Climate security assessment of countries
Climate change has repercussions on national security. Yet, no widely accepted definition of climate security exists to date. In this paper, we present a mathematical model that defines and assesses climate security as a function of 37 indicators of exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity. The model combines the indicators using statistical methods and fuzzy logic which encapsulates the subjective part of the assessment, to derive an overall climate security score from 0 to 1, and then rank 187 countries. A sensitivity analysis points to those indicators with the highest potential to improve climate security and indicates regional priorities for action. It turns out that globally the highest priorities are the economy which is necessary for climate adaptation, population growth which should be contained, political rights, renewable energy use, and sea level rise. Although several results such as the high ranks of Scandinavian countries are intuitive, the model uncovers unexpected facts such as the higher rank of Uruguay than Denmark and Japan or the higher rank of Costa Rica than Italy. However, a closer look at the intermediate results reveals that Uruguay and Costa Rica are far superior to Denmark, Japan, and Italy in the areas of water and energy.
We thank the Emergency Events Database research team (EM-DAT) of the Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters of Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium, for providing data on natural disasters (www.emdat.be).
Y.A.P. designed the research and developed the methodology; N.C., E.G. and F.D.K developed the components of the model and found the data sets; V.S.K. wrote the algorithms and ran the model; all authors analyzed the results and wrote the paper.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Adger WN, Pulhin JM, Barnett J, Dabelko GD, Hovelsrud GK, Levy M, Spring ÚO, Vogel CH (2014) Human security. In: Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ et al (eds) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part a: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University press, Cambridge, pp 755–791Google Scholar
- Beccari Β (2016) A comparative analysis of disaster risk, vulnerability and resilience composite indicator. PLOS Curr Disasters. https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.dis.453df025e34b682e9737f95070f9b970
- Brown LR (1977) Redefining national security (Vol. 14). Worldwatch Institute, Washington, DC. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED147229.pdf. Accessed 21 July 2017
- Busby JW (2007) Climate change and national security: an agenda for action. Council on Foreign Relations Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Chen C, Noble I, Hellmann J, Coffee J, Murillo M, Chawla N (2015) University of Notre Dame Global Adaptation Index: Country index technical report. http://index.nd-gain.org:8080/documents/nd-gain_technical_document_2015.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2017
- Füssel H-M (2010) Development and climate change: review and quantitative analysis of indices of climate change exposure, adaptive capacity, sensitivity, and impacts. World development report background papers. World Bank, Washington, DC. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/885101468164982209. Accessed 21 July 2017
- IPCC (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New YorkGoogle Scholar
- IPCC (2014a) Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- IPCC (2014b) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part B: Regional aspects. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Thow A, de Blois M (2008) Climate change and human vulnerability: mapping emerging trends and risk hotspots for humanitarian actors. Report to the UN Office for coordination of humanitarian affairs, Maplecroft/OCHA/CARE, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change) (2016) Decisions adopted by the conference of the parties: decision 1/CP.21. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/10a01.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2017