Skip to main content

Translating national level forest service goals to local level land management: carbon sequestration

Abstract

The USDA Forest Service has many national level policies related to multiple use management. However, translating national policy to stand level forest management can be difficult. As an example of how a national policy can be put into action, we examined three case studies in which a desired future condition is evaluated at the national, region, and local scale. We chose to use carbon sequestration as the desired future condition because climate change has become a major area of concern during the last decade. Several studies have determined that the 193 million acres of US national forest land currently sequester 11 to 15% of the total carbon emitted as a nation. This paper provides a framework by which national scale strategies for maintaining or enhancing forest carbon sequestration is translated through regional considerations and local constraints in adaptive management practices. Although this framework used the carbon sequestration as a case study, this framework could be used with other national level priorities such as the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) or the Endangered Species Act (ESA).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Achtemeier GL, Goodrick SA, Liu Y, Garcia-Menendez F, Hu Y, Odman MT (2011) Modeling smoke plume rise and dispersion from southern United States prescribed burns with daysmoke. Atmosphere 2(3):358–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birdsey R, Pregitzer K, Lucier A (2006) Forest carbon management in the United States: 1600–2100. J Environ Qual 35(4):1461–1469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer WD (1990) Longleaf pine. In: Burns RM, Honkala BH. (Tech. Coords.) Silvics of North America: 1. Conifers; 2. Hardwoods. Agriculture handbook 654, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, D.C. vol. 2, 877 p

  • Carter MC, Foster CD (2004) Prescribed burning and productivity in southern pine forests: a review. For Ecol Manag 191(1):93–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Certini G (2005) Effects of fire on properties of forest soils: a review. Oecologia 143(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza JK, Terando AJ, McKerrow AJ, Collazo JA (2015) Modeling climate change, urbanization, and fire effects on Pinus palustris ecosystems of the southeastern US. J Environ Manag 151:186–199

  • Croker TC, Boyer WD (1975) Regenerating longleaf pine naturally. Southern Forest Experiment Station, Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture, p 26

  • Davis SC, Hessl AE, Scott CJ, Adams MB, Thomas RB (2009) Forest carbon sequestration changes in response to timber harvest. Forest Ecol Manag 258:2101–2109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dilustro JJ, Collins BS, Duncan LK, Sharitz RR (2002) Soil texture, land-use intensity, and vegetation of Fort Benning upland forest sites. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society, 289–297

  • Di Tomaso JM, Brooks ML, Allen EB, Minnich R, Rice PM, Kyser GB (2006) Control of invasive weeds with prescribed burning 1. Weed Technol 20:535–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox TR, Jokela EJ, Allen HL (2007) The development of pine plantation silviculture in the southern United States. J For 105:337–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost CC (1993) Four centuries of changing landscape patterns in the longleaf pine ecosystem. In Proceedings of the Tall Timbers fire ecology conference 18:17–43

  • Gilliam FS, Platt WJ (1999) Effects of long-term fire exclusion on tree species composition and stand structure in an old-growth Pinus palustris (longleaf pine) forest. Plant Ecol 140:15–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glitzenstein JS, Platt WJ, Streng DR (1995) Effects of fire regime and habitat on tree dynamics in north Florida longleaf pine savannas. Ecol Monogr 65:441–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyvonen R, Agren GI, Linder S, Persson T, Cotrufo MF, Ekblad A, Freeman M, Freeman M, Grelle A, Janssens IA, Jarvis PG, Kellomäki S, Lindroth A, Loustau D, Lundmark T, Norby RJ, Oren R, Pilegaard K, Ryan MG, Sigurdsson BD, Strömgren M, van Oijen M, Wallin G (2007) The likely impact of elevated CO2, nitrogen deposition, increased temperature and management on carbon sequestration in temperate and boreal forest ecosystems: a literature review. New Phytol 173:462–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen KH, Butnor JR, Kush JS, Schmidtling RC, Nelson CD (2009) Hurricane Katrina winds damaged longleaf pine less than loblolly pine. South J Appl For 33:178–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen KH, Keyser TL, Butnor JR, Gonzalez-Benecke CA, Kaczmarek DJ, Maier CA, Sun G (2013) Productivity and carbon sequestration of forest in the Southern United States. In: Productivity and carbon sequestration of forests in the Southern United States. Climate change adaptation and mitigation management options: a guide for natural resource managers in southern forest ecosystems. p 492

  • Kartesz JT, Meacham CA (1999) Synthesis of the North American flora. North Carolina Botanical Garden, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill

  • Keyser TL, Zarnoch SJ (2012) Thinning, age, and site quality influence live tree carbon stocks in upland hardwood forests of the southern Appalachians. For Sci 58:407–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Kush JS, Meldahl RS, McMahon CK, Boyer WD (2004) Longleaf pine: a sustainable approach for increasing terrestrial carbon in the southern United States. Environ Manag 33:S139–S147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landers JL, Van Lear DH, Boyer WD (1995) The longleaf pine forests of the southeast: requiem or renaissance? J Forestry 93:39–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin KL, Hurteau MD, Hungate BA, Koch GW, North MP (2015) Carbon tradeoffs of restoration and provision of endangered species habitat in a fire-maintained forest. Ecosystems 18:76–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinley DC, Ryan MG, Birdsey RA, Giardina CP, Harmon ME, Heath LS, Houghton RA, Jackson RB, Morrison JF, Murray BC, Pataki DE, Skog KE (2011) A synthesis of current knowledge on forests and carbon storage in the United States. Ecol Appl 21(6):1902–1924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNulty SG, Boggs JL, Sun G (2014) The rise of the mediocre forest: why chronically stressed trees may better survive extreme episodic climate variability. New For 45:403–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Melvin MA (2015). 2015 national PB use survey report. Coalition of PB Councils Inc. Tech. Rep. 02–15, 22 pp. [Available online at http://www.stateforesters.org/sites/default/files/publication-documents/2015 PB Use Survey Report.pdf]

  • Millar CI, Stephenson NL, Stephens SL (2007) Climate change and forests of the future: managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecol Appl 17:2145–2151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore PT, DeRose RJ, Long JN, van Miegroet H (2012) Using silviculture to influence carbon sequestration in southern Appalachian spruce-fir forests. Forests 3:300–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Climate Assessment and Development Advisory Committee (NCADAC) (2014) National Climate Assessment report. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC. Available online at http://ncadac.globalchange.gov/; last accessed Jan. 16, 2017

  • Outcalt KW, Sheffield RM (1996). The longleaf pine forest: trends and current c conditions. Resour. Bull. SRS. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, p 28

  • Pickering J, Kays R, Meier A, Andrew S, Yatskievych R (2003) The Appalachians. Wilderness Earth’s last wild places. Conservation International, Washington, DC, p 576

    Google Scholar 

  • Rankin WT, Herbert N (2014) Restoration in the southern Appalachians: a dialogue among scientists, planners, and land managers. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-GTR-189. USDA-Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, p 48

  • Reinhardt ED, Holsinger L, Keane R (2010) Effects of biomass removal treatments on stand-level fire characteristics in major forest types of the northern Rocky Mountains. West J Appl For 25:34–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Renninger HJ, Clark KL, Skowronski N, Schäfer KV (2013) Effects of a prescribed fire on water use and photosynthetic capacity of pitch pines. Trees 27:1115–1127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwenk WS, Donovan TM, Keeton WS, Nunery JS (2012) Carbon storage, timber production, and biodiversity: comparing ecosystem services with multi-criteria decision analysis. Ecol Appl 22:1612–1627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanturf JA, Wade DD, Waldrop TA, Kennard DK, Achtemeier GL (2002) Background paper: fire in southern forest landscapes. P 607–630 in Southern Forest Resource Assessment, Wear, D. N. and J. G. Greis (eds.). USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-53. 635 p

  • USDA (2014) Strategic Plan FY 2014–2018. Available online at https://www.ocfo.usda.gov/usdasp/sp2014/usda-strategic-plan-fy-2014-2018.pdf; last accessed 7 July 2017

  • USDA (2016) USDA Building Blocks for Climate Smart Agriculture and Forestry. Available online at https://www.usda.gov/sites/default/files/documents/building-blocks-implementation-plan-progress-report.pdf; last accessed 7 July 2017

  • USDA Forest Service (1960) Multiple-Use Sustained-Yield Act. Available online at http://www.fs.fed.us/emc/nfma/includes/musya60.pdf; last accessed 15 Jan 2017

  • USDA Forest Service (2001) U.S. forest facts and historical trends. Available online at http://www.fia.fs.fed.us/library/briefings-summariesoverviews/docs/ForestFactsMetric.pdf; last accessed 27 Jan 2017

  • USDA Forest Service (2007) The U.S. Forest Service—an overview. Available online at http://www.fs.fed.us/documents/USFS_An_Overview_0106MJS.pdf; last accessed 24 Jan 2017

  • USDA Forest Service (2010) Climate Change Considerations in Land Management Plan Revisions. Available online at http://www.fs.fed.us/emc/nepa/climate_change/includes/cc_land_mgmt_plan_rev_012010.pdf; last accessed 15 Jan 2017

  • USDA Forest Service (2012) National Forest System land management planning. Available online at http://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb5362536.pdf; last accessed 17 Jan 2017

  • US EPA (2017) Inventory of US greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990–2015. EPA 430-P-17-001. 633 p

  • US Fish and Wildlife Service (2003) Recovery plan for the Red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) second revision. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Atlanta, Georgia.

  • Vose JM, Peterson DL, Patel-Weynand T (2012) Effects of climatic variability and change on forest ecosystems: a comprehensive science synthesis for the U.S. forest sector. USDA for. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-870. 265 p

  • Wade DD, Lundsford J (1990) Fire as a forest management tool: prescribed burning in the southern United States. Unasylva 41:28–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade DD, Brock BL, Brose PH, Grace JB, Hoch GA, Patterson III WA (2000). Fire in eastern ecosystems. P 53–96 in Wildland fire in ecosystems: effects of fire on flora, Brown JK, Smith JK (eds.). USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-42. 256 p

  • Wear DN, Greis JG (2012). The southern forest futures project: summary report. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-GTR-168. 54 p

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the USDA Forest Service Eastern Forest Environmental Threat Assessment Center cooperative agreement 11-CR-11330147-016.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven McNulty.

Additional information

This article is part of a Special Issue on ‘Vulnerability Assessment of US Agriculture and Forests developed by the USDA Climate Hubs’ edited by Jerry L. Hatfield, Rachel Steele, Beatrice van Horne, and William Gould.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McNulty, S., Treasure, E., Jennings, L. et al. Translating national level forest service goals to local level land management: carbon sequestration. Climatic Change 146, 133–144 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-2046-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-2046-5