Advertisement

Climatic Change

, Volume 143, Issue 1–2, pp 227–241 | Cite as

When do extreme weather events generate attention to climate change?

  • Matthew R. Sisco
  • Valentina Bosetti
  • Elke U. Weber
Article

Abstract

We analyzed the effects of 10,748 weather events on attention to climate change between December 2011 and November 2014 in local areas across the USA. Attention was gauged by quantifying the relative increase in Twitter messages about climate change in the local area around the time of each event. Coastal floods, droughts, wildfires, strong wind, hail, excessive heat, extreme cold, and heavy snow events all had detectable effects. Attention was reliably higher directly after events began, compared to directly before. Financial damage associated with the weather events had a positive and significant effect on attention, although the effect was small. The abnormality of each weather event’s occurrence compared to local historical activity was also a significant predictor. In particular and in line with past research, relative abnormalities in temperature (local warming) generated attention to climate change. In contrast, wind speed was predictive of attention to climate change in absolute levels. These results can be useful to predict short-term attention to climate change for strategic climate communications and to better forecast long-term climate policy support.

Keywords

Climate attention Social media Extreme weather 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research leading to these results received funding from the European Research Council under the European Community’s Programme “Ideas”—Call identifier: ERC-2013-StG/ERC grant agreement no. 336703—project RISICO “Risk and uncertainty in developing and implementing climate change policies.” Funding was also provided under the cooperative agreement NSF SES-0951516 awarded to the Center for Research on Environmental Decisions. Funding and training for the first author was also provided by the From Data to Solutions IGERT program NSF-1144854. We thank Andrei Kirilenko for helping us access additional public Twitter messages in our time range.

Supplementary material

10584_2017_1984_MOESM1_ESM.docx (819 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 818 kb)
10584_2017_1984_MOESM2_ESM.html (668 kb)
ESM 2 (HTML 667 kb)
10584_2017_1984_MOESM3_ESM.html (720 kb)
ESM 3 (HTML 719 kb)
10584_2017_1984_MOESM4_ESM.html (751 kb)
ESM 4 (HTML 751 kb)
10584_2017_1984_MOESM5_ESM.html (728 kb)
ESM 5 (HTML 727 kb)

References

  1. Arcury TA, Christianson EH (1990) Environmental worldview in response to environmental problems Kentucky 1984 and 1988 compared. Environ Behav 22(3):387–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67(1):1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brody SD, Zahran S, Vedlitz A, Grover H (2008) Examining the relationship between physical vulnerability and public perceptions of global climate change in the United States. Environ Behav 40(1):72–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brulle R J, Carmichael J, Jenkins JC (2012) Shifting public opinion on climate change: an empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the U.S., 2002–2010. Climatic Change 114(2):169–188. doi: 10.1007/s10584-012-0403-y
  5. Capstick SB, Pidgeon NF (2014) Public perception of cold weather events as evidence for and against climate change. Clim Chang 122(4):695–708Google Scholar
  6. Cutler MJ (2016) Class, ideology, and severe weather: how the interaction of social and physical factors shape climate change threat perceptions among coastal US residents. Environmental Sociology (2)3:275-285. doi: 10.1080/23251042.2016.1210842
  7. Egan PJ, Mullin M (2012) Turning personal experience into political attitudes: the effect of local weather on Americans’ perceptions about global warming. The Journal of Politics 74(03):796–809. doi: 10.1017/S0022381612000448 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Egan PJ, Mullin M (2016) Recent improvement and projected worsening of weather in the United States. Nature 532(7599):357–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goebbert K, Jenkins-Smith HC, Klockow K, Nowlin MC, Silva CL (2012) Weather, climate, and worldviews: the sources and consequences of public perceptions of changes in local weather patterns*. Weather, Climate, and Society 4:132–144. doi: 10.1175/WCAS-D-11-00044.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Graham M, Hale SA, Gaffney D (2014) Where in the world are you? Geolocation and language identification in Twitter. Prof Geogr 66(4):568–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hamilton LC, Stampone MD (2013) Blowin’ in the wind: short-term weather and belief in anthropogenic climate change. Weather, Climate, and Society 5(2):112–119. doi: 10.1175/WCAS-D-12-00048.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Howe PD, Leiserowitz A (2013) Who remembers a hot summer or a cold winter? The asymmetric effect of beliefs about global warming on perceptions of local climate conditions in the U.S. Glob Environ Chang 23(6):1488–1500. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.09.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Joireman J, Barnes Truelove H, Duell B (2010) Effect of outdoor temperature, heat primes and anchoring on belief in global warming. J Environ Psychol 30(4):358–367. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kirilenko AP, Molodtsova T, Stepchenkova SO (2015) People as sensors: mass media and local temperature influence climate change discussion on Twitter. Glob Environ Chang 30:92–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Konisky DM, Hughes L, Kaylor CH (2015) Extreme weather events and climate change concern. Clim Chang. doi: 10.1007/s10584-015-1555-3 Google Scholar
  16. Lang C (2014) Do weather fluctuations cause people to seek information about climate change? Clim Chang 125(3–4):291–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lang C, Ryder JD (2016) The effect of tropical cyclones on climate change engagement. Clim Chang 135(3):625–638. doi: 10.1007/s10584-015-1590-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li Y, Johnson EJ, Zaval L (2011) Local warming: daily temperature change influences belief in global warming. Psychol Sci 22:454–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Myers TA, Maibach EW, Roser-Renouf C, Akerlof K, Leiserowitz AA (2013) The relationship between personal experience and belief in the reality of global warming. Nat Clim Chang 3(4):343–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. National weather service (2007) National weather service instruction—storm data preparation. Retrieved from: https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/pd01016005curr.pdf
  21. Ricke KL, Caldeira K (2014) Natural climate variability and future climate policy. Nat Clim Chang 4(5):333–338. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2186 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rudman LA, McLean MC, Bunzl M (2013) When truth is personally inconvenient, attitudes change: the impact of extreme weather on implicit support for green politicians and explicit climate-change beliefs. Psychol Sci 24(11):2290–2296. doi: 10.1177/0956797613492775 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Spence A, Poortinga W, Butler C, Pidgeon NF (2011) Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience. Nat Clim Chang 1(4):46–49. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1059 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Weber EH (1978) The sense of touch. Academic Pr, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Weber EU (2004) Perception matters: psychophysics for economists. In: Carrillo J, Brocas I (eds) Psychology and economics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 165–176Google Scholar
  26. Weber EU (2013) Psychology: seeing is believing. Nat Clim Chang 3(4):312–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Weber EU, Sonka S (1994) Production and pricing decisions in cash-crop farming: effects of decision traits and climate change expectations. In: Jacobsen BH, Pedersen DF, Christensen J, Rasmussen S (eds) Farmers’ decision making: a descriptive approach. European Association of Agricultural Economists, Copenhagen, pp 203–218Google Scholar
  28. Whitmarsh L (2016) Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioural response. Journal of Risk Research 11(3):351–374. doi: 10.1080/13669870701552235
  29. Wilcox RR 2014 Winsorized robust measures. Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference OnlineGoogle Scholar
  30. Zaval L, Keenan EA, Johnson EJ, Weber EU (2014) How warm days increase belief in global warming. Nat Clim Chang 4(2):143–147. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2093 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew R. Sisco
    • 1
  • Valentina Bosetti
    • 2
    • 3
  • Elke U. Weber
    • 4
  1. 1.Center for Research on Environmental DecisionsColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Bocconi UniversityMilanItaly
  3. 3.Fondazione Eni Enrico MatteiPalazzo delle StellineMilanItaly
  4. 4.Andlinger Center for Energy and the EnvironmentPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations