Avoiding dangerous climate change will require a rapid transition away from fossil fuels. By some estimates, global consumption and production of fossil fuels—particularly coal and oil—will need to end almost entirely within 50 years. Given the scale of such a transition, nations may need to consider policies that constrain growth in fossil fuel supplies in addition to those that reduce demand. Here, we examine the emissions implications of a supply-constraining measure that was rapidly gaining momentum in the United States (US) under the Obama administration: ceasing the issuance of new leases for fossil fuel extraction on federal lands and waters. Such a measure could reduce global carbon dioxide emissions by an estimated 280 million tons annually by 2030, comparable to that of other major climate policies adopted or considered by the Obama administration. Our findings suggest that measures to constrain fossil fuel supply—though not currently viable in a US Trump administration—deserve further consideration at subnational levels in the US or by other countries now, and by future US administrations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Aldina J (2013) Canada’s role as a global coal supplier. Coal Association of Canada 2013 Conference, Vancouver
Anderson K, McKibbin WJ (2000) Reducing coal subsidies and trade barriers: their contribution to greenhouse gas abatement. Environ Dev Econ 5(4):457–481
Bauer N, Mouratiadou I, Luderer G, Baumstark L, Brecha RJ, Edenhofer O, Kriegler E (2013) Global fossil energy markets and climate change mitigation—an analysis with REMIND. Climatic Change online 22 October
BLM (2017) Federal coal program: programmatic environmental impact statement-scoping report. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Washington, D.C.
BLM (2016) Notice of intent to prepare a programmatic environmental impact statement to review the federal coal program and to conduct public scoping meetings (no. 81 FR 17720, document no. 2016-07136). U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Washington, DC
Bordoff J, Houser T (2015) Navigating the U.S. oil export debate. Columbia University, Center on Global Energy Policy and Rhodium Group, New York
Briscoe MB (2017) Wild Earth Guardians & Sierra Club v. United States Bureau of Land Management and Wyoming Mining Association; BTU Western Resources, Inc; State of Wyoming; National Mining Association, Elisabeth A. Shumaker
Burger M, Wentz JA (2017) Downstream and upstream greenhouse gas emissions: the proper scope of NEPA review. Harvard Environmental Law Review 41(1):109–187. https://doi.org/10.7916/D81G0SS0
CARB (2017) The 2017 climate change scoping plan update: the proposed strategy for achieving California’s 2030 greenhouse gas target. California Air Resources Board
CEA (2016) The economics of coal leasing on federal lands: ensuring a fair return to taxpayers. White House Council of Economic Advisers, Washington, D.C
Copenhagen Economics (2017) The future of fossil fuels: how to steer fossil fuel use in a transition to a low-carbon energy system. Energy Transitions Commission
Davis SJ, Peters GP, Caldeira K (2011) The supply chain of CO2 emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:18554–18559
Energy Modeling Forum (2013) Changing the game? Emissions and market implications of new natural gas supplies (EMF Report 26). Stanford University, Stanford
Erickson P, Lazarus M (2014) Impact of the keystone XL pipeline on global oil markets and greenhouse gas emissions. Nat Clim Chang 4:778–781
Fæhn T, Hagem C, Lindholt L, Mæland S, Rosendahl KE (2017) Climate policies in a fossil fuel producing country: demand versus supply side policies. Energy J 38(1):77–102. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.38.1.tfae
Gillingham K, Stock JH (2016) Federal minerals leasing reform and climate policy. The Hamilton Project, Brookings
Geiling N (2017) France just became the second country in the world to end oil exploration. Think progress. Retrieved from https://thinkprogress.org/france-to-end-oil-extraction-2040-1dbb97ae7612/
Gerarden T, Reeder WS, Stock JH (2016) Federal Coal Program Reform, the Clean Power Plan, and the interaction of upstream and downstream climate policies (working paper no. 22214). National Bureau of Economic Research
Gurría A (2013) The climate challenge: achieving zero emissions. Lecture by the OECD Secretary-General London, 9 October 2013
Haftendorn C, Kemfert C, Holz F (2012) What about coal? Interactions between climate policies and the global steam coal market until 2030. Energy Policy 48:274–283
Haggerty M, Lawson M, Pearcy J (2015) Steam coal at an arm’s length: an evaluation of proposed reform options for US coal used in power generation (SSRN scholarly paper no. ID 2627865). Social Science Research Network, Rochester
Hamilton JD (2009) Understanding crude oil prices. Energy J 30:179–206
Headwaters Economics (2015) Federal coal lease database. Bozeman, MT
Heede R (2013) Tracing anthropogenic carbon dioxide and methane emissions to fossil fuel and cement producers, 1854–2010. Clim Chang 122:229–241
Huffman J, Lieu T, Honda M et al (2016) Keep it in the Ground Act of 2016
IEA (2015) World energy outlook 2015. International Energy Agency, Paris
IEA (2016) World energy outlook 2016. International Energy Agency, Paris
IEA (2017) Energy technology perspectives 2017. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris
IPCC (2006) 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES) on behalf of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Hayama
IPCC (2014) Summary for policymakers: climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University press, Cambridge and New York
Jaccard M, Hoffele J, Jaccard T (2018) Can carbon budgets and oil pipeline approvals be linked? [this issue]
Jiao JL, Fan Y, Wei Y-M (2009) The structural break and elasticity of coal demand in China: empirical findings from 1980-2006. Int J Glob Energy Issues 31:331–344
Joskow PL (1987) Contract duration and relationship-specific investments: empirical evidence from coal markets. Am Econ Rev 77:168–185
Lazarus M, Tempest K, Klevnas P, Korsbakken JI (2015) Natural gas: guardrails for a potential climate bridge. Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm and Seattle
Luppens JA, Scott DC (2015) Coal geology and assessment of coal resources and reserves in the Powder River Basin, Wyoming and Montana (USGS Numbered Series No. 1809), Professional paper. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston
Masnadi MS, Brandt AR (2017) Climate impacts of oil extraction increase significantly with oilfield age. Nature Clim Change 7:551–556
McGlade C, Ekins P (2015) The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2°C. Nature 517:187–190
McKinsey and Company (2007) Reducing U.S. greenhouse gas emissions: how much at what cost? The Conference Board, New York
Merkley J, Cardin B, Sanders B et al (2015) Keep it in the Ground Act of 2015
Metcalf G (2016) The impact of removing tax preferences for U.S. oil and gas production. Council on Foreign Relations
Miller LA, Bate RL (2011) Powder River basin coal resource and cost study: Campbell, Converse and Sheridan counties, Wyoming Big Horn, Powder River, Rosebud and Treasure counties, Montana (report no. 3155.001). Denver, CO
Muttitt G, McKinnon H, Stockman L, Kretzmann S, Scott A, Turnbull D (2016) The Sky’s limit: why the Paris climate goals require a managed decline of fossil fuel production. Oil Change International, Washington, D.C.
ONRR (2015) Statistical information. Office of Natural Resources Revenue
Paltsev S, Reilly JM, Jacoby HD, Morris JF (2009) The cost of climate policy in the United States. Energy Economics 31(supplement 2):S235–S243
Perloff JM (2007) Microeconomics, 4th ed. Pearson, London
Pierce BS, Dennen KO (2009) The national coal resource assessment overview, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper. United States Geological Survey, Reston
Piggot G, Erickson P, Lazarus M, van Asselt H (2017) Addressing fossil fuel production under the UNFCCC: Paris and beyond (working paper). Stockholm Environment Institute, Seattle
Rockström J, Gaffney O, Rogelj J, Meinshausen M, Nakicenovic N, Schellnhuber HJ (2017) A roadmap for rapid decarbonization. Science 355(6331):1269–1271
Rogelj J, Schaeffer M, Meinshausen M, Knutti R, Alcamo J, Riahi K, Hare W (2015) Zero emission targets as long-term global goals for climate protection. Environ Res Lett 10:105007
Rystad Energy (2016) Cube browser, version 1.18. Oslo, Norway
Rystad Energy (2017) UCube update and market perspectives. Oslo, Norway
Sathaye J, Meyers S (1995) Greenhouse gas mitigation assessment: a guidebook. Springer
Steininger KW, Schinko T (2016) Environmental policy in an open economy: refocusing climate policy to address international trade spillovers. In: Dynamic approaches to global economic challenges. Springer, Cham, pp 171–190
Sinn H-W (2012) The green paradox: a supply-side approach to global warming. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Stern DI (2012) Interfuel substitution: a meta-analysis. J Econ Surv 26:307–331
UNEP (2017) The emissions gap report 2017. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi
US EIA (2015a) Analysis of the impacts of the Clean Power Plan. U.S. Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC
US EIA (2015b) Monthly energy review, January 2015. U.S. Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC
US EPA (2012) Final rulemaking for 2017-2025 light-duty vehicle greenhouse gas emission standards and corporate average fuel economy standards (no. EPA-420-R-12-016). Assessment and Standards Division, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
US EPA (2013) Documentation for EPA base case v.5.13 using the integrated planning model (No. Report No. 450R13002). Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved from http://www2.epa.gov/airmarkets/power-sector-modeling-platform-v513
US EPA (2014) Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2013. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
US EPA (2015a) Proposed rulemaking for greenhouse gas emission standards and fuel efficiency standards for medium- and heavy-duty engines and vehicles–phase 2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
US EPA (2015b) Regulatory impact analysis for the Clean Power Plan final rule (no. EPA-452/R-15-003). Office of air and Radiation. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park
US GAO (2013) BLM could enhance appraisal process, more explicitly consider coal exports, and provide more public information. U.S. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC
Vulcan/ICF (2016) Federal Coal Leasing Reform Options: effects on CO2 emissions and energy markets. Fairfax, VA
Wolvovsky E, Anderson W (2016) OCS oil and Natural gas: potential lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions and social cost of carbon. U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Sterling
The authors thank Jeff Archibald, Mike McCormick, John Larsen, Peter Marsters, Paul Ekins, Michael Mellish, and Spencer Reeder for helpful discussions about data and methodology. Adrian Down at SEI-US provided research support, and Mark Haggerty of Headwaters Economics and Sivan Kartha of SEI-US helped review this article.
Funding support was provided by Friends of the Earth US.
This article is part of a Special Issue on “Fossil Fuel Supply and Climate Policy” edited by Harro van Asselt and Michael Lazarus.
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Cite this article
Erickson, P., Lazarus, M. Would constraining US fossil fuel production affect global CO2 emissions? A case study of US leasing policy. Climatic Change 150, 29–42 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2152-z