Climatic Change

, Volume 147, Issue 3–4, pp 507–521 | Cite as

Do climate change adaptation practices improve technical efficiency of smallholder farmers? Evidence from Nepal

  • Uttam Khanal
  • Clevo Wilson
  • Boon Lee
  • Viet-Ngu Hoang


This paper provides one of the first empirical studies that examine the impact of climate change adaptation practices on technical efficiency (TE) among smallholder farmers in Nepal. An adaptation index is used to explore the impact of farmers’ adaptation on TE using the stochastic frontier analysis framework. Data for six districts of Nepal representing all three agro-ecological regions (terai, hill, and mountain) were collected from a focus group discussion, a stakeholder workshop and a household survey. The survey shows that about 91% of the farming households have adopted at least one practice to minimize the adverse impacts of climate change. Empirical results reveal that adaptation is an important factor explaining efficiency differentials among farming households. Those adopting a greater number of adaptation practices on a larger scale are, on average, found to be 13% more technically efficient than those adopting fewer practices on smaller scale. The empirical results also show that average TE is only 0.72, indicating that there are opportunities for farming households in Nepal to further improve productive efficiency, on average by 28%. Other important factors that explain variations in the productive efficiency across farming households include farmer’s education level, irrigation facilities, market access, and social capital such as farmer’s participations in relevant agricultural organizations and clubs. This study provides empirical evidence to policy makers that small scale adjustments made by farmers in response to climate change impacts are effective in improving farmers’ efficiency in agriculture production. This indicates a need for farmers’ involvement in climate change adaptation planning.

Supplementary material

10584_2018_2168_MOESM1_ESM.docx (866 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 865 kb)
10584_2018_2168_MOESM2_ESM.docx (16 kb)
ESM 2 (DOCX 16 kb)
10584_2018_2168_MOESM3_ESM.docx (12 kb)
ESM 3 (DOCX 12.4 kb)
10584_2018_2168_MOESM4_ESM.docx (14 kb)
ESM 4 (DOCX 14.4 kb)
10584_2018_2168_MOESM5_ESM.docx (14 kb)
ESM 5 (DOCX 14.2 kb)


  1. Aigner D, Lovell CK, Schmidt P (1977) Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. J Econ 6:21–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akram N (2012) Is climate change hindering economic growth of Asian economies? Asia Pac Dev J 19:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asadullah MN, Rahman S (2009) Farm productivity and efficiency in rural Bangladesh: the role of education revisited. Appl Econ 41:17–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandara JS, Cai Y (2014) The impact of climate change on food crop productivity, food prices and food security in South Asia. J Econ Anal Policy 44:451–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Battese GE, Coelli TJ (1995) A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empir Econ 20:325–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Below TB, Mutabazi KD, Kirschke D, Franke C, Sieber S, Siebert R, Tscherning K (2012) Can farmers’ adaptation to climate change be explained by socio-economic household-level variables? Glob Environ Chang 22:223–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Binam JN, Sylla K, Diarra I, Nyambi G (2003) Factors affecting technical efficiency among coffee farmers in Cote d’Ivoire: evidence from the centre west region. Afr Dev Rev 15:66–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Binam JN, Tonye J, Nyambi G, Akoa M (2004) Factors affecting the technical efficiency among smallholder farmers in the slash and burn agriculture zone of Cameroon. Food Policy 29:531–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen Z, Huffman WE, Rozelle S (2009) Farm technology and technical efficiency: evidence from four regions in China. China Econ Rev 20:153–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chhetri N, Chaudhary P, Tiwari PR, Yadaw RB (2012) Institutional and technological innovation: understanding agricultural adaptation to climate change in Nepal. Appl Geogr 33:142–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coelli T (1996) A guide to FRONTIER version 4.1: a computer program for stochastic frontier production and cost function estimation: CEPA Working papers, No. 7/96. Department of Econometrics, University of New England, ArmidaleGoogle Scholar
  12. Coelli T, Fleming E (2004) Diversification economies and specialisation efficiencies in a mixed food and coffee smallholder farming system in Papua New Guinea. Agric Econ 31:229–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deressa TT, Hassan RM, Ringler C, Alemu T, Yesuf M (2009) Determinants of farmers’ choice of adaptation methods to climate change in the Nile Basin of Ethiopia. Glob Environ Chang 19:248–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Di Falco S, Verones M, Yesuf M (2011) Does adaptation to climate change provide food security? A micro-perspective from Ethiopia. Am J Agric Econ 93:829–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Esham M, Garforth C (2013) Agricultural adaptation to climate change: insights from a farming community in Sri Lanka. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 18:535–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. FAO (2014) The state of food insecurity in the world: strengthening the enabling environment for food security and nutrition. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  17. Finger R, Hediger W, Schmid S (2011) Irrigation as adaptation strategy to climate change—a biophysical and economic appraisal for Swiss maize production. Clim Chang 105:509–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hassan R, Nhemachena C (2008) Determinants of African farmers’ strategies for adapting to climate change: multinomial choice analysis. Afr J Agric Resour Econ 2:83–104Google Scholar
  19. Huang J, Wang Y, Wang J (2015) Farmers’ adaptation to extreme weather events through farm management and its impacts on the mean and risk of rice yield in China. Am J Agric Econ 97(2):602–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. IPCC (2001) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  21. IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: contribution of Working Group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Vol. 4): Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  22. Janvry AD, Sadoulet E (2006) Progress in the modeling of rural households' behavior under market failures. In: Janvry Ad, Kanbur R (eds) Poverty, inequality and development: essay in honor of Erik Thorbecks. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Khanal U, Wilson C, Hoang VN, Lee B (2018) Farmers’ adaptation to climate change, its determinants and impacts on rice yield in Nepal. Ecol Econ 144:139–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kompas T, Che TN (2006) Technology choice and efficiency on Australian dairy farms. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 50:65–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lobell DB (2014) Climate change adaptation in crop production: beware of illusions. Glob Food Sec 3:72–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Meeusen W, Van den Broeck J (1977) Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. Int Econ Rev 18:435–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mendelsohn R (2000) Efficient adaptation to climate change. Clim Chang 45:583–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. MoAD (2012) Statistical Information on Nepalese Agriculture 2011/12. Government of Nepal, Ministry of Agricultural Development, Agri-Business Promotion and Statistics Division, Agri statistics Section, Singha Durbar, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  29. MoF (2013) Economic survey: fiscal year 2012/13. Ministry of Finance, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  30. MoF (2014) Economic survey: fiscal year 2013/14. Ministry of Finance, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  31. Neumann K, Verburg PH, Stehfest E, Müller C (2010) The yield gap of global grain production: a spatial analysis. Agric Syst 103:316–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Niles MT, Brown M, Dynes R (2016) Farmer’s intended and actual adoption of climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies. Clim Chang 135:277–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. O’Donnell CJ, Rao DSP, Battese GE (2008) Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios. Empir Econ 34:231–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Omonona BT, Egbetokun O, Akanbi A (2010) Farmers resource-use and technical efficiency in cowpea production in Nigeria. J Econ Anal Policy 40:87–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rahman S (2011) Resource use efficiency under self-selectivity: the case of Bangladeshi rice producers. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 55:273–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rahman S, Rahman M (2009) Impact of land fragmentation and resource ownership on productivity and efficiency: the case of rice producers in Bangladesh. Land Use Policy 26:95–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sarker AR, Alam K, Gow J (2014) Assessing the effects of climate change on rice yields: an econometric investigation using Bangladeshi panel data. J Econ Anal Policy 44(4):405–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Solís D, Bravo-Ureta BE, Quiroga RE (2009) Technical efficiency among peasant farmers participating in natural resource management programmes in Central America. J Agric Econ 60:202–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Thiam A, Bravo-Ureta BE, Rivas TE (2001) Technical efficiency in developing country agriculture: a meta-analysis. Agric Econ 25:235–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wheeler T, Von Braun J (2013) Climate change impacts on global food security. Science 341:508–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Queensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations