Direct and component-wise bias correction of multi-variate climate indices: the percentile adjustment function diagnostic tool
The use and development of bias correction (BC) methods has grown fast in recent years, due to the increased demand of unbiased projections by many sectoral climate change impact applications. Case studies are frequently based on multi-variate climate indices (CIs) combining two or more essential climate variables that are frequently individually corrected prior to CI calculation. This poses the question of whether the BC method modifies the inter-variable dependencies and eventually the climate change signal. The direct bias correction of the multi-variate CI stands as a usual alternative, since it preserves the physical and temporal coherence among the primary variables as represented in the dynamical model output, at the expense of incorporating the individual biases on the CI with an effect difficult to foresee, particularly in the case of complex CIs bearing in their formulation non-linear relationships between components. Such is the case of the Fire Weather Index (FWI), a meteorological fire danger indicator frequently used in forest fire prevention and research. In the present work, we test the suitability of the direct BC approach on FWI as a representative multi-variate CI, assessing its performance in present climate conditions and its effect on the climate change signal when applied to future projections. Moreover, the results are compared with the common approach of correcting the input variables separately. To this aim, we apply the widely used empirical quantile mapping method (QM), adjusting the 99 empirical percentiles. The analysis of the percentile adjustment function (PAF) provides insight into the effect of the QM on the climate change signal. Although both approaches present similar results in the present climate, the direct correction introduces a greater modification of the original change signal. These results warn against the blind use of QM, even in the case of essential climate variables or uni-variate CIs.
All the statistical downscaling experiments have been computed using the MeteoLab software (http://www.meteo.unican.es/software/meteolab), an open-source Matlab toolbox for statistical downscaling. The authors are grateful to the Spanish Meteorological Agency (AEMET) for providing the observational data and Erika Coppola from the International Center of Theoretical Physics (ICTP) and Erik van Meijgaard from the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI) for making available the ENSEMBLES RegCM3 and RACMO2 regional climate models, respectively. We also thank two anonymous referees for their useful comments that helped to improve the original manuscript.
A.C. thanks the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness for the funding provided within the FPI program (BES-2011-047612). J.F. acknowledges support from the INSIGNIA project, co-funded by the Spanish R&D program (CGL2016-79210-R) and the European Regional Development Fund. This work was partially supported by the project MULTI-SDM (CGL2015-66583-R, MINECO/FEDER).
- Bedia J, Golding N, Casanueva A, Iturbide M, Buontempo C, Gutierrez JM (2017) Seasonal predictions of Fire Weather Index: paving the way for their operational applicability in Mediterranean Europe. Climate Services. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2017.04.001
- Casanueva A, Kotlarski S, Herrera S, Fernández J, Gutiérrez J, Boberg B, Colette A, Christensen OB, Goergen K, Jacob D, Keuler K, Nikulin G, Teichmann C, Vautard R (2016) Daily precipitation statistics in a EURO-CORDEX RCM ensemble: added value of raw and bias-corrected high-resolution simulations. Clim Dyn 47:719–737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2865-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cofiño A, Bedia J, Iturbide M, Vega M, Herrera S, Fernández J, Frías M, Manzanas R, Gutiérrez J (2017) The ecoms user data gateway: towards seasonal forecast data provision and research reproducibility in the era of climate services. Climate Services. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2017.07.001. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405880717300079
- Herrera S, Bedia J, Gutiérrez J, Fernández J, Moreno J (2013) On the projection of future fire danger conditions with various instantaneous/mean-daily data sources 118:827–840Google Scholar
- IPCC (2014). In: Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, Girma B, Kissel ES, Levy AN, MacCracken S, Mastrandrea PR, White LL (eds) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 1132Google Scholar
- Kotlarski S, Keuler K, Christensen OB, Colette A, Déqué M, Gobiet A, Goergen K, Jacob D, Lüthi D, van Meijgaard E, Nikulin G, Schär C, Teichmann C, Vautard R, Warrach-Sagi K, Wulfmeyer V (2014) Regional climate modeling on European scales: a joint standard evaluation of the EURO-CORDEX RCM ensemble. Geosci Model Dev 7(4):1297–1333. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1297-2014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Moriondo M, Good P, Durao R, Bindi M, Giannakopoulos C, Corte-Real J (2006) Potential impact of climate change on fire risk in the Mediterranean area 31:85–95Google Scholar
- Muerth MJ, Gauvin St-Denis B, Ricard S, Velázquez JA, Schmid J, Minville M, Caya D, Chaumont D, Ludwig R, Turcotte R (2013) On the need for bias correction in regional climate scenarios to assess climate change impacts on river runoff. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17(3):1189–1204. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1189-2013. https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/17/1189/2013/ CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pal JS, Giorgi F, Bi X, Elguindi N, Solmon F, Rauscher SA, Gao X, Francisco R, Zakey A, Winter J, Ashfaq M, Syed FS, Sloan LC, Bell JL, Diffenbaugh NS, Karmacharya J, Konar A, Martinez D, da Rocha RP, Steiner AL (2007) Regional climate modeling for the developing world: the ICTP RegCM3 and RegCNET. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 88(9):1395–1409. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-88-9-1395 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Panofsky HA, Brier GW (1968) Some applications of statistics to meteorology University Park : Penn. State University, College of Earth and Mineral SciencesGoogle Scholar
- Piani C, Haerter JO, Coppola E (2010a) Statistical bias correction for daily precipitation in regional climate models over Europe. Theor Appl Climatol 99 (1-2):187–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-009-0134-9
- Piani C, Weedon G, Best M, Gomes S, Viterbo P, Hagemann S, Haerter J (2010b) Statistical bias correction of global simulated daily precipitation and temperature for the application of hydrological models. J Hydrol 395(3):199–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.10.024. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169410006475
- van der Linden P, Mitchell J (eds.) (2009) ENSEMBLES: climate change and its impacts: summary of research and results from the ENSEMBLES project. Met Office Hadley Centre, FitzRoy Road, Exeter EX1 3PB, UKGoogle Scholar
- van Meijgaard E, van Ulft L, van de Berg W, Bosveld B, van der Hurk B, Gand Siebesma LA (2008) The KNMI regional atmospheric climate model RACMO version 2.1. Tech Rep 302Google Scholar
- van Wagner C, Pickett T (1985) Equations and FORTRAN program for the Canadian forest fire weather index system. Forestry Tech. Rep. 33 Canadian Forestry Service, Ottawa, CanadaGoogle Scholar
- van Wagner CE (1987) Development and structure of the Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index. Forestry Tech. Rep. 35 Canadian Forestry Service, Ottawa, CanadaGoogle Scholar