Advertisement

Climatic Change

, Volume 148, Issue 1–2, pp 205–218 | Cite as

The 2010 Pakistan floods in a future climate

  • G. van der Schrier
  • L. M. Rasmijn
  • J. Barkmeijer
  • A. Sterl
  • W. Hazeleger
Article

Abstract

The summer 2010 floods hitting Pakistan were the severest on record. Coinciding with these events was the 2010 heatwave over eastern Europe and Russia, which also ranks among the severest ever recorded in the region. Both events were related to an anomalously widespread and intense quasi-stationary anticyclonic circulation anomaly over western Russia which provided favourable conditions, in combination with monsoonal forcing factors, for the Pakistan precipitation events. Here, a data assimilation technique is used which results in a climate model simulation which has its mean upper atmospheric circulation shifted in the direction of the anomalous anticyclonic circulation of summer 2010. This primes the climate model to reproduce, much more frequently than in a climate simulation without this technique, to simulate the conditions which led to the Pakistan 2010 floodings. These experiments are conducted under both present-day and future climatic conditions. In the present-day climate, the main features of the 2010 Pakistan precipitation events are modeled realistically, although the amplitude of the extreme precipitation is underestimated. The simulated future equivalent of the observed extreme precipitation events shows a stronger precipitation over the Bay of Bengal to Kashmir in northern India and northern Pakistan, and from the Arabian Sea to northern Pakistan. In the model context, these precipitation increases are substantial with 50–100% increases in rainfall rates. This implies that the future equivalent of the 2010 Pakistan floodings may have even stronger socio-economic impacts.

Notes

Funding information

The research leading to these results has been funded by the Dutch national research programme “Knowledge for Climate” and the EU FP7 Collaborative Project UERRA, Grant agreement 607193.

Supplementary material

10584_2018_2173_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (485 kb)
(PDF 484 KB)

References

  1. Akram Anjum M (2010) Super flood 2010. Meteorological analysis of the Pakistan meteorological department, Internal documentGoogle Scholar
  2. Balsamo G, Viterbo P, Beljaars A, van den Hurk B, Hirschi M, Betts AK, Scipal K (2009) A revised hydrology for the ECMWF model: verification from field site to terrestrial water storage and impact in the integrated forecast system. J Hydrometeor 10:623.  https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JHM1068.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barkmeijer J, Iversen T, Palmer TN (2003) Forcing singular vectors and other sensitive model structures. Quart J R Met Soc 129:2401–2423.  https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.02.126 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Christensen J, Krishna Kumar K, Aldrian E, An SI, Cavalcanti I, de Castro M, Dong W, Goswami P, Hall A, Kanyanga J, Kitoh A, Kossin J, Lau NC, Renwick J, Stephenson DS-PX, Zhou T (2013) Climate phenomena and their relevance for future regional climate change. In: Stocker T, Qin D, Plattner GK, Tignor M, Allen S, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Midgley BVP (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the 5th assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Dee DP, Uppala SM, Simmons AJ, Berrisford P, Poli P, Kobayashi S, Andrae U, Balmaseda MA, Balsamo G, Bauer P, Bechtold P, Beljaars ACM, van de Berg L, Bidlot J, Bormann N, Delsol C, Dragani R, Fuentes M, Geer AJ, Haimberger L, Healy SB, Hersbach H, Hólm EV, Isaksen L, Kallberg P, Köhler M, Matricardi M, McNally AP, Monge-Sanz BM, Morcrette JJ, Park BK, Peubey C, de Rosnay P, Tavolato C, Thépaut JN, Vitart F (2011) The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Quart J R Met Soc 137:553–597.  https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dickson RR (1984) Eurasian snow cover versus Indian monsoon rainfall—an extension of the Hahn-Shukla results. J Clim Appl Meteorol 23:171–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fichefet T, Maqueda MAM (1997) Sensitivity of a global sea ice model to the treatment of ice thermodynamics and dynamics. J Geophys Res (Oceans) 102:12,609.  https://doi.org/10.1029/97JC00480 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Galarneau TJ Jr, Hamill TM, Dole RM, Perlwitz J (2012) A multiscale analysis of the extreme weather events over western Russia and Northern Pakistan during July 2010. Mon Wea Rev 140:1639–1664.  https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00191.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Halder S, Dirmeyer P (2017) Relation of Eurasian snow cover and Indian summer monsoon rainfall: importance of the delayed hydrological effect. J Climate 30:1273–1289.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0033.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harris I, Jones PD, Osborn TJ, Lister DH (2013) Updated high-resolution grids of monthly climatic observations—the CRU TS 3.10 Dataset. Int. J. Climatol.  https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3711
  11. Hazeleger W, Severijns C, Semmler T, Stefanescu S, Yang S, Wang X, Wyser K, Dutra E, Baldasano JM, Bintanja R, Bougeault P, Caballero R, Ekman A, Christensen JH, van den Hurk B, Jimenes P, Jones C, Kallberg P, Koenigk T, McGrath R, Miranda P, van Noije T, Palmer T, Parodi JA, Schmith T, Selten F, Storelvmo T, Sterl A, Tapamo H, Vancoppenolle M, Viterbo P, Willén U (2010) EC-earth: a seamless earth-system prediction approach in action. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 91:1357–1363.  https://doi.org/10.1175/2010BAMS2877.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hazeleger W, Wang X, Severijns C, Stefanescu S, Bintanja R, Sterl A, Wyser K, Semmler T, Yang S, van den Hurk B, van Noije T, van der Linden E, van der Wiel K (2012) EC-Earth v2.2: description and validation of new seamless Earth prediction model. Climate Dyn 39:2611–2629.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-011-1228-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hong CC, Hsu HH, Lin NH, Chiu H (2011) Roles of European blocking and tropical-extratropical interaction in the 2010 Pakistan flooding. Geophys Res Lett 38:L13,806.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047583 Google Scholar
  14. Houze RA Jr, Rasmussen KL, Medina S, Brodzik SR, Romatschke U (2011) Anomalous atmospheric events leading to the summer 2010 floods in Pakistan. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 92:291–298.  https://doi.org/10.1175/2010BAMS3173.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huffman GJ, Bolvin DT, Nelkin EJ, Wolff DB, Adler RF, Gu G, Hong Y, Bowman KP, Stocker EF (2007) The TRMM multisatellite precipitation analysis (TMPA): quasi-global, multiyear, combined-sensor precipitation estimates at fine scales. J Hydrometeor 8:38–55.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM560.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kumar KK, Patwardhan SK, Kulkarni A, Kamala K, Rao KK, Jones R (2011) Simulated projections for summer monsoon climate over India by a high-resolution regional climate model (PRECIS). Curr Sci 101(3):312–326Google Scholar
  17. Lau WKM, Kim K-M (2012) The 2010 Pakistan flood and Russian heat wave: teleconnection of hydrometeorological extremes. J Hydrometeor 13:392–403.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-11-016.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Madec G (2008) NEMO ocean engine. Note du Pole modelisation. Tech. Rep. sNo 27 ISSN No 1288-1619. Institute Pierre-Simon Laplace (IPSL), FranceGoogle Scholar
  19. Martius O, Sodemann H, Joos H, Pfahl S, Winschall A, Croci-Maspoli M, Graf M, Madonna E, Mueller B, Schemm S, Sedlácek J, Sprenger M, Wernli H (2013) The role of upper-level dynamics and surface processes for the Pakistan flood of July 2010. Quart J R Met Soc 139:1780–1797.  https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2082 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McGregor GR, Nieuwolt S (1998) Tropical climatology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Nie J, Shaevitz DA, Sobel AH (2016) Forcings and feedbacks on convection in the 2010 Pakistan flood: modeling extreme precipitation with interactive large-scale ascent. J Adv Model Earth Syst 8:1055–1072.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2016MS000663 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rasmijn LM, van der Schrier G, Barkmeijer J, Sterl A, Hazeleger W (2015) On the use of the forced sensitivity method in climate studies. Quart J R Met Soc 688:845–853.  https://doi.org/10.1002/qj/2402 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rasmijn LM, van der Schrier G, Barkmeijer J, Sterl A, Hazeleger W (2016) The extreme 2013/2014 winter in a future climate. J Geophys Res (Atmospheres) 121:5680–5698.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023585 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rasmijn LM, van der Schrier G, Bintanja R, Barkmeijer J, Sterl A, Hazeleger W (2018) Future equivalent of 2010 Russian heatwave intensified by weakening soil moisture constraints. Nature Climate Change,  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0114-0
  25. Rayner NA, Brohan P, Parker DE, Folland CK, Kennedy JJ, Vanicek M, Ansell T, Tett SFB (2006) Improved analyses of changes and uncertainties in sea surface temperature measured in situ since the mid-nineteenth century: the HadSST2 data set. J Climate 19:446–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rodewald M (1936) Bemerkungen zu: Karl Wien, Die Wetterverhältnisse am Nanga Parbat während der Katastrophe auf der deutschen Himalaja-Expedition 1934. Meteorol Zeitschr Mai:182–186Google Scholar
  27. Sharmila S, Joseph S, Sahai AK, Abhilash S, Chattopadhyay R (2015) Future projection of Indian summer monsoon variability under climate change scenario: an assessment from CMIP5 climate models. Glob Planet Chang 124:62–78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2014.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sterl A, Bintanja R, Brodeau L, Gleeson E, Koenigk T, Schmith T, Semmler T, Severijns C, Wyser K, Yang S (2012) A look at the ocean in the EC-Earth climate model. Climate Dyn 39:2631–2657.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-011-1239-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Trenberth KE, Fasullo JT (2012) Climate extremes and climate change: the Russian heat wave and other climate extremes of 2010. J Geophys Res (Atmospheres) 117:D17,103.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018020 Google Scholar
  30. Turner AG, Aannamalai H (2012) Climate change and the South Asian summer monsoon. Nat Clim Change 2:587–595.  https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE1495 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Turner AG, Slingo JM (2011) Using idealized snow forcing to test teleconnections with the Indian summer monsoon in the Hadley Centre GCM. Climate Dyn 36:1717–1735.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-010-0805-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. van der Schrier G, Barkmeijer J (2005) Bjerknes’ hypothesis on the coldness during 1790–1820 AD revisited. Climate Dyn 25:537–553.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-005-0053-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. van der Schrier G, Barkmeijer J (2007) North American 1818–1824 drought and 1825–1840 pluvial and their possible relation to the atmospheric circulation. J Geophys Res (Atmospheres) 112:D13,102.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008429 Google Scholar
  34. Wien K (1936) Die Wetterverhältnisse am Nanga Parbat während der Katastrophe auf der deutschen Himalaja-Expedition 1934. Meteorol. Zeitschr. Januar:26–32Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Royal Netherlands Meteorological InstituteDe BiltNetherlands
  2. 2.Wageningen University & ResearchWageningenNetherlands
  3. 3.Netherlands eScience CenterAmsterdamNetherlands

Personalised recommendations