Advertisement

Climatic Change

, Volume 149, Issue 1, pp 57–74 | Cite as

Managing urban water systems with significant adaptation deficits—unified framework for secondary cities: part II—the practice

  • Assela PathiranaEmail author
  • Mohanasundar Radhakrishnan
  • Richard Ashley
  • Nguyen Hong Quan
  • Chris Zevenbergen
Article

Abstract

Adaptation gaps are shortcomings of a system responding to climate change, whereas adaptation deficits are shortcomings in providing services. These two drivers for adaptation are often in conflict in many secondary cities in the global south (SCGS). It is possible to align these seemingly conflicting drivers into a productive unity, a conceptual alignment, which is the first step in achieving harmony while implementing adaptation actions. This paper focuses on the practical aspects of implementing aligned adaptation action that leads to improvements in liveability, sustainability, and resilience of SCGS. At an abstract level, the nature of the adaptation problem is similar to the complex problems identified in various domains, such as software development, manufacturing, and supply chain management. The widely accepted “agile principles”—used in the above domains—is the basis for developing a set of twelve principles for urban adaptation, which are synthesized from numerous recent studies that have implicitly proposed or applied most of these principles to climate change adaptation in urban settings. These principles lead to four essential objectives appertaining to the process of sustainable urban adaptation. The urban agile principles are used to analyze the current state of adaptation of Can Tho City in Vietnam and to ascertain the agile ways of addressing its adaptation challenges. Analysis of the outcomes shows that harmonized approaches can simultaneously address both adaptation deficits and gaps.

References

  1. 100 Resilient Cities (2017) City Strategies. http://www.100resilientcities.org/strategies#/-_/. Accessed 27th March 2017
  2. Aerts JCJH, Botzen WJW, Emanuel K, Lin N, de Moel H, Michel-Kerjan EO (2014) Evaluating flood resilience strategies for coastal megacities. Science 344:473–475.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1248222 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen C, Birge H, Bartelt-Hunt S, Bevans R, Burnett J, Cosens B, Cai X, Garmestani A, Linkov I, Scott E, Solomon M, Uden D (2016) Avoiding decline: fostering resilience and sustainability in midsize cities. Sustainability 8:844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashley RM, Blanskby J, Newman R, Gersonius B, Poole A, Lindley G, Smith S, Ogden S, Nowell R (2012) Learning and action alliances to build capacity for flood resilience. J Flood Risk Manag 5:14–22.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-318X.2011.01108.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashley MR, Digman CJ, Horton B (2016) Demonstrating and monetizing the multiple benefits from using sustainable drainage. In: World Water Congress, Brisbane, Australia, IWAGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck K, Beedle M, van Bennekum A, Cockburn A, Cunningham W, Fowler M, Grenning J, Highsmith J, Hunt A, Jeffries R, Kern J, Marick B, Martin R, Mallor S, Shwaber K, Sutherland J (2001) The Agile Manifesto. Agile manifesto.org. http://agilemanifesto.org/. Accessed 06/10/2016 2016
  7. Bernardes ES, Hanna MD (2009) A theoretical review of flexibility, agility and responsiveness in the operations management literature: toward a conceptual definition of customer responsiveness. Int J Oper Prod Manag 29:30–53.  https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570910925352 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Birkmann J, Garschagen M, Van Tuan V, Binh N (2012) Vulnerability, coping and adaptation to water related hazards in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta. In: Renaud FG, Kuenzer C (eds) The Mekong Delta System. Springer Environmental Science and Engineering. Springer Netherlands, pp 245–289. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3962-8_10
  9. Brown R, Keath N, Wong T (2009) Urban water management in cities: historical, current and future regimes. Water Sci Technol—WST 59:847–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burton I (2004) Climate change and adaptation deficit. In: Adam Fenech RBR, Don MacIver and Heather Auld (ed) International Conference on Adaptation Science, Management and Policy Options, Lijiang, Yunnan, China, May 17–19, 2004. AIRG, Meteorogical Service of Canada, Environment Canada, pp 25–33Google Scholar
  11. Cettner A, Ashley R, Hedström A, Viklander M (2014) Assessing receptivity for change in urban stormwater management and contexts for action. J Environ Manag 146:29–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chang M (2010) Agile and Crystal Clear with Library IT Innovations. In: VALA2010 ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  13. Chu E, Anguelovski I, Carmin J (2015) Inclusive approaches to urban climate adaptation planning and implementation in the global south climate policy:1-21 doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1019822
  14. Clemens M, Rijke J, Pathirana A, Quan NH (2014) Effective stakeholder analysis for urban flood resilience in Vietnam using design proposition. Paper presented at the 13 th International Conference on Urban Drainage, Sarawak, Malaysia, 7–12 September 2014Google Scholar
  15. Dunn G, Brown R, Bos JJ, Bakker K (2016) Standing on the shoulders of the giants: understanding changes in urban water practices through the lens of complexity sciences. Urban Water.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2016.1241284
  16. EEA (2016) Urban adaptation to climate change in Europe : transforming cities in a changing climate. European Environment Agency, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  17. Fowler M, Highsmith J (2001) The agile manifesto Software Development 9:28–35Google Scholar
  18. Garschagen M (2014) Risky change? Vulnerability and adaptation between climate change and transformation dynamics in Can Tho City, Vietnam vol 15. Megacities and Global Change, SteinerGoogle Scholar
  19. Gersonius B, Ashley R, Pathirana A, Zevenbergen C (2012a) Adaptation of flood risk infrastructure to climate resilience. Proc Inst Civ Eng Civ Eng 165:40–45.  https://doi.org/10.1680/cien.11.00053 Google Scholar
  20. Gersonius B, Nasruddin F, Ashley R, Jeuken A, Pathirana A, Zevenbergen C (2012b) Developing the evidence base for mainstreaming adaptation of stormwater systems to climate change. Water Res 46:6824–6835.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.03.060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gersonius B, Ashley R, Pathirana A, Zevenbergen C (2013) Climate change uncertainty: building flexibility into water and flood risk infrastructure. Clim Chang 116:411–423.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0494-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hallegatte S, Henriet F, Corfee-Morlot J (2011) The economics of climate change impacts and policy benefits at city scale: a conceptual framework. Clim Chang 104:51–87.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9976-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holweg M (2005) The three dimensions of responsiveness. Int J Oper Prod Manag 25:603–622.  https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570510605063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huong H, Pathirana A (2013) Urbanization and climate change impacts on future urban flood risk in Can Tho city. Vietnam Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 17:379–394.  https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-379-2013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hurley L, Ashley R, Mounce S (2008) Addressing practical problems in sustainability assessment frameworks. Proc Inst Civ Eng - Eng Sustain 161:23–30.  https://doi.org/10.1680/ensu.2008.161.1.23 Google Scholar
  26. IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Summaries, frequently asked questions, and cross-chapter boxes A Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Field, C.B., V.R. Barros, D.J. Dokken, K.J. Mach, M.D. Mastrandrea, T.E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K.L. Ebi, Y.O. Estrada, R.C. Genova, B. Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. MacCracken,P.R. Mastrandrea, and L.L. White (eds.)]:190Google Scholar
  27. Kettunen P (2009) Adopting key lessons from agile manufacturing to agile software product development—a comparative study. Technovation 29:408–422.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Klijn F, Kreibich H, de Moel H, Penning-Rowsell E (2015) Adaptive flood risk management planning based on a comprehensive flood risk conceptualisation. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change:1–20 doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-015-9638-z
  29. Koste LL, Malhotra MK (1999) A theoretical framework for analyzing the dimensions of manufacturing flexibility. J Oper Manag 18:75–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(99)00010-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leffingwell D (2010) Agile software requirements: lean requirements practices for teams, programs, and the enterprise. Addison-Wesley ProfessionalGoogle Scholar
  31. McGaughey RE (1999) Internet technology: contributing to agility in the twenty-first century. Int J Agil Manag Syst 1:7–13.  https://doi.org/10.1108/14654659910266655 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. MDP (2013) Mekong Delta Plan—Long-term vision and strategy for a safe, prosperous and sustainable delta. Ministry of Natural Rescources and Environment—Vietnam, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development—Vietnam, Kingdom of Netherlands, Consortium of Royal HaskoningDHV, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Deltares, Rebel, Water.nl, Amersfoot, NertherlandsGoogle Scholar
  33. Moench M, Tyler S, Lage J (2011) Catalyzing Urban Climate Resilience: Applying Resilience Concepts to Planning Practice in the ACCCRN Program (2009–2011). Institute for Social and Environmental Transition, InternationalGoogle Scholar
  34. Pathirana A, Radhakrishnan M, Quan NH, Zevenbergen C (2017) Managing urban water systems with significant adaptation deficits—unified framework for secondary cities : part I—conceptual framework. Clim Change:1–14 doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-1953-9
  35. Pham CH, Ehlers E, Subramanian SV (2009) Dyke system planning: theory and practice in Can Tho City, Vietnam. ZEF Working Paper Series,Google Scholar
  36. PM (2013) Decision 567, 568 dated 14 September 2013 of the Prime Minister (PM) approving Socio Economic Development Plan of Can Tho city till 2020 and Vision 2030. Prime Ministers Office, Ha NoiGoogle Scholar
  37. Poustie MS, Frantzeskaki N, Brown RR (2016) A transition scenario for leapfrogging to a sustainable urban water future in Port Vila, Vanuatu. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 105:129–139.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.12.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pressman RS (2005) Software engineering: a practitioner's approach. Palgrave MacmillanGoogle Scholar
  39. Quan NH, Phi HL, Tran PG, Radhakrishnan M, Quang CNX, Thuyen LX, Vinh KQ (2014) Urban retention basin in developing city: from theoretical effectiveness to practical feasibility. Paper presented at the 13th International Conference on Urban Drainage, Kuching, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  40. Radhakrishnan M (2015) Closing the gap between knowledge and practice. Mare Asia. http://mare-asia.net/closing-the-gap-between-knowledge-and-practice/. Accessed 12 Feb 2016
  41. Radhakrishnan M, Quan NH, Gersonius B, Pathirana A, Vinh KQ, Ashley MR, Zevenbergen C (2017) Coping capacities for improving adaptation pathways for flood protection in Can Tho, Vietnam Clim Change doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-1999-8
  42. Revi A, Satterthwaite DE, Aragón-Durand F, Corfee-Morlot J, Kiunsi RBR, Pelling M, Roberts DC, Solecki W (2014) Urban areas. In: Field CB et al. (eds) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp 535–612Google Scholar
  43. Roberts BH (2014) Managing Systems of Secondary Cities—policy responses in international development. City Alliance / UNOPS, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  44. Rogers CD, Lombardi DR, Leach JM, Cooper R (2012) The urban futures methodology applied to urban regeneration proceedings of ICE engineering. Sustainability 165:5–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sánchez AM, Pérez MP (2005) Supply chain flexibility and firm performance: a conceptual model and empirical study in the automotive industry. Int J Oper Prod Manag 25:681–700.  https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570510605090 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sayers P, Galloway G, Penning-Rowsell E, Yuanyuan L, Fuxin S, Yiwei C, Kang W, Le Quesne T, Wang L, Guan Y (2015) Strategic flood management: ten ‘golden rules’ to guide a sound approach international. J River Basin Manag 13:137–151.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2014.902378 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. SCE (2013) Can Tho ( Vietnam) : Comprehensive Resilience Planning For Integrated Flood Risk Mangement—Final Report WorldBankGoogle Scholar
  48. Spiller M, Vreeburg JHG, Leusbrock I, Zeeman G (2015) Flexible design in water and wastewater engineering—definitions, literature and decision guide. J Environ Manag 149:271–281.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.09.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tyler S, Moench M (2012) A framework for urban climate resilience. Clim Dev 4:311–326.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2012.745389 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. UNEP (2014) The adaptation gap report 2014. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), NairobiGoogle Scholar
  51. Wendler R (2013) The structure of agility from different perspectives. In: Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS), 2013 Federated Conference on, 8–11 Sept. 2013 pp 1177–1184Google Scholar
  52. World Bank (2014) Can Tho, Vietnam enhancing urban resilience : cities strength—resilient cities program. The World Bank Group, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  53. Young K, Hall JW (2015) Introducing system interdependency into infrastructure appraisal: from projects to portfolios to pathways. Infrastructure Complexity 2:1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40551-015-0005-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zevenbergen C, van de Guchte C, Pathirana A, Wieriks K, Heineke N V (2015) Water and Delta-Cities: Accelerating Urban Resilience Paper presented at the International Conference on Earth Observation & Societal Impacts and ICLEI Resilience Forum, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC, June 28–30Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water EducationDelftNetherlands
  2. 2.Cooperative research centre for Water Sensitive CitiesClaytonAustralia
  3. 3.Institute for Environment and Resources (IER) – Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City (VNU HCM)Ho Chi Minh cityVietnam

Personalised recommendations