The turbulent world of resilience: interpretations and themes for transdisciplinary dialogue

Abstract

Resilience has experienced exponential growth in scholarship and practice over the past several decades. We conduct a meta-analysis of recent review papers on resilience from all relevant fields to distill key themes emanating from both research and practice. These themes reflect prevalent debates, trends and insights from the thousands of underlying papers. The seven themes are: 1) the distinction between resilience as a system trait, process, or outcome; 2) the importance of resilience as a strategy for dealing with uncertainty; 3) a shift from understanding resilience to active resilience building; 4) the incorporation of transformation into resilience; 5) the increasingly normative interpretation of resilience; 6) the growing emphasis on measuring and evaluating resilience; and 7) the mounting critiques of the resilience agenda demanding attention. We discuss each in detail and find that they help explain both why resilience has attracted widespread attention, but also why it is an increasingly contested concept. We offer several steps to engage in productive dialogue across differences in resilience interpretations and conclude that this interand transdisciplinary dialogue is the difficult and necessary work that must be done, if resilience scholarship and practice is to advance in productive ways in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. 1.

    March 28, 2017 www.envirodatagov.org

  2. 2.

    These search terms reflected the expertise of Aspen workshop invitees and—inter alia—the expertise of this author team.

  3. 3.

    It is precisely this opportunity afforded by resilience as a boundary object that brought the transdisciplinary group of researchers and practitioners together in Aspen, resulting in a week of grappling with imprecise or divergent meanings and searching for mutual understanding.

References

  1. AGCI (2015a) Fostering dialogue to support community resilience. Resilience Road Marker #1: Ideas for Implementation from Research & Practice

  2. AGCI (2015b) The possibility of resilience. resilience road marker #2: ideas for implementation from research & practice

  3. Ahern J (2011) From fail-safe to safe-to-fail: sustainability and resilience in the new urban world. Landsc Urban Plan 100:341–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alexander DE (2013) Resilience and disaster risk reduction: an etymological journey. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13:2707–2716. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2707-2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Angeler DG, Allen CR, Barichievy C et al (2016) Review: quantifying resilience: management applications of discontinuity theory. J Appl Ecol 53:688–698. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Angell E (2014) Psychological resilience in clinical practice: a discussion. Clin Psychol Forum 260:12–15

    Google Scholar 

  7. Angell GB, Jones GM (2003) Recidivism, risk, and resiliency among North American Indian probationers, parolees, and former prisoners: An examination of the Lumbee First Nation. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work 12: 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1300/J051v12n02_04

  8. Arora-Jonsson S (2016) Does resilience have a culture? Ecocultures and the politics of knowledge production. Ecol Econ 121:98–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bahadur AV, Ibrahim M, Tanner T (2013) Characterising resilience: unpacking the concept for tackling climate change and development. Clim Dev 5:55–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2012.762334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Beck U (2016) The metamorphosis of the world. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bene C, Newsham A, Davies M et al (2014) Review article: resilience, poverty, and development. J Int Dev 26:598–623. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bergström J, van Winsen R, Henriqson E (2015) On the rationale of resilience in the domain of safety: a literature review. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 141:131–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bhamra R, Dani S, Burnard K (2011) Resilience: the concept, a literature review and future directions. Int J Prod Res 49:5375–5393. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.563826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Biggs R, Schlüter M, Biggs D et al (2012) Toward principles for enhancing the resilience of ecosystem services. Annu Rev Environ Resour 37:421–448. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-051211-123836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bohm D (1996) On dialogue. Routledge, London and New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brand FS, Jax K (2007) Focusing the meaning(s) of resilience: resilience as a descriptive concept and a boundary object. Ecol Soc 12:23 https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art23/

  17. Brown K (2014) Global environmental change I: a social turn for resilience? Prog Hum Geogr 38:107–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132513498837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Brown K, Westaway E (2011) Agency, capacity, and resilience to environmental change: lessons from human development, well-being, and disasters. Annu Rev Environ Resour 36:321–342. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-052610-092905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Brownlee K, Rawana J, Franks J et al (2013) A systematic review of strengths and resilience outcome literature relevant to children and adolescents. Child Adolesc Soc Work J 30:435–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-013-0301-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cabel JF, Oelofse M (2012) An indicator framework for assessing agroecosystem resilience. Ecol Soc 17(1):18. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04666-170118

    Google Scholar 

  21. Coaffee J, Clarke J (2015) On securing the generational challenge of urban resilience. Town Plan Rev 86:249–255. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2015.16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Deppisch S, Hasibovic S (2013) Social-ecological resilience thinking as a bridging concept in transdisciplinary research on climate-change adaptation. Nat Hazards 67:117–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9821-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Evans B, Reid J (2015) Exhausted by resilience: response to the commentaries. Resilience 3:154–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693293.2015.1022991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fletcher D, Sarkar M (2013) Psychological resilience: a review and critique of definitions, concepts, and theory. Eur Psychol 18:12–23. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Flood S, Schechtman J (2014) The rise of resilience: evolution of a new concept in coastal planning in Ireland and the US. Ocean Coast Manag 102:19–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.08.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Francis R, Bekera B (2014) A metric and frameworks for resilience analysis of engineered and infrastructure systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 121:90–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2013.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fujimura J (1992) Crafting science: standardized packages, boundary objects, and “translation”. In: Pickering A (ed) Science as a Culture and Practice. Chicago University Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gillard R (2014) Questioning the diffusion of resilience discourses in pursuit of transformational change. Glob Environ Polit 16:13–20. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Harris LM, Chu EK, Ziervogel G (2017) Negotiated resilience. Resilience, online first, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693293.2017.1353196

  30. Hassler U, Kohler N (2014) Resilience in the built environment. Build Res Inf 42:119–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2014.873593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Herzig M, Chasin L (2006) Fostering dialogue across divides. Watert Public Conversations Proj 188

  32. Holling C (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Isaacs W (1999) dialogue: the art of thinking together. Currency Books, New York City

    Google Scholar 

  34. Island Press, Kresge Foundation (2015) Bounce forward: urban resilience in the era of climate change. A strategy paper. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jarvie J, Sutarto R, Syam D, Jeffery P (2015) Lessons for Africa from urban climate change resilience building in Indonesia. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 13:19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Johnson C, Blackburn S (2014) Advocacy for urban resilience: UNISDR’s making cities resilient campaign. Environ Urban 26:29–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247813518684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kinzig AP (2001) Bridging disciplinary divides to address environmental and intellectual challenges. Ecosystems 4(8):709–715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-001-0039-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Leichenko R (2011) Climate change and urban resilience. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 3:164–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. MacInnis B, Krosnick JA, Abeles A et al (2015) The American public’s preference for preparation for the possible effects of global warming: impact of communication strategies. Clim Chang 128:17–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1286-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Martin-Breen P, Anderies JM (2011) Resilience: a literature review. Bellagio Initiat Futur Philanthr Dev Purs Hum Wellbeing 67. http://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/123456789/3692

  41. Matyas D, Pelling M (2014) Positioning resilience for 2015: the role of resistance, incremental adjustment and transformation in disaster risk management policy. Disasters 39:S1–S18. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. McGreavy B (2016) Resilience as discourse. Environ Commun 10:104–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2015.1014390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. McLellan B, Zhang Q, Farzaneh H et al (2012) Resilience, sustainability and risk management: a focus on energy. Challenges 3:153–182. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe3020153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Meerow S, Newell JP, Stults M (2016) Defining urban resilience : a review. Landsc Urban Plan 147:38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Molyneaux L, Wagner L, Froome C, Foster J (2012) Resilience and electricity systems: a comparative analysis. Energy Policy 47:188–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Moser, SC (2014) Communicating climate change adaptation: The art and science of public engagement when climate change comes home. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change 5: 337-358. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.276

  47. Moser SC (2017) Communicating climate change adaptation and resilience. In: Nisbet M (ed) Oxford research encyclopedia, climate science. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  48. Olsson L, Jerneck A, Thoren H et al (2015) Why resilience is unappealing to social science: theoretical and empirical investigations of the scientific use of resilience. Sci Adv 1:e1400217–e1400217. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1400217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Panter-Brick C (2014) Health, risk, and resilience: interdisciplinary concepts and applications. Annu Rev Anthropol 43:431–448. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-025944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Perz SG, Muñoz-Carpena R, Kiker G, Holt RD (2013) Evaluating ecological resilience with global sensitivity and uncertainty analysis. Ecol Model 263:174–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.04.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Pizzo B (2015) Problematizing resilience: implications for planning theory and practice. Cities 43:133–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2014.11.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Quinlan AE, Berbs-Blzquez M, Haider LJ et al (2016) Measuring and assessing resilience: broadening understanding through multiple disciplinary perspectives. J Appl Ecol 53:677–687. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Reid R, Botterill LC (2013) The multiple meanings of “resilience”: an overview of the literature. Aust J Public Adm 72:31–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Righi AW, Saurin TA, Wachs P (2015) A systematic literature review of resilience engineering: research areas and a research agenda proposal. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 141:142–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Rogers CDF, Bouch CJ, Williams S et al (2012) Resistance and resilience—paradigms for critical local infrastructure. Proc Inst Civ Eng - Munic Eng 165:73–83. https://doi.org/10.1680/muen.11.00030

    Google Scholar 

  56. Romero-Lankao P, Dodman D (2011) Cities in transition: transforming urban centers from hotbeds of GHG emissions and vulnerability to seedbeds of sustainability and resilience. Introduction and editorial overview. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 3:113–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2011.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Ross H, Berkes F (2014) Research approaches for understanding, enhancing, and monitoring community resilience. Soc Nat Resour 27:787–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2014.905668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Sasaki T, Furukawa T, Iwasaki Y et al (2015) Perspectives for ecosystem management based on ecosystem resilience and ecological thresholds against multiple and stochastic disturbances. Ecol Indic 57:395–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.05.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Sharma D, Singh R, Singh R (2014) Building urban climate resilience: learning from the ACCCRN experience in India. Int J Urban Sustain Dev 6:133–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2014.937720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Smith-Osborne A, Whitehill Bolton K (2013) Assessing resilience: a review of measures across the life course. J Evid Based Soc Work 10:111–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/15433714.2011.597305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Standish RJ, Hobbs RJ, Mayfield MM et al (2014) Resilience in ecology: abstraction, distraction, or where the action is? Biol Conserv 177:43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.06.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Stone-Jovicich S (2015) Probing the interfaces between the social sciences and social-ecological resilience: insights from integrative and hybrid perspectives in the social sciences. Ecol Soc 20:23. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-07347-200225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Tendall DM, Joerin J, Kopainsky B et al (2015) Food system resilience: defining the concept. Glob Food Sec 6:17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2015.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Thorén H, Olsson L (2018) Is resilience a normative concept? Resilience 6(2):112–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693293.2017.1406842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Tyler S, Moench M (2012) A framework for urban climate resilience. Clim Dev 4:311–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2012.745389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Weichselgartner J, Kelman I (2015) Geographies of resilience: challenges and opportunities of a descriptive concept. Prog Hum Geogr 39:249–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132513518834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Wilkinson C (2012) Social-ecological resilience: insights and issues for planning theory. Plan Theory 11:148–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095211426274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Wilson GA (2014) Community resilience: path dependency, lock-in effects and transitional ruptures. J Environ Plan Manag 57:1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2012.741519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Wu G, Feder A, Cohen H et al (2013) Understanding resilience. Front Behav Neurosci 7:1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00010

    Google Scholar 

  70. Xu L, Marinova D, Guo X (2015) Resilience thinking: a renewed system approach for sustainability science. Sustain Sci 10:123–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-014-0274-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Zell C, Hubbart JA (2013) Interdisciplinary linkages of biophysical processes and resilience theory: pursuing predictability. Ecol Model 248:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.09.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susanne Moser.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moser, S., Meerow, S., Arnott, J. et al. The turbulent world of resilience: interpretations and themes for transdisciplinary dialogue. Climatic Change 153, 21–40 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2358-0

Download citation