The Dutch adaptation web portal: seven lessons learnt from a co-production point of view

  • Rahel LaudienEmail author
  • Eva Boon
  • Hasse Goosen
  • Kim van Nieuwaal


Since its release in 2014, the Knowledge Portal for Spatial Adaptation has evolved into the central web portal for climate adaptation in the Netherlands, supporting regional and local adaptation efforts. This paper reflects on how co-production shaped the development of the portal and evaluates its use and the usability of the most frequently accessed tool, the ‘Climate Adaptation Atlas’. Analysis of evaluation reports and web-statistics revealed a substantial, diverse and regularly returning group of visitors to the portal. For example, municipalities use the atlas to understand how their municipality can be impacted by climate change to support spatial planning. Using the usability criteria of fit, interplay and interaction, the analysis showed that the atlas fits the needs of creating awareness and integrating climate information with other spatial information. However, the interplay of new climate information with other currently used information varies amongst municipalities. Interactions between scientists and users were found at different stages involving different actors. Based on the development and use of the portal, seven lessons have been derived emphasising the importance of a continuous co-production process with users; a modular setup to acknowledge the diversity in approaches; encouraging users by providing showcases of adaptation initiatives and enabling exchange of information amongst users; the need for political support; the ability and will to act even in case of uncertainty; flexibility in project design to incorporate changes in user needs and the beneficial role of boundary organisations in improving mutual understanding. Through this paper, contributions to the understanding of how adaptation web portals can be developed and improved are made.


  1. Armitage DR, Plummer R, Berkes F et al (2009) Adaptive co-management for social-ecological complexity. Front Ecol Environ 7:95–102. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beier P, Hansen LJ, Helbrecht L, Behar D (2017) A how-to guide for coproduction of actionable science. Conserv Lett 10:288–296. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. van den Berg M, Coenen F (2012) Integrating climate change adaptation into Dutch local policies and the role of contextual factors. Local Environ 17:441–460. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Briley L, Brown D, Kalafatis SE (2015) Overcoming barriers during the co-production of climate information for decision-making. Clim Risk Manag 9:41–49. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. van der Brugge R, Ellen GJ, Eshuis J (2015) Resultaten van de Monitor Ruimtelijke Adaptatie. Accessed 8 May 2017
  6. van Buuren A, Edelenbos J (2004) Why is joint knowledge production such a problem? Sci Public Policy 31:289–299. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cash DW, Clark WC, Alcock F et al (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:8086–8091. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cash DW, Borck JC, Patt AG (2006) Countering the loading-dock approach to linking science and decision making: comparative analysis of El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) forecasting systems. Sci Technol Hum Values 31:465–494. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cutter SL (2003) The vulnerability of science and the science of vulnerability. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 93:1–12. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dilling L, Lemos MC (2011) Creating usable science: opportunities and constraints for climate knowledge use and their implications for science policy. Glob Environ Chang 21:680–689. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Enserink B, Kwakkel JH, Veenman S (2013) Coping with uncertainty in climate policy making: (mis)understanding scenario studies. Futures 53:1–12. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. van Enst WI, Driessen PPJ, Runhaar HAC (2014) Towards productive science-policy interfaces: a research agenda. J Environ Assess Policy Manag 16. doi:
  13. Goosen H, de Groot-Reichwein MAM, Masselink L et al (2014) Climate Adaptation Services for the Netherlands: an operational approach to support spatial adaptation planning. Reg Environ Chang 14:1035–1048. Google Scholar
  14. de Graaff R (2017) Tussentijdse Evaluatie Ruimtelijke Adaptatie—Reflecteren en Inspireren. Accessed 6 May 2017
  15. Hegger D, Dieperink C (2014) Toward successful joint knowledge production for climate change adaptation: lessons from six regional projects in the Netherlands. Ecol Soc 19. doi:
  16. Hoppe T, van der Vegt A, Stegmaier P (2016) Presenting a framework to analyze local climate policy and action in small and medium-sized cities. Sustain 8:1–41. Google Scholar
  17. Lemos MC, Morehouse BJ (2005) The co-production of science and policy in integrated climate assessments. Glob Environ Chang 15:57–68. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lemos MC, Kirchhoff CJ, Ramprasad V (2012) Narrowing the climate information usability gap. Nat Clim Chang 2:789–794. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lövbrand E (2011) Co-producing European climate science and policy: a cautionary note on the making of useful knowledge. Sci Public Policy 38:225–236. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Masselink L, Goosen H, Grond V et al (2017) Climate change in cities: an atelier approach for municipal action. Solutions 8:54–65Google Scholar
  21. McNie EC (2007) Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature. Environ Sci Pol 10:17–38. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McNie EC (2013) Delivering climate services: organizational strategies and approaches for producing useful climate-science information. Weather Clim Soc 5:14–26. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Meadow AM, Ferguson DB, Guido Z et al (2015) Moving toward the deliberate co-production of climate science knowledge. Weather Clim Soc 7:179–191. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mees HLP, Dijk J, van Soest D, et al (2014) A method for the deliberate and deliberative selection of policy instrument mixes for climate change adaptation. Ecol Soc 19. doi:
  25. Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment, Ministry of Economic Affairs (2018) Deltaprogramma 2018 - Doorwerken aan een duurzame en veilige delta. Accessed 29 Oct 2017
  26. Moser SC, Luers AL (2008) Managing climate risks in California: the need to engage resource managers for successful adaptation to change. Clim Chang 87:309–322. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Räsänen A, Jurgilevich A, Haanpää S et al (2017) The need for non-climate services—empirical evidence from Finnish municipalities. Clim Risk Manag 16:29–42. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Runhaar H, van Nieuwaal K (2010) Understanding the use of science in decision-making on cockle fisheries and gas mining in the Dutch Wadden Sea: putting the science-policy interface in a wider perspective. Environ Sci Pol 13:239–248. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sanderson H, Hilden M, Russel D, Dessai S (2016) Database support for adaptation to climate change: an assessment of web-based portals across scales. Integr Environ Assess Manag 12:627–631. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Street R (2016) Towards a leading role on climate services in Europe: a research and innovation roadmap. Clim Serv 1:2–5. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Street R, Karali E, Mattern K, et al (2015) Overview of climate change adaptation platforms in Europe. Accessed 5 May 2017
  32. Swart R, Sedee AGJ, De Pater F et al (2013) Climate-proofing spatial planning and water management projects: an analysis of 100 local and regional projects in the Netherlands. J Environ Policy Plan 16:55–74. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Swart RJ, de Bruin K, Dhenain S et al (2017) Developing climate information portals with users: promises and pitfalls. Clim Serv 6:12–22. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Veraart JA, van Nieuwaal K, Driessen PPJ, Kabat P (2014) From climate research to climate compatible development: experiences and progress in the Netherlands. Reg Environ Chang 14:851–863. Google Scholar
  35. Wardekker JA, van der Sluijs JP, Janssen PHM et al (2008) Uncertainty communication in environmental assessments: views from the Dutch science-policy interface. Environ Sci Pol 11:627–641. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Willows R, Connell R (2003) Climate adaptation: risk, uncertainty and decision-making. UKCIP Technical Report. Accessed 5 May 2017
  37. Wilson E (2006) Adapting to climate change at the local level: the spatial planning response. Local Environ 11:609–625. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Climate Adaptation ServicesBussumthe Netherlands
  2. 2.University of UtrechtUtrechtthe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations