Vulnerability of crops and croplands in the US Northern Plains to predicted climate change

  • Brian J. Wienhold
  • Merle F. Vigil
  • John R. Hendrickson
  • Justin D. Derner
Article

Abstract

The states of Colorado, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming comprise the Northern Great Plains region of the USA. The soil and water resources contained in this region have historically supported highly diverse and productive agriculture enterprises that provide a significant proportion of the food, feed, and oilseed for the nation. The region also provides ecological services that influence air, water, and soil quality along with biological diversity. Combined with livestock production and a biofuel industry, crop production forms an integrated system that can offer producers flexibility in management decisions. Projected climatic changes for this region include increasing atmospheric CO2, a longer, warmer growing season, and increased precipitation, likely received in more frequent extreme events. These changes will impact soil and water resources in the region and create opportunities and challenges for land managers. The objectives of this paper are to describe anticipated impacts of projected mid-(2050) and late-(2085) climatic changes on crop production systems in the Northern Great Plains and provide adaptation strategies that should be developed to take advantage of positive and mitigate negative changes. Projected climatic changes will influence agricultural productivity directly as well as indirectly due to changes in weed pressure, insect populations, and diseases. A warmer, longer growing season will change the crops and distribution of those crops grown within the region. An increase in the number of extreme temperature events (high daytime highs or nighttime lows) will decrease crop yields due to increased plant stress during critical pollination and grain fill periods. Adaptation strategies to reduce vulnerability of soil and water resources to projected climatic changes include increasing cropping intensity, reducing tillage intensity, and use of cover crops to provide surface cover to reduce erosion potential and improve nutrient and water use efficiency. Increased use of perennial forages, crop residue, and failed crops in integrated crop-livestock systems will add biological diversity and provide options for converting vegetation biomass into animal protein. Socio-economic changes will need to be incorporated into adaptation strategies planning to insure that sustaining ecosystem services and meeting desired production and conservation goals is accomplished. Education and extension services will be needed to transfer adaptive knowledge in a timely manner to producers in the field.

References

  1. Aguilar J, Gramig GG, Hendrickson JR, Archer DW, Forcella F, Liebig MA (2015) Crop species diversity changes in the United States: 1978–2012. PLoS One 10(8):0136580Google Scholar
  2. Asif J, Yilmaz O, Ozturk O (2016) Elevated carbon dioxide ameliorates the effect of Zn deficiency and terminal drought on wheat grain yield by nutritional quality. Plant Soil. doi:10.1007/s11104-016-2996-9
  3. Bakker MG, Moorman TB, Kaspar TC, Manter DK (2016) Winter rye cover crops as a host for corn seedling pathogens. Am Phytopatho Soc 106:S1.2. doi:10.1094/PHYTO-106-1-s1.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Basche AD, Archontoulis S, Kaspar TC, Jaynes DB, Parkin TB, Miguez F (2016) Simulating long-term impacts of cover crops and climate change on crop production and environmental outcomes in the midwestern United States. Agric Ecosystems Environ 218:95–106. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2015.11.011
  5. Bathke DJ, Oglesby RJ, Rowe CM, Whilhite DA (2014) Understanding and assessing climate change: implications for Nebraska. A synthesis report to support decision making and natural resource management in a changing climate. School of Natural Resources, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources. University of Nebraska – Lincoln, Lincoln, p 73Google Scholar
  6. Bernacchi CJ, ADB L, Heady LE, Morgan PB, Dohleman FG, JM MG, Gillespie KM, Wittig VE, Rogers A, Long SP, Ort DR (2006) Hourly and seasonal variation in photosynthesis and stomatal conductance of soybean grown at future CO2 and ozone concentrations for 3 years under fully open-air field conditions. Plant Cell Environ 29(11):2077–2090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burbach ME, Young AR, Korus JT (2014) The potential impacts of projected changes in climate on groundwater resources in Nebraska. In: Bathke DJ, Oglesby RJ, Rowe CM, Wilhite DA (eds) Understanding and assessing climate change: implications for Nebraska. A synthesis report to support decision making and natural resource management in a changing climate. School of Natural Resources, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources. University of Nebraska – Lincoln, Lincoln, p 40Google Scholar
  8. Cassman KG (1999) Ecological intensification of cereal production systems. Yield potential, soil quality, and precision agriculture. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 96:5952–5959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheng L, Booker FL, Burkey KO, Tu C, Shew HD, Rufty TW, Fiscus EL, Deforest JL, Hu S (2011) Soil microbial responses to elevated CO2 and O3 in a nitrogen-aggrading agroecosystem. PLoS One 6(6):e21377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coakley SM, Sherm H, Chakraborty S (1999) Climate change and plant disease management. Annu Rev Phytopathol 37:399–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology (CAST) (2017) Crop production contributions toward agricultural productivity: the need for agricultural innovation to sustainably feed the world by 2050. Issue Paper 58. CAST, AmesGoogle Scholar
  12. Culman SW, Snapp SS, Ollenburger M, Basso B, LR DH (2013) Soil and water quality rapidly responds to perennial grain Kernza wheatgrass. Agron J 105:735–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diffenbaugh NS, Krupke CH, White MA, Alexander CE (2008) Global warming presents new challenges for maize pest management. Environ Res Letters 4:044007Google Scholar
  14. Doran JW, Mielke LN, Power JF (1990) Microbial activity as regulated by soil water-filled pore space. In: Transactions of the 14th International Congress of Soil Science, Kyoto, Japan. International Soil Science Society, Wageningen, pp 94–100Google Scholar
  15. Elmqvist T, Folke C, Nyström M, Peterson G, Bengtsson J, Walker B, Norberg J (2003) Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience. Front Ecol Environ 1:488–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Erbs M, Manderscheid R, Jansen G, Seddig S, Pacholski A, Weigel H-J (2010) Effects of free-air CO2 enrichment and nitrogen supply on grain quality parameters and elemental composition of wheat and barley grown in crop rotation. Agric Ecosyst Environ 136:59–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ferris R, Ellis RH, Wheeler TR, Hadley P (1998) Effect of high temperature stress at anthesis on grain yield and biomass of field-grown crops of wheat. Ann Bot 82(5):631–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Halvorson AD, Black AL (1974) Saline seep development in dryland soils of north-eastern Montana. J Soil Water Conserv 29:77–81Google Scholar
  19. Hatfield JL (2006) Multifunctionality of agriculture and farming system design: perspectives from the United States. Bibliotecha Fragmenta Agronomica 11:43–52Google Scholar
  20. Hayes BJ, Lewin HA, Goddard ME (2013) The future of livestock breeding: genomic selection for efficiency, reduced emissions intensity, and adaptation. Trends Genet 29:206–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hendrickson JR, Hanson JD, Tanaka DL, Sassenrath G (2008a) Principles of integrated agricultural systems: introduction to processes and definition. Renew Agric Food Syst 23(04):265–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hendrickson JR, Liebig MA, Sassenrath GF (2008b) Environment and integrated agricultural systems. Renew Agric Food Syst 23:304–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kaspar TC, Singer JW (2011) The use of cover crops to manage soil. In: Hatfield JL, Sauer TJ (eds) Soil management: building a Stable Base for agriculture. American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 321–337Google Scholar
  24. Kasper TC, Colvin TS, Jaynes B, Karlen DL, James DE, Meek DW (2003) Relationship between six years of corn yields and terrain attributes. Precis Agric 4:87–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kitchen NR, Sudduth KA, Drummond ST, Scharf PC, Palm HL, Robert DF, Vories ED (2010) Ground-based canopy reflectance sensing for variable-rate nitrogen corn fertilization. Agron J 102:71–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lauenroth WK, Burke IC, Gutmann MP (1999) The structure and function of ecosystems in the central north American grassland region. Great Plains Res 9:223–259Google Scholar
  27. Lemaire G, Franzluebbers A, de Faccio Carvalho PC, Dedieu B (2014) Integrated crop–livestock systems: strategies to achieve synergy between agricultural production and environmental quality. Agric Ecosyst Environ 190:4–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liska A, Holley E (2014) Climate change and its implications for the insurance industry. In: Bathke DJ, Oglesby RJ, Rowe CM et al (eds) Understanding and assessing climate change: implications for Nebraska. A synthesis report to support decision making and natural resource management in a changing climate. School of Natural Resources, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources. University of Nebraska – Lincoln, Lincoln, pp 59–60Google Scholar
  29. Liu J, Xie X, Du J, Sun J, Bai X (2008) Effects of simultaneous drought and heat stress on Kentucky bluegrass. Sci Hortic 115(2):190–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lobell DB, Field CB (2007) Global scale climate–crop yield relationships and the impacts of recent warming. Environ Res Lett 2(1):014002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lobell DB, Lesch SM, Corwin DL, Ulmer MG, Anderson KA, Potts DJ, Doolittle JA, Baltes MJ (2009) Regional-scale assessment of soil salinity in the Red River Valley using multi-year MODIS EVI and NDVI. J Environ Qual 39:35–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lubofsky E (2016) The promise of perennials. CSA News, November 2016 pp 4–7Google Scholar
  33. May RM, Dobson AP (1986) Population dynamics and the rate of evolution of pesticide resistance, in pesticide resistance: strategies and tactics for management. National Research Council Committee on Strategies for the Management of Pesticide Resistant Pest Populations, National Academy Press, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  34. McBratney A, Whelan B, Ancev T (2005) Future directions of precision agriculture. Precis Agric 6:7–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moore EB, Kaspar TC, Wiedenhoeft MH, Cambardella CA (2014) Rye cover crop effects on soil quality in no-till silage-soybean cropping systems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 78:968–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nielsen DC, Lyon DJ, Higgens RK, Hergert GW, Holman JD, Vigil MF (2015) Cover crop effect on subsequent wheat yield in the central Great Plains. Agron J 108:243–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nielsen DC, Vigil MF, Hansen NC (2016) Evaluating potential dryland cropping systems adapted to climate change in the central Great Plains. Agron J 108:2391–2405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. North Dakota State Water Commission (2015) Trends in North Dakota field water management. The Oxbow, April 2015, pp 16–18Google Scholar
  39. Patterson DT, Westbrook JK, Joyce RJV, Lingren PD, Rogasik J (1999) Weeds, insects, and diseases. Clim Chang 43(4):711–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pierce DW, Cayan DR, Thrasher BL (2014) Statistical downscaling using localized constructed analogs (LOCA). J Hydrometeorol 15:2558–2585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pierce DW, Cayan DR, Maurer EP, Abatzoglou JT, Hegewisch KC (2015) Improved bias correction techniques for hydrological simulations of climate change. J Hydrometeorol 16:2421–2442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Power AG (2010) Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies. Philos Trans the R Soc B Biol Sci 365(1554):2959–2971Google Scholar
  43. Rahman A, Wardle D (1990) Effects of climate change on cropping weeds in New Zealand. In: Prestidge RA, Pottinger RP (eds) The impact of climate change on pests, diseases, weeds and beneficial organisms present in New Zealand agricultural and horticultural systems. Ruakura Agricultural Centre, Hamilton, pp 107–112Google Scholar
  44. Rathje G-W, Wienhold BJ, Wilhelm WW, Diepenbrock W (2007) Tillage and rotation effect on corn-soybean energy balances in eastern Nebraska. Soil Tillage Res 97:60–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schiere JB, Ibrahim MNM, Van Keulen H (2002) The role of livestock for sustainability in mixed farming: criteria and scenario studies under varying resource allocation. Agric Ecosyst Environ 90(2):139–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schimmelpfennig D (2016) Farm profits and adoption of precision agriculture. ERR-217, US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, October 2016Google Scholar
  47. Schneider JC (2014) Implications of a changing climate for Nebraska’s water resources and its management. In: Bathke DJ, Oglesby RJ, Wilhite DA (eds) Understanding and assessing climate change: implications for Nebraska. A synthesis report to support decision making and natural resource management in a changing climate. School of Natural Resources, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources. University of Nebraska – Lincoln, Lincoln, p 42Google Scholar
  48. Shafer M, Ojima D, Antle JM, Kluck D, McPherson RA, Petersen S, Scanlon B, Sherman K (2014) Ch. 19: Great Plains. Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment. In: Melillo JM, Richmond TTC, Yohe GW (eds) U.S. Global Change Research Program, pp 441–461, Doi:10.7930/JOD798BC
  49. Soil and Water Conservation Society (2003) Soil erosion and runoff from cropland report from the USA. Soil and Water Conservation Society, Ankeny, p 63Google Scholar
  50. Springer G, Wienhold BJ, Richardson JL, Disrud LA (1999) Salinity and sodicity induced changes in dispersible clay and saturated hydraulic conductivity is sulfatic soils. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 30:2211–2220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sulc RM, Franzluebbers AJ (2014) Exploring integrated crop–livestock systems in different ecoregions of the United States. Eur J Agron 57:21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sulc RM, Tracy BF (2007) Integrated crop–livestock systems in the US Corn Belt. Agron J 99(2):335–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Unger PW, Baumhardt RL (1999) Factors related to dryland grain sorghum yield increases: 1939 through 1997. Agron J 91:870–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. USDA-NASS (2013) Farm and ranch irrigation survey. 2012 Census of Agriculture. National Agricultural Statistics Service. US Department of AgricultureGoogle Scholar
  55. USDA-NASS (2016a) Crop Production 2015 Summary. U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistic Service, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  56. USDA-NASS (2016b) Crop Values 2015 Summary. U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistic Service, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  57. Vigil MF, Nielsen DC (1997) Winter wheat yield depression from legume green fallow. Agron J 90:727–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Walsh J, Wuebbles K, Hayhoe K, Kossin J, Kunkel K, Stephens G, Thorne P, et al., (2014) Ch. 2: our changing climate. Climate change impacts in the United States: the third national climate assessment. In: Melillo JM, Richmond TTC, Yohe GW (eds) U.S. Global Change Research Program, pp 19–67. doi:10.7930/J0KW5CXT
  59. Walther G-R (2010) Community and ecosystem responses to recent climate change. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 365(1549):2019–2024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wienhold BJ, Schmer MR, Jin VL, Varvel GE, Gollany H (2015) CQESTR simulated changes in soil organic carbon under residue removal practices in continuous corn systems. Bioenergy Res 9:23–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wright CK, Wimberly MC (2013) Recent land use change in the Western Corn Belt threatens grassland and wetlands. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:4134–4139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zhang Y-G, Hernandez M, Anson E, Nearing MA, Wei H, Stone JJ, Heilman P (2012) Modeling climate change effects on runoff and soil erosion in southeastern Arizona rangelands and implications for mitigation with rangeland conservation practices. J Soil Water Conserv 67(5):390–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zipper SC, Qiu J, Kucharik CJ (2016) Drought effects on US maize and soybean production: spatiotemporal patterns and historical changes. Environ Res Lett 11(9):094021CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht (outside the USA) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.USDA-ARS, 251 Filley Hall/Food Ind. Complex, East CampusUniversity of Nebraska—LincolnLincolnUSA
  2. 2.USDA-ARSAkronUSA
  3. 3.USDA-ARSMandanUSA
  4. 4.USDA-ARSCheyenneUSA

Personalised recommendations