Legendre P, Shipley B (2015) Measuring functional diversity (FD) from multiple traits, and other tools for functional ecology: R package version 1.0-12

  56. Lauwaet D, Hooyberghs H, Maiheu B et al (2015) Detailed urban heat island projections for cities worldwide: dynamical downscaling CMIP5 global climate models. Climate 3:391–415.

  57. Lee M-B, Martin JA (2017) Avian species and functional diversity in agricultural landscapes: does landscape heterogeneity matter? PLoS One 12:e0170540.

  58. Legendre P (1993) Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm? Ecology 74:1659–1673

  59. Legras G, Gaertner J-C (2018) Assessing functional evenness with the FEve index: a word of warning. Ecol Indic 90:257–260.

  60. Lewis SL, Maslin MA (2015) Defining the Anthropocene. Nature 519:171–180.

  61. Loreau M (2004) Does functional redundancy exist? Oikos 104:606–611.

  62. Loss SR, Ruiz MO, Brawn JD (2009) Relationships between avian diversity, neighborhood age, income, and environmental characteristics of an urban landscape. Biol Conserv 142:2578–2585.

  63. Lu GY, Wong DW (2008) An adaptive inverse-distance weighting spatial interpolation technique. Comput Geosci 34:1044–1055.

  64. Maechler M, Rousseeuw P, Struyf A, et al (2018) Cluster: cluster analysis basics and extensions. R package version 2.0.7–1

  65. Magurran A (2004) Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK

  66. Manly BFJ (2006) Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology, third edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York, NY

  67. Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27:209–220

  68. Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (2001) A historical perspective on urban bird research: trend, terms, and approaches. In: Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (eds) Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer, New York, NY, pp 20–47

  69. Mason NWH, Mouillot D, Lee WG, Wilson JB (2005) Functional richness, functional evenness and functional divergence: the primary of functional components diversity. Oikos 111:112–118.

  70. Mazerolle MJ (2016) AICcmodavg: model selection and multimodel inference based on (Q)AIC(c). R package

  71. McKinney M (1997) Extinction vulnerability and selectivity: combining ecological and paleontological views. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:495–516.

  72. McKinney ML (2002) Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. Bioscience 52:883–890.[0883:UBAC]2.0.CO;2

  73. McKinney ML (2006) Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol Conserv 127:247–260.

  74. McKinney ML, Lockwood JL (1999) Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the nextmass extinction. Trends Ecol Evol 14:450–453

  75. Miller JR, Hobbs RJ (2002) Conservation where people live and work. Conserv Biol 16:330–337.

  76. Møller AP, Díaz M (2017) Avian preference for close proximity to human habitation and its ecological consequences. Curr Zool:zox073.

  77. Møller AP, Berthold P, Fiedler W (2010) Effects of climate change on birds. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

  78. Møller AP, Díaz M, Flensted-Jensen E et al (2015) Urbanized birds have superior establishment success in novel environments. Oecologia 178:943–950.

  79. Morelli F, Tryjanowski P (2016) The dark side of the “redundancy hypothesis” and ecosystem assessment. Ecol Complex 28:222–229.

  80. Morelli F, Bussière R, Goławski A et al (2015) Saving the best for last: differential usage of impaled prey by red-backed shrike (Lanius collurio) during the breeding season. Behav Process 119:6–13.

  81. Morelli F, Benedetti Y, Ibáñez-Álamo JD et al (2016) Evidence of evolutionary homogenization of bird communities in urban environments across Europe. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 25:1284–1293.

  82. Morelli F, Benedetti Y, Møller AP, Fuller RA (2019) Measuring avian specialization. Ecol Evol 9:8378–8386.

  83. Moss RH, Nakicenovic N, O’Neill BC (2008) Towards new scenarios for analysis of emissions, climate change, impacts, and response strategies. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland

  84. Mouchet MA, Villéger S, Mason NWH, Mouillot D (2010) Functional diversity measures: an overview of their redundancy and their ability to discriminate community assembly rules. Funct Ecol 24:867–876.

  85. NCAR Community (2012) Climate change scenarios, version 2.0. In: Community Clim. Syst. Model. version 3.0. http// NCAR/UCAR. Access Date: 25/05/2018

  86. Oke TR (1973) City size and the urban heat island. Atmos Environ 7:769–779.

  87. Oksanen J, Guillaume Blanchet F, Kindt R, et al (2016) Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.3-4. 291

  88. Opdam P, Wascher D (2004) Climate change meets habitat fragmentation: linking landscape and biogeographical scale levels in research and conservation. Biol Conserv 117:285–297.

  89. Parmesan C (2006) Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:637–669.

  90. Pautasso M, Dinetti M (2009) Avian species richness, human population and protected areas across Italy’s regions. Environ Conserv 36:22–31.

  91. Pauw A, Louw K (2012) Urbanization drives a reduction in functional diversity in a guild of nectar-feeding birds. Ecol Soc 17:27.

  92. Pearman PB, Lavergne S, Roquet C et al (2014) Phylogenetic patterns of climatic, habitat and trophic niches in a European avian assemblage. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 23:414–424.

  93. Petchey OL, Hector A, Gaston KJ (2004) How do different measures of functional diversity perform? Ecology 85:847–857.

  94. Pohlert T (2014) The pairwise multiple comparison of mean ranks package (PMCMR). R package version 4.3

  95. Princé K, Zuckerberg B (2015) Climate change in our backyards : the reshuffling of North America ’ s winter bird communities. Glob Chang Biol 21:572–585.

  96. Princé K, Lorrillière R, Barbet-Massin M, Jiguet F (2013) Predicting the fate of French bird communities under agriculture and climate change scenarios. Environ Sci Pol 33:120–132.

  97. R Development Core Team (2019) R: a language and environment for statistical computing

  98. Reynolds SJ, Galbraith JA, Smith JA, Jones DN (2017) Garden bird feeding: insights and prospects from a north-south comparison of this global urban phenomenon. Front Ecol Evol 5:24.

  99. Ricotta C, Bacaro G, Moretti M (2014) A new measure of functional evenness and some of its properties. PLoS One 9:e104060.

  100. Safi K, Armour-Marshall K, Baillie JEM, Isaac NJB (2013) Global patterns of evolutionary distinct and globally endangered amphibians and mammals. PLoS One 8:e63582.

  101. Saino N, Ambrosini R, Rubolini D et al (2011) Climate warming, ecological mismatch at arrival and population decline in migratory birds. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 278:835–842.

  102. Schaefer HC, Jetz W, Böhning-Gaese K (2008) Impact of climate change on migratory birds: community reassembly versus adaptation. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 17:38–49.

  103. Schmiegelow FKA, Mönkkönen M (2002) Habitat loss and fragmentation in dynamic landscapes: avian perspectives from the boreal forest. Ecol Appl 12:375–389

  104. Schütz C, Schulze CH (2015) Functional diversity of urban bird communities: effects of landscape composition, green space area and vegetation cover. Ecol Evol 5:5230–5239.

  105. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2012) Cities and biodiversity outlook: a global assessment of the links between urbanization, biodiversity, and ecosystem services. Montreal, Canada

  106. Shannon CE (1948) The mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27:379–423

  107. Shea K, Chesson P (2002) Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 17:170–176.

  108. Shochat E, Lerman S, Fernández-Juricic E (2010) Birds in urban ecosystems: population dynamics, community structure, biodiversity, and conservation. In: Aitkenhead-Peterson J, Volder A (eds) Agronomy monograph 55. Urban ecosystem ecology. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp 75–86

  109. Siikamäki P (1996) Nestling growth and mortality of pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca) in relation to weather and breeding effort. Ibis (Lond 1859) 138:471–478

  110. Skagen SK, Adams AAY (2012) Weather effects on avian breeding performance and implications of climate change. Ecol Appl 22:1131–1145.

  111. Sklenicka P (2016) Classification of farmland ownership fragmentation as a cause of land degradation: a review on typology, consequences, and remedies. Land Use Policy 57:694–701

  112. Spears BM, Ives SC, Angeler DG et al (2015) Effective management of ecological resilience—are we there yet? J Appl Ecol 52:1311–1315.

  113. Spellerberg IFIF (1998) Ecological effects of roads and traffic: a literature review. Glob Ecol Biogeogr Lett 7:317–333

  114. Stephens PA, Mason LR, Green RE et al (2016) Consistent response of bird populations to climate change on two continents. Science 352:84–87.

  115. Storchová L, Hořák D (2018) Life-history characteristics of European birds. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 27:400–406.

  116. Terborgh J, Winter B (1980) Some causes of extinction. In: Soule M, Wilcox B (eds) Conservation biology: an evolutionary-ecological perspective, 1st edn. Sinauer Associates Inc, New York, NY, pp 119–133

  117. Trautmann S (2018) Climate change impacts on bird species. In: Tietze DT (ed) Bird species—how they arise, modify and vanish, 1st edn. Springer, pp 217–234

  118. Triola MF (2012) Elementary statistics, 12th edn. Pearson International, London, UK

  119. Tryjanowski P, Karg M, Karg J (2003) Food of the red-backed shrike Lanius collurio: a comparison of three methods of diet analysis. Acta Ornithol 38:59–64

  120. Tryjanowski P, Skórka P, Sparks TH et al (2015) Urban and rural habitats differ in number and type of bird feeders and in bird species consuming supplementary food. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:15097–15103.

  121. Vázquez-Reyes LD, del Coro Arizmendi M, Godínez-Álvarez HO et al (2017) Directional effects of biotic homogenization of bird communities in Mexican seasonal forests. Condor 119:275–288.

  122. Villéger S, Mason NWH, Mouillot D (2008) New multidimensional functional diversity indices for a multifaceted framework in functional ecology. Ecology 89:2290–2301.

  123. Violle C, Navas M-LL, Vile D et al (2007) Let the concept of trait be functional! Oikos 116:882–892.

  124. Visser ME, Holleman LJM, Caro SP (2009) Temperature has a causal effect on avian timing of reproduction. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 276:2323–2331.

  125. Voříšek P, Klvaňová A, Wotton S, Gregory RD (2010) A best practice guide for wild bird monitoring schemes. Pan-European Common Bird Monitoring Scheme (PECMBS), Bruxelles, Belgium

  126. Wilson MC, Chen X-Y, Corlett RT et al (2016) Habitat fragmentation and biodiversity conservation: key findings and future challenges. Landsc Ecol 31:219–227.

  127. Zerbe S, Maurer U, Schmitz S, Sukopp H (2003) Biodiversity in Berlin and its potential for nature conservation. Landsc Urban Plan 62:139–148

  128. Zuckerberg B, Ribic CA, McCauley LA (2018) Effects of temperature and precipitation on grassland bird nesting success as mediated by patch size. Conserv Biol 32:872–882.

Download references


We are grateful to all people who helped observers during the field work, as well as the reviewers and editors for their very constructive suggestions which helped us to improve the readability of our study


F.M. and Y.B. were financially supported by the Czech Science Foundation GAČR (project number 18-16738S).

Author information

Correspondence to Federico Morelli.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material


(DOC 2160 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morelli, F., Benedetti, Y., Ibáñez-Álamo, J.D. et al. Insurance for the future? Potential avian community resilience in cities across Europe. Climatic Change (2020).

Download citation


  • Biotic homogenization
  • Bird diversity
  • Community resilience
  • Conservation
  • Functional evenness
  • Urbanization