Climatic Change

, Volume 145, Issue 3–4, pp 539–548 | Cite as

The spatial distribution of Republican and Democratic climate opinions at state and local scales

  • Matto MildenbergerEmail author
  • Jennifer R. Marlon
  • Peter D. Howe
  • Anthony Leiserowitz


Even as US partisan polarization shapes climate and energy attitudes, substantial heterogeneity in climate opinions still exists among both Republicans and Democrats. To date, our understanding of this partisan heterogeneity has been limited to analysis of national- or, less commonly, state-level opinion poll subsamples. However, the dynamics of political representation and issue commitments play out over more finely resolved state and local scales. Here we use previously validated multilevel regression and post-stratification (MRP) models (Howe et al., Nat Clim Chang 5(6):596–603 2015; Mildenberger et al., PLoS One 11(8):e0159774 2016) combined with a novel approach to measuring the distribution of party members to model, for the first time, the spatial distribution of partisan climate and energy opinions. We find substantial geographic variation in Republican climate opinions across states and congressional districts. While Democratic party members consistently think human-caused global warming is happening and support climate policy reforms, the intensity of their climate beliefs also varies spatially at state and local scales. These results have policy-relevant implications for the trajectory of US climate policy reforms.



Thanks to Baobao Zhang, Chris Warshaw, Lyle Scruggs, and two anonymous reviewers for comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

Supplementary material

10584_2017_2103_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (46.1 mb)
(PDF 46.1 MB)


  1. Buttice MK, Highton B (2013) How does multilevel regression and poststratification perform with conventional national surveys?. Polit Anal 21(4):449–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carley S (2011) The era of state energy policy innovation: a review of policy instruments. Rev Policy Res 28(3):265–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Egan PJ, Mullin M (2017) Climate change: US public opinion. Annu Rev Polit Sci 20:209–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Guber DL (2013) A cooling climate for change? party polarization and the politics of global warming. Am Behav Sci 57(1):93–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Howe P, Mildenberger M, Marlon J, Leiserowitz A (2015) Geographic variation in opinions on climate change at state and local scales in the USA. Nat Clim Chang 5(6):596–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lax JR, Phillips JH (2009) How should we estimate public opinion in the states?. Am J Polit Sci 53(1):107–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Leiserowitz T, Maibach E, ReserRenouf C, Rosenthal S, Cutler M (2017) Trump voters and global warming. Yale University and George Mason Project on Climate Change CommunicationGoogle Scholar
  8. McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2011a) Cool dudes: the denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Glob Environ Chang 21(4):1163–1172Google Scholar
  9. McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2011b) The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. Sociol Q 52 (2):155–194Google Scholar
  10. Mildenberger M (2015) Fiddling while the world burns: the logic of double representation in comparative climate policymaking. PhD thesis, Yale University, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  11. Mildenberger M, Howe P, Lachapelle E, Stokes L, Marlon J, Gravelle T (2016) The distribution of climate change public opinion in Canada. PLoS One 11 (8):e0159774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Park DK, Gelman A, Bafumi J (2006) State-level opinions from national surveys: poststratification using multilevel logistic regression. In: Cohen JE (ed) Public opinion in state politics. Stanford University Press. 209–228Google Scholar
  13. Pew Research Center (2016) The politics of climateGoogle Scholar
  14. Rabe BG (2004) Statehouse and greenhouse: the emerging politics of American climate change policy. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  15. Raymond L (2016) Reclaiming the atmospheric commons: the regional greenhouse gas initiative and a new model of emissions trading. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Warshaw C, Rodden J (2012) How should we measure district-level public opinion on individual issues?. J Polit 74(01):203–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of California Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraUSA
  2. 2.School of Forestry and Environmental StudiesYale UniversityNew HavenUSA
  3. 3.Department of Environment and Society, Quinney College of Natural ResourcesUtah State UniversityLoganUSA

Personalised recommendations