Advertisement

The contribution of technological diffusion to climate change mitigation: a network-based approach

  • Antoine MandelEmail author
  • Solmaria Halleck Vega
  • Dan-Xia Wang
Article

Abstract

We propose a novel approach to quantify the contribution of technological diffusion to climate change mitigation. First, we use a parametric model of epidemic diffusion to estimate from micro-level data the determinants and the structure of the networks of diffusion for three key mitigation technologies: electro-mobility, renewable energy and agriculture. We then simulate the propagation of new technological vintages on these networks and quantify the reduction of emissions induced by the diffusion process using a tailored feedback centrality measure labelled “emission centrality”. Finally, we investigate how new forms of international collaboration such as climate clubs can contribute to mitigation by catalysing the adoption of new technologies. Our approach can be used directly to measure the contribution of technological diffusion to mitigation or indirectly by providing estimates of global technological diffusion to integrated assessment models.

JEL classification

O33 Q54 Q55 C61 C63 

Notes

Supplementary material

10584_2019_2517_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (489 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 488 kb)

References

  1. Albert R, Barabási A-L (2002) Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev Mod Phys 74(1):47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archibugi D, Coco A (2004) A new indicator of technological capabilities for developed and developing countries (Arco). World Dev 32(4):629–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balint T, Lamperti F, Mandel A, Napoletano M, Roventini A, Sapio A (2017) Complexity and the economics of climate change: a survey and a look forward. Ecol EconGoogle Scholar
  4. Battiston S, Puliga M, Kaushik R, Tasca P, Caldarelli G (2012) Debtrank: too central to fail? Financial networks, the fed and systemic risk. Sci Rep 2:541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bloch F, Jackson MO, Tebaldi P (2017) Centrality measures in networks. Available at SSRN 2749124Google Scholar
  6. De Cian E, Bosetti V, Tavoni M (2012) Technology innovation and diffusion in less than ideal climate policies: an assessment with the witch model. Clim Chang 114(1):121–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. de Coninck H, Sagar A (2015) Making sense of policy for climate technology development and transfer. Clim Pol 15:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. EVvolumes (2017) The electric vehicle world sales database. http://www.ev-volumes.com/
  9. FAO (2018) Dataset of agricultural inputs. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data. Accessed 01 Feb 2019
  10. Glachant M, Dechezleprêtre A (2017) What role for climate negotiations on technology transfer? Clim Pol 17(8):962–981. 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gomez Rodriguez M, Leskovec J, Krause A (2010) Inferring networks of diffusion and influence. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, New York, pp 1019–1028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grubb M, De Coninck H, Sagar AD (2015) From Lima to Paris, part 2: injecting ambition. Clim Pol 15(4):413–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Halleck-Vega SH, Mandel A (2018) Technology diffusion and climate policy: a network approach and its application to wind energy. Ecol Econ 145:461–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Halleck-Vega S, Mandel A, Millock K (2018) Accelerating diffusion of climate-friendly technologies: a network perspective. Ecol Econ 152:235–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hovi J, Sprinz DF, Sælen H, Underdal A (2016) Climate change mitigation: a role for climate clubs? Palgrave Communications 2:16020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jackson MO (2010) Social and economic networks. Princeton university press, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Keohane RO, Victor DG (2016) Cooperation and discord in global climate policy. Nat Clim Chang 6(6):570–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lamperti F, Dosi G, Napoletano M, Roventini A, Sapio A (2018) Faraway, so close: coupled climate and economic dynamics in an agent-based integrated assessment model. Ecol Econ 150:315–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nordhaus W (2015) Climate clubs: overcoming free-riding in international climate policy. Am Econ Rev 105(4):1339–1370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. NSF-Kellogg-Institute (2018) Economic Integration Agreements Database 4. https://kellogg.nd.edu/nsf-kellogg-institute-data-base-economic-integration-agreements. Accessed 01 Feb 2019
  21. Paroussos L, Mandel A, Fragkiadakis K, Fragkos P, Hinkel J, Vrontisi Z (2019) Climate clubs and the macro-economic benefits of international cooperation on climate policy. Nature Climate Change 9, 542:546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tavoni M, De Cian E, Luderer G, Steckel JC, Waisman H (2012) The value of technology and of its evolution towards a low carbon economy. Climatic Change, 114(1), 39–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. WindPower (2016). Wind Power database, retrieved https://www.thewindpower.net/. Accessed 01 Feb 2019
  24. WRI (2018). CAIT Climate Data Explorer, retrieved from https://cait.wri.org/. Accessed 01 Feb 2019
  25. Wu X, Kumar A, Sheldon D, Zilberstein S (2013) Parameter Learning for Latent Network Diffusion. Proceedings of the Twenty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), 2923–2930Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Paris School of EconomicsUniversité Paris 1 Panthéon-SorbonneParisFrance
  2. 2.Climate Finance AlphaParisFrance
  3. 3.Centre d’économie de la SorbonneCNRSParisFrance

Personalised recommendations