Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Projecting future nonstationary extreme streamflow for the Fraser River, Canada

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We describe an efficient and flexible statistical modeling framework for projecting nonstationary streamflow extremes for the Fraser River basin in Canada, which is dominated by nival flow regime. The framework is based on an extreme value analysis technique that allows for nonstationarity in annual extreme streamflow by relating it to antecedent winter and spring precipitation and temperature. We used a representative suite of existing Variable Infiltration Capacity hydrologic model simulations driven by Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 3 (CMIP3) climate simulations to train and evaluate a nonlinear and nonstationary extreme value model of annual extreme streamflow. The model was subsequently used to project changes under CMIP5-based climate change scenarios. Using this combination of process-based and statistical modeling, we project that the moderate (e.g., 2–20-year return period) extreme streamflow events will decrease in intensity. In contrast, projections of high intensity events (e.g., 100–200-year return period), which reflect complex interactions between temperature and precipitation changes, are inconclusive. The results provide a basis for developing a general understanding of the future streamflow extremes changes in nival basins and through careful consideration and adoption of appropriate covariates, the methodology could be employed for basins spanning a range of hydro-climatological regimes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Cannon AJ (2010) A flexible nonlinear modelling framework for nonstationary generalized extreme value analysis in hydroclimatology. Hydrol Process 24:673–685. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon AJ (2014) GEVcdn: GEV conditional density estimation network. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/GEVcdn/index.html. Accessed 22 Jan 2015

  • Coles S (2001) An introduction to statistical modeling of extreme values. Springer Science & Business Media

  • Collins M, Knutti R, Arblaster J et al (2013) Long-term climate change: projections, commitments and irreversibility. In: Stocker T, Qin D, Plattner G et al (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, pp 1029–1136

  • Cooley D (2013) Return periods and return levels under climate change. In: AghaKouchak A, Easterling D, Hsu K et al (eds) Extremes in a changing climate. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 97–114

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cubasch U, Wuebbles D, Chen D et al (2013) Introduction. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K et al (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, pp 119–158

  • Déry SJ, Hernández-Henríquez MA, Owens PN et al (2012) A century of hydrological variability and trends in the Fraser River basin. Environ Res Lett 7:024019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/2/024019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebbwater Consulting (2015) Ebbwater Flood Map Project People living in BC floodplains. http://www.ebbwater.ca/wp/people-living-in-bc-floodplains/. Accessed 16 Sep 2016

  • Fraser Basin Council (2015) Flood and the Fraser. http://www.fraserbasin.bc.ca/water_flood_fraser.html. Accessed 24 Jul 2017

  • Hirabayashi Y, Mahendran R, Koirala S et al (2013) Global flood risk under climate change. Nat Clim Chang 3:816–821. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington TG (2006) Evidence for intensification of the global water cycle: review and synthesis. J Hydrol 319:83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakob M, Church M (2011) The trouble with floods. Can Water Resour J Rev Can Ressour Hydr 36:287–292. https://doi.org/10.4296/cwrj3604928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez Cisneros BE, Oki T, Arnell NW et al (2014) Freshwater resources. In: Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ et al (eds) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 229–269

  • Kang DH, Gao H, Shi X et al (2016) Impacts of a rapidly declining mountain snowpack on streamflow timing in Canada’s Fraser River basin. Sci Rep 6:19299. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz RW (2013) Statistical methods for nonstationary extremes. In: AghaKouchak A, Easterling D, Hsu K et al (eds) Extremes in a changing climate. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 15–37

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Katz RW, Parlange MB, Naveau P (2002) Statistics of extremes in hydrology. Adv Water Resour 25:1287–1304. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(02)00056-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kharin VV, Zwiers FW (2005) Estimating extremes in transient climate change simulations. J Clim 18:1156–1173. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3320.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kharin VV, Zwiers FW, Zhang X, Wehner M (2013) Changes in temperature and precipitation extremes in the CMIP5 ensemble. Clim Chang. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0705-8

  • Kundzewicz ZW, Kanae S, Seneviratne SI et al (2013) Flood risk and climate change: global and regional perspectives. Hydrol Sci J 59:1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.857411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang X, Lettenmaier DP, Wood EF, Burges SJ (1994) A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models. J Geophys Res Atmospheres 99:14415–14428. https://doi.org/10.1029/94JD00483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang X, Xie Z, Huang M (2003) A new parameterization for surface and groundwater interactions and its impact on water budgets with the variable infiltration capacity (VIC) land surface model. J Geophys Res Atmospheres 108:8613. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer EP, Hidalgo HG (2008) Utility of daily vs. monthly large-scale climate data: an intercomparison of two statistical downscaling methods. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 12:551–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meehl GA, Covey C, Delworth T et al (2007) The WCRP CMIP3 multimodel dataset—a new era in climate change research. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 88:1383–1394. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-88-9-1383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milly P, Betancourt J, Falkenmark M et al (2008) Stationarity is dead: whither water management? Science 319:573–574. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1151915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musselman KN, Clark MP, Liu C et al (2017) Slower snowmelt in a warmer world. Nat Clim Chang 7:214–219. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Northwest Hydraulic Consultants (2008) Comprehensive review of Fraser at Hope flood hydrology and flows—scoping study. Surrey, BC

  • Northwest Hydraulic Consultants (2016) Regional assessment of flood vulnerability. North Vancouver, BC

  • Panagoulia D, Economou P, Caroni C (2014) Stationary and nonstationary generalized extreme value modelling of extreme precipitation over a mountainous area under climate change. Environmetrics 25:29–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/env.2252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Public Safety Canada (2015) Floods. http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/mrgnc-mngmnt/ntrl-hzrds/fld-eng.aspx. Accessed 14 Sep 2016

  • Ramesh A (2013) Response of flood events to land use and climate change. Springer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rootzén H, Katz RW (2013) Design life level: quantifying risk in a changing climate. Water Resour Res 49:5964–5972. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salas J, Obeysekera J (2014) Revisiting the concepts of return period and risk for nonstationary hydrologic extreme events. J Hydrol Eng 19:554–568. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandink D, Kovacs P, Oulaheen G, McGillivray G (2010) Making floods insurable for Canadian homeowners: a discussion paper. Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction & Swiss Reinsurance Company Ltd., Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnorbus M, Bennett K, Werner A (2010) Quantifying the water resource impacts of mountain pine beetle and associated salvage harvest operations across a range of watershed scales: hydrologic modeling of the Fraser River basin. Canadian Forest Service Publications

  • Schnorbus MA, Cannon AJ (2014) Statistical emulation of streamflow projections from a distributed hydrological model: application to CMIP3 and CMIP5 climate projections for British Columbia, Canada. Water Resour Res n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015279

  • Serinaldi F, Kilsby CG (2015) Stationarity is undead: uncertainty dominates the distribution of extremes. Adv Water Resour 77:17–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2014.12.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha RR, Schnorbus MA, Peters DL (2016) Assessment of a hydrologic model’s reliability in simulating flow regime alterations in a changing climate. Hydrol Process 30:2628–2643. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha RR, Schnorbus MA, Werner AT, Berland AJ (2012) Modelling spatial and temporal variability of hydrologic impacts of climate change in the Fraser River basin, British Columbia, Canada. Hydrol Process 26:1840–1860. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simm J, Wallis M, Smith P et al (2012) The significance of failure modes in the design and management of levees—a perspective from the International Levee handbook team. In: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Flood Risk Management. CRC Press, Rotterdam, pp 1–15

  • Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, Meehl GA (2012) An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 93:485–498. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Towler E, Rajagopalan B, Gilleland E et al (2010) Modeling hydrologic and water quality extremes in a changing climate: a statistical approach based on extreme value theory. Water Resour Res 46:W11504. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008876

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasiliades L, Galiatsatou P, Loukas A (2014) Nonstationary frequency analysis of annual maximum rainfall using climate covariates. Water Resour Manag 29:339–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0761-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood A, Leung L, Sridhar V, Lettenmaier D (2004) Hydrologic implications of dynamical and statistical approaches to downscaling climate model outputs. Clim Chang 62:189–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Wang J, Zwiers FW, Groisman PY (2010) The influence of large-scale climate variability on winter maximum daily precipitation over North America. J Clim 23:2902–2915. https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3249.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge funding received for this project from the Flood Safety Section, Ministry of Forests Lands and Natural Resource Operations, B.C. Government. We thank three anonymous reviewers for comments towards an improved version of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Watershed Hydrology and Ecology Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, V8W 3R4, Canada

    Rajesh R. Shrestha

  2. Pacific Climate Impacts Consortium, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, V8W 2Y2, Canada

    Rajesh R. Shrestha, Markus A. Schnorbus & Francis W. Zwiers

  3. Climate Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, V8W 2Y2, Canada

    Alex J. Cannon

Authors
  1. Rajesh R. Shrestha
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alex J. Cannon
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Markus A. Schnorbus
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Francis W. Zwiers
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajesh R. Shrestha.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 2.00 mb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shrestha, R.R., Cannon, A.J., Schnorbus, M.A. et al. Projecting future nonstationary extreme streamflow for the Fraser River, Canada. Climatic Change 145, 289–303 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-2098-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-2098-6

Profiles

  1. Alex J. Cannon View author profile