Abstract
How climate-sensitive actors—like commercial farmers—perceive, understand, and react to weather and climate stimuli will ultimately determine the success or failure of climate change adaptation policies. Many studies have characterized farmers’ climate risk perceptions or farming practices, but few have evaluated the in situ decision-making processes that link (or fail to link) risk perceptions to adaptive behaviors. Here, we use a novel methodology to reveal patterns in climate-sensitive decision-making by commercial grain farmers in South Africa. We structure, linguistically code, and statistically analyze causal relationships described in 30 mental models interviews. We show that farmers’ framing of weather and climate risks strongly predicts their adoption of conservation agriculture (CA)—climate-resilient best practices that reduce shorter-term financial and weather risks and longer-term agronomic risks. These farmers describe weather and climate risks using six exhaustive and mutually exclusive languages: agricultural, cognitive, economic, emotional, political, and survival. The prevalence of agricultural and economic language only weakly predicts CA practice, whereas emotional and farm survival language strongly limits CA adoption. The framing of weather risks in terms of farm survival impedes adaptations that are likely to improve such survival in the longer term. But this survival framing is not necessarily indicative of farmers’ current economic circumstances. It represents a consequential mindset rather than a financial state and it may go undetected in more conventional studies relying on direct survey or interview questions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adger WN, Dessai S, Goulden M et al (2009) Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Clim Chang 93:335–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9520-z
Antón J, Kimura S, Lankoski J, Cattaneo A (2012) A comparative study of risk management in agriculture under climate change. OECD, Paris
Barnett J, O’Neill S (2010) Maladaptation. Glob Environ Chang 20:211–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.11.004
Bassett TJ, Fogelman C (2013) Déjà vu or something new? The adaptation concept in the climate change literature. Geoforum 48:42–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.04.010
Bernstein H (2012) Commercial agriculture in South Africa since 1994: “natural, simply capitalism”. J Agrar Chang 13:23–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12011
Bolliger A, Magid J, Amado JCT et al (2006) Taking stock of the Brazilian “zero-till revolution”: a review of landmark research and farmers' practice. Adv Agron 91:47–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(06)91002-5
Burton RJF (2004) Seeing through the ‘good farmer’s’ eyes: towards developing an understanding of the social symbolic value of ‘productivist’ behaviour. Sociol Rural 44:195–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2004.00270.x
Clayton S, Devine-Wright P, Stern PC et al (2015) Psychological research and global climate change. Nat Clim Chang 5:640–646. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2622
Davidson D (2016) Gaps in agricultural climate adaptation research. Nat Clim Chang 6:433–435. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3007
Derpsch R, Franzluebbers AJ, Duiker SW et al (2014) Why do we need to standardize no-tillage research? Soil Tillage Res 137:16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2013.10.002
Devarenne N (2009) Nationalism and the farm novel in South Africa, 1883–2004. J South Afr Stud 35:627–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057070903101854
Douxchamps S, Van Wijk MT, Silvestri S et al (2016) Linking agricultural adaptation strategies, food security and vulnerability: evidence from West Africa. Reg Environ Chang 16:1305–1317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0838-6
Eakin H, Tucker CM, Castellanos E et al (2014) Adaptation in a multi-stressor environment: perceptions and responses to climatic and economic risks by coffee growers in Mesoamerica. Environ Dev Sustain 16:123–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-013-9466-9
Eakin H, York A, Aggarwal R et al (2016) Cognitive and institutional influences on farmers’ adaptive capacity: insights into barriers and opportunities for transformative change in Central Arizona. Reg Environ Chang 16:801–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0789-y
Farmar-Bowers Q, Lane R (2009) Understanding farmers' strategic decision-making processes and the implications for biodiversity conservation policy. J Environ Manag 90:1135–1144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.05.002
Findlater KM, Donner SD, Satterfield T, Kandlikar M (2018) Integration anxiety: the cognitive isolation of climate change. Glob Environ Chang 50:178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.02.010
Giller KE, Andersson JA, Corbeels M et al (2015) Beyond conservation agriculture. Front Plant Sci 6:1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00870
Girvan M, Newman MEJ (2002) Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:7821–7826. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.122653799
Goffman E (1974) Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. Harper Colophon, New York
Hobbs PR, Sayre K, Gupta R (2008) The role of conservation agriculture in sustainable agriculture. Philos Trans R Soc B 363:543–555. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2169
Jones N, Ross H, Lynam T et al (2011) Mental models: an interdisciplinary synthesis of theory and methods. E&S 16:46. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03802-160146
Kirkegaard JA, Conyers MK, Hunt JR et al (2014) Sense and nonsense in conservation agriculture: principles, pragmatism and productivity in Australian mixed farming systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 187:133–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.08.011
Knowler D, Bradshaw B (2007) Farmers’ adoption of conservation agriculture: a review and synthesis of recent research. Food Policy 32:25–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.01.003
Kunreuther H, Heal G, Allen M et al (2013) Risk management and climate change. Nat Clim Chang 3:447–450. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1740
Levine J, Chan KMA, Satterfield T (2015) From rational actor to efficient complexity manager: exorcising the ghost of Homo economicus with a unified synthesis of cognition research. Ecol Econ 114:22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.010
Lichtenstein S, Slovic P (2006) The construction of preference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Morgan MG, Fischhoff B, Bostrom A, Atman CJ (2002) Risk communication: a mental models approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Moschini G, Hennessy DA (2001) Uncertainty, risk aversion, and risk management for agricultural producers. In: Gardner B, Rausser G (eds) Handbook of agricultural economics, pp 87–153
New M, Liverman D, Schroder H, Anderson K (2011) Four degrees and beyond: the potential for a global temperature increase of four degrees and its implications. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 369:6–19. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0303
Niang I, Ruppel OC, Abdrabo MA et al (2014) Africa. In: Barros VR, Field CB, Dokken DJ et al (eds) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part B: regional aspects. Contribution of working group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge, U.K.
Niles MT, Lubell M, Brown M (2015) How limiting factors drive agricultural adaptation to climate change. Agric Ecosyst Environ 200:178–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.11.010
Orlove B (2005) Human adaptation to climate change: a review of three historical cases and some general perspectives. Environ Sci Pol 8:589–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2005.06.009
Pannell DJ, Marshall GR, Barr N et al (2006) Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders. Aust J Exp Agric 46:1407–1424. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA05037
Pidgeon N, Fischhoff B (2011) The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks. Nat Clim Chang 1:35–41. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1080
Pittelkow CM, Liang X, Linquist BA et al (2015) Productivity limits and potentials of the principles of conservation agriculture. Nature 517:365–368. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13809
Porter KE, Hulme M (2013) The emergence of the geoengineering debate in the UK print media: a frame analysis. Geogr J 179:342–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12003
Prokopy LS, Floress K, Klotthor-Weinkauf D, Baumgart-Getz A (2008) Determinants of agricultural best management practice adoption: evidence from the literature. J Soil Water Conserv 63:300–311. https://doi.org/10.2489/63.5.300
Prokopy LS, Arbuckle JG, Barnes AP et al (2015) Farmers and climate change: a cross-national comparison of beliefs and risk perceptions in high-income countries. Environ Manag 56:492–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0504-2
Risbey J, Kandlikar M, Dowlatabadi H, Graetz D (1999) Scale, context, and decision making in agricultural adaptation to climate variability and change. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 4:137–165. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009636607038
RSA (2013a) Long-term adaptation scenarios flagship research Programme (LTAS) for South Africa. Climate change implications for agriculture and forestry sectors in South Africa. Republic of South Africa, Department of Environmental Affairs
RSA (2013b) Abstract of agricultural statistics. Republic of South Africa, Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Pretoria, p 2013
Rusinamhodzi L, Corbeels M, Van Wijk MT et al (2011) A meta-analysis of long-term effects of conservation agriculture on maize grain yield under rain-fed conditions. Agron Sustain Dev 31:657–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-011-0040-2
Seo SN, Mendelsohn R (2008) Measuring impacts and adaptations to climate change: a structural Ricardian model of African livestock management. Agric Econ 38:151–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2008.00289.x
Thaler RH (2000) From Homo economicus to Homo sapiens. J Econ Perspect 14:133–141. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.1.133
Tschakert P (2007) Views from the vulnerable: understanding climatic and other stressors in the Sahel. Glob Environ Chang 17:381–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.11.008
Van den Putte A, Govers G, Diels J et al (2010) Assessing the effect of soil tillage on crop growth: a meta-regression analysis on European crop yields under conservation agriculture. Eur J Agron 33:231–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2010.05.008
Acknowledgements
The authors thank their participants for their time and attention; Mark New and the African Climate & Development Initiative at the University of Cape Town for logistical support; Peter Johnston, Johann Strauss, and Francis Steyn for their guidance; Jannie Bruwer, Pieter Burger, Louis Coetzee, Pierre Laubscher, Daniel Badenhorst, and Elena Hough for their help in recruiting willing participants; Eric Leinberger for the map; and Lucy Rodina for her research assistance.
Funding
This work was funded by the International Development Research Centre (#106204-99906075-058), the Centre for International Governance Innovation, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Insight Grant #435-2013-2017), the University of British Columbia, and IODE Canada.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
K.M.F. designed the study, collected and analyzed the data, and wrote the paper. T.S., M.K., and S.D.D. supervised the design and analysis and edited the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 2796 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Findlater, K.M., Satterfield, T., Kandlikar, M. et al. Six languages for a risky climate: how farmers react to weather and climate change. Climatic Change 148, 451–465 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2217-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2217-z