The impacts of rising temperatures on aircraft takeoff performance
- 8.5k Downloads
Steadily rising mean and extreme temperatures as a result of climate change will likely impact the air transportation system over the coming decades. As air temperatures rise at constant pressure, air density declines, resulting in less lift generation by an aircraft wing at a given airspeed and potentially imposing a weight restriction on departing aircraft. This study presents a general model to project future weight restrictions across a fleet of aircraft with different takeoff weights operating at a variety of airports. We construct performance models for five common commercial aircraft and 19 major airports around the world and use projections of daily temperatures from the CMIP5 model suite under the RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 emissions scenarios to calculate required hourly weight restriction. We find that on average, 10–30% of annual flights departing at the time of daily maximum temperature may require some weight restriction below their maximum takeoff weights, with mean restrictions ranging from 0.5 to 4% of total aircraft payload and fuel capacity by mid- to late century. Both mid-sized and large aircraft are affected, and airports with short runways and high temperatures, or those at high elevations, will see the largest impacts. Our results suggest that weight restriction may impose a non-trivial cost on airlines and impact aviation operations around the world and that adaptation may be required in aircraft design, airline schedules, and/or runway lengths.
We acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme’s Working Group on Coupled Modelling, which is responsible for the CMIP, and we thank the climate modeling groups for producing and making available their model output. For the CMIP, the US Department of Energy’s Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison provided coordinating support and led the development of software infrastructure in partnership with the Global Organization for Earth System Science Portals. Funding for this research was provided through NSF grant number DGE-11-44155 and the US DOI.
E.D.C. and T.R.T. jointly conceived of the study, conducted the analyses, and wrote the paper. R.M.H. provided the input at all stages.
- Anderson JD (2015) Introduction to flight. McGraw-Hill Education, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Boeing (2013). 737 airplane characteristics for airport planningGoogle Scholar
- Collins, M. et al., (2013) in Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Working Group I Contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) (Cambridge University Press, New York) (eds. Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
- Dole R et al (2011) Was there a basis for anticipating the 2010 Russian heat wave? Geophys Res Lett 38Google Scholar
- EUROCONTROL (2004). Experimental centre. User manual for the Base of Aircraft Data (BADA)Google Scholar
- Horton RM, Coffel ED, Winter JM, Bader DA (2015) Projected changes in extreme temperature events based on the NARCCAP model suite. Geophys Res Lett:1–10. doi: 10.1002/2015GL064914
- ICAO (2016) Environmental reportGoogle Scholar
- Pal JS, Eltahir EAB (2015) Future temperature in southwest Asia projected to exceed a threshold for human adaptability. Nat Clim Chang 18203:1–4Google Scholar
- Parris, A. et al. (2012). Global sea level rise scenarios for the United States National Climate Assessment. At http://cpo.noaa.gov/sites/cpo/Reports/2012/NOAA_SLR_r3.pdf
- Stott PA, Stone DA, Allen MR (2004) Human contribution to the European heatwave of 2003. Nature. doi: 10.1029/2001JB001029
- Thompson TR (2016) Aviation and the impacts of climate change ∙ climate change impacts upon the commercial air transport industry: an overview. Carbon Clim Law Rev 10:105–112Google Scholar
- Walsh, J. et al. (2014) Chapter 2: Our changing climate. Third US Natl. Clim. AssessGoogle Scholar
- Williams PD (2016) Transatlantic flight times and climate change. Environ Res Lett 11Google Scholar