Coastal homeowners in a changing climate


As climate changes, coastal homeowners are potentially crucial actors in reducing the risks to property and human life from rising seas and increased hurricane activity. Absent strict, enforceable regulations mandating retrofitting of existing homes or major changes in homeowner insurance requirements, coastal resilience in a changing climate will largely reflect private, voluntary decisions of millions of individuals. However, research is scarce on the extent of structural vulnerabilities among US coastal homes and the mitigation measures that homeowners are taking or plan to take. Research devoted to disaster preparedness routinely neglects the specific actions of homeowners as consumers of structural mitigation products, despite the fact that such mitigation is the most cost-effective means to reduce losses. We attempt to fill this important gap with a new Coastal Homeowner Survey and indices designed to measure structural vulnerabilities and homeowner actions and intentions to address vulnerabilities. We conducted a pilot study of 662 respondents in one of the most frequently exposed US coastal communities, New Hanover County, North Carolina. We find that, on average, homes are minimally protected, with homeowners taking few actions to address structural vulnerabilities and not considering taking further action. We also find that the perceived cost of mitigation cannot sufficiently explain the lack of action, implying that other factors are at play. Subsequent research will use the remaining pilot survey data to analyze correlates of these indices to inform private and public sector stakeholders on how to incentivize risk reduction through structural mitigations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2


  1. AAPOR (2015) Standard definitions: final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. American Association for Public Opinion Research. Accessed 21 July 2018

  2. Allison M (2017) Are coastal areas ready for rising seas? Zillow, 18 October,

  3. Beatley T (2009) Planning for coastal resilience: best practices for calamitous times. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bichard E, Kazmierczak A (2012) Are homeowners willing to adapt to and mitigate the effects of climate change? Clim Chang 112:633–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bin O, Kruse JB (2006) Real estate market response to coastal flood hazards. Nat Hazards Rev 7(4):137–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bin O, Crawford TW, Kruse JB, Landry CE (2008) Viewscapes and flood hazard: coastal housing market response to amenities and risk. Land Econ 84(3):434–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brenkert-Smith H, Champ PA, Flores N (2006) Insights into wildfire mitigation decisions among wildland-urban interface residents. Soc Nat Resour 19:759–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Craig RK (2018) Coastal adaptation, government subsidized insurance, and perverse incentives to stay. Clim Change.

  9. DeWitt D (2015) The state that ‘outlawed climate change’ accepts latest sea-level rise report. WUNC 91.5 North Carolina Public Radio 4 May

  10. Domonoske C (2017) Trump rolls back Obama-era flood standards for infrastructure projects. NPR 16 August,

  11. FEMA (2000) Coastal construction manual: principles and practices of planning, siting, designing, constructing, and maintaining residential buildings in coastal areas. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  12. FEMA (2006) CRS credit for management of coastal erosion hazards, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Flood Publications NFIP/CRS, Indianapolis

  13. FEMA (2010) Home builder’s guide to coastal construction technical fact sheet series. Rep. No. FEMA P-499, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington

  14. FEMA (2014a) Hazard mitigation assistance (HMA) guidance on property acquisition and relocation for the purpose of open space. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  15. FEMA (2014b) Preparedness in America: research insights to increase individual, organizational, and community action. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ge Y, Peacock WG, Lindell MK (2011) Florida households’ expected responses to hurricane hazard mitigation incentives. Risk Anal 31(10):1676–1691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Herweijer C, Ranger N, Ward RET (2009) Adaptation to climate change: threats and opportunities for the insurance industry. Geneva Pap 34:360–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. IBHS (2008) Fortified for safer living: builders guide. Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety. Accessed 21 July 2018

  19. IBHS (2012) Fortified home hurricane standards. Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety. Accessed 21 July 2018

  20. IBHS (2015a) Rating the states: 2015: An assessment of residential building code and enforcement systems for life safety and property protection in hurricane-prone regions. Atlantic and Gulf Coast States. Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety. March

  21. IBHS (2015b) Wilmington, NC FORTIFIED discount sheet. Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety. Accessed 21 July 2018

  22. IBHS (2016) Regulatory framework for FORTIFIED insurance incentives. Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety. Accessed 21 July 2018

  23. IBHS (2018) Rating the states: 2018: an assessment of residential building code and enforcement systems for life safety and property protection in hurricane-prone regions. Atlantic and Gulf Coast States. Insurance Institute for Business and Home Safety. March

  24. Insurance Information Institute (2018) Facts + Statistics: U.S. catastrophes. Accessed 18 July 2018

  25. IPCC (2014) Summary for policymakers. In: Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part a: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Field CB et al, eds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–32

  26. Lindell MK, Hwang SN (2008) Households’ perceived personal risk and responses in a multihazard environment. Risk Anal 28(2):539–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lindell MK, Perry RW (2000) Household adjustment to earthquake hazard: a review of research. Environ Behav 32(4):461–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Löw P (2018) Hurricanes cause record losses in 2017 - the year in figures, Munich Re, April 1.

  29. Meldrum JR, Champ PA, Arziniack T, Renkert-Smith H, Barth CM, Falk LC (2014) Cost shared wildfire risk mitigation in Log Hill Mesa, Colorado: survey evidence on participation and willingness to pay. Int J Wildland Fire 23(4):567–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Montz BE, Tobin GA, Hagelman RR III (2017) Natural hazards: explanation and integration, 2nd edn. Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  31. NHC. U.S. mainland hurricane strikes by state, 1851-2004. National Hurricane Center. (January 29, 2016)

  32. NIBS (2015) Developing pre-disaster resilience based on public and private incentivization. National Institute of Building Sciences, Multihazard Mitigation Council in conjunction with the Council on Finance, Insurance and Real Estate. October 29

  33. NIBS (2017) Natural hazard mitigation saves: 2017 interim report. National Institute of Building Sciences, Multihazard Mitigation Council. December

  34. NRC (2010) Adapting to the impacts of climate change. National Research Council. The National Academies Press, Washington

  35. NHERI (2017) Five-year science plan: multi-hazard research to make a more resilient world. Natural Hazards Engineering Research Infrastructure. National Science Foundation. July

  36. NOAA (2013) National coastal population report: population trends from 1970 to 2020. NOAA’s State of the Coast. March.

  37. Peacock WG (2003) Hurricane mitigation status and factors influencing mitigation status among Florida’s single-family homeowners. Nat Hazards Rev 4(3):149–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Peacock WG, Brody SD, Highfield W (2005) Hurricane risk perceptions among Florida’s single family homeowners. Landsc Urban Plan 73(2):120–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Pielke RA Jr, Gratz J, Landsea CW, Collins D, Saunders MA, Musulin R (2008) Normalized hurricane damage in the United States: 1900–2005. Nat Hazards Rev February: 29–42

  40. Sanders RA (2010) Separating fact from fiction: insurance claims and building envelope failure. J Archit Tech 27(2)

  41. Smith AB, Matthews JL (2015) Quantifying uncertainty and variable sensitivity within the US billion-dollar weather and climate disaster cost estimates. Nat Hazards 1–23

  42. Spanger-Siegfried E, Fitzpatrick M, Dahl K. (2014) Encroaching tides: how sea level rise and tidal flooding threaten U.S. east and gulf coast communities over the next 30 years. Union of Concerned Scientists, October, Cambridge

  43. Sweet WV, Dusek G, Obeysekera J, Marra JJ (2018) Patterns and projections of high tide flooding along the U.S. coastline using a common impact threshold. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Technical Report NOS CO-OPS 086.February

  44. Taylor AL, Dessai S, Bruine de Bruin W (2014) Public perception of climate risk and adaptation in the UK: a review of the literature. Clim Risk Manag 4-5:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. US Census Bureau. Historical census of housing tables. (January 29, 2016a)

  46. US Census Bureau. State & county quick facts. (January 29, 2016b)

  47. Vickery PJ, Skerlj PF, Lin J, Twisdale LA Jr, Young MA, Lavelle FM (2006) HAZUS-MH hurricane model methodology. II: damage and loss estimation. Nat Hazards Rev 7:94–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Walsh KJE, McBride JL, Klotzbach PJ, Balachandran S, Camargo SJ, Holland G, Knutson TR, Kossin JP, Lee T, Sobel A, Sugi M (2016) Tropical cyclones and climate change. WIREs Clim Change 7(1):65–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of Notre Dame’s Environmental Change Initiative (ECI) and its Global Adaptation Index (ND-GAIN) for the pilot of the Coastal Homeowner Survey in North Carolina. The authors recognize the ongoing collaboration with the Insurance Institute for Business and Home Safety and with their partnering survey research firm, SSRS. The first author recognizes the support of the Andrew W. Mellon New Directions Fellowship for training in ecology and environmental law. The authors also thank discussants/participants at the Adapting to Climate Change Workshop at the University of Notre Dame, as well as the reviewers of this manuscript, for their feedback on this work.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debra Javeline.

Additional information

This article is part of a Special Issue on “Adapting to Water Impacts of Climate Change” edited by Debra Javeline, Nives Dolšak, and Aseem Prakash.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Javeline, D., Kijewski-Correa, T. Coastal homeowners in a changing climate. Climatic Change 152, 259–274 (2019).

Download citation