Climatic Change

, Volume 142, Issue 3–4, pp 311–320 | Cite as

A case for further refinement of the Green Climate Fund’s 50:50 ratio climate change mitigation and adaptation allocation framework: toward a more targeted approach

Essay

Abstract

Created in 2010 and made operational in 2015, the Green Climate Fund (GCF) is expected to become the main mechanism for transferring public and some private funds to non-Annex I countries to address climate change. It aims to achieve a 50:50 balance between adaptation and mitigation financing over time. While there is a diplomatic history leading to this arrangement, we argue the GCF’s allocation strategy requires further refinement if it is to adequately address climate change. We advocate prioritizing climate mitigation over adaptation in funding while not ignoring climate justice concerns all together. We recommend a more targeted approach to its funding allocations based upon the GHGs abatement potential for mitigation or climate vulnerability for adaptation of very specific non-Annex I countries. We believe these refinements will help to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of scarce climate change financing resources required to achieve the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) central objective of no more than 1.5 °C by 2100, which requires emissions reductions between 70 and 95% (2010 levels) by 2050.

Supplementary material

10584_2017_1938_MOESM1_ESM.docx (36 kb)
ESM 1(DOCX 35 kb)

References

  1. Adger W, Dessai S, Goulden M et al (2009) Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Clim Chang 93(3–4):335–354. doi:10.1007/s10584-008-9520z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anguelovski I, Chu E, Carmin J (2014) Variations in approaches to urban climate adaptation: experiences and experimentation from the global south. Glob Environ Chang 27:156–167. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.05.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brechin SR (2016) Climate change mitigation and the collective action problem: exploring country differences in greenhouse gas contributions. Sociol Forum. doi:10.1111/socf.12276 Google Scholar
  4. Buchner B, Herve-Mognucci M, Trabacchi C et al. (2013) The global landscape of climate finance. https://climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/The-Global-Landscape-of-Climate-Finance-2013.pdf
  5. Buchner B, Trabacchi C, Mazza F et al. (2015) The global landscape of climate finance. http://climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Global-Landscape-of-Climate-Finance-2015.pdf
  6. Buckley T, Sanzillo T (2015) Past peak coal in China. http://ieefa.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/IEEFA_Peak-Coal_November-2015.pdf
  7. Cassidy J (2015) A skeptical note on the Paris climate deal. New Yorker. http://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/skeptical-note-paris-climate-deal
  8. Chambwera M, Heal G, Dubeux C et al (2014) Economics of adaptation. In: Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 945–777Google Scholar
  9. Ciplet D, Roberts JT, Khan M (2013) The politics of international climate adaptation funding: justice and divisions in the greenhouse. Global Environ Polit 13(1):49–68. doi:10.1162/GLEP_a_00153 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cui L, Zhu L, Springmann M et al (2014) J Syst Sci Syst Eng 23:266. doi:10.1007/s11518-014-5250-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ekanaye P, Moriarty P, Honnery D (2015) Equity and energy in global solutions to climate change. Energy Sustain Dev 26:72–78. doi:10.1016/j.esd.2015.03.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Evans LS, Hicks CC, Adger WN et al (2016) Structural and psycho-social limits to climate change adaptation in the great barrier reef region. PLoS ONE 11(3):1–17. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0150575 Google Scholar
  13. Flåm KH, Skjærseth JB (2009) Does adequate financing exist for adaptation in developing countries? Clim Pol 9(1):109–114. doi:10.3763/cpol.2008.0568 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Green Climate Fund (2011) Governing instrument for the Green Climate Fund. https://www.greenclimate.fund/documents/20182/56440/Governing_Instrument.pdf/caa6ce45-cd54-4ab0-9e37-fb637a9c6235
  15. Green Climate Fund (2015a) Further development of the initial investment framework: sub-criteria and methodology. GCF/B.09/07. https://www.greenclimate.fund/documents/20182/24949/GCF_B.09_07_-_Further_Development_of_the_Initial_Investment_Framework__Sub-Criteria_and_Methodology.pdf/18db33f8-a55b-488f-8a6b-5df68f39a137
  16. Green Climate Fund (2015b) Green Climate Fund approves first 8 investments—News Web site. http://www.greenclimate.fund/-/green-climate-fund-approves-first-8-investmen-1
  17. Green Climate Fund (2016b) Status of pledges and contributions made to the Green Climate Fund. Status date: 07 Dec 2016. https://www.greenclimate.fund/documents/20182/24868/Status_of_Pledges.pdf/eef538d3-2987-4659-8c7c-5566ed6afd19
  18. Green Climate Fund (2016c) Enhancing direct access to international climate finance. Conference presentation by Dr. Binu Parthan [Video file] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KI-v9qOu2OE&t=398s
  19. Guillaumont P (2015) Measuring vulnerability to climate change for allocating funds to adaptation. In Barret S, Carraro C, de Melo J (eds) Towards a workable and effective climate regime. CEPR Press, p 515–533. http://voxeu.org/content/towards-workable-and-effective-climate-regime
  20. Herve-Mignucci M, Wang X (2015) Slowing the growth of coal power outside China: a Climate Policy Initiative (CPI) report. https://climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Slowing-the-Growth-of-Coal-Power-Outside-China.pdf
  21. International Energy Agency (IEA) (2016) World Energy Outlook 2016: executive summary. https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/WorldEnergyOutlook2016ExecutiveSummaryEnglish.pdf
  22. IPCC (2014) In: Core Writing Team, Pachauri RK, Meyer LA (eds) Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  23. IPCC et al (2014) Summary for policymakers. In: Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y (eds) Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Kane S, Shogren J (2000) Linking adaptation and mitigation in climate change policy. Clim Chang 45(1):75–102. doi:10.1023/A:1005688900676 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Khan MR, Roberts JT (2013) Adaptation and international climate policy. WIREs Clim Change 4(3):171–189. doi:10.1002/wcc.212 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Klein RTJ, Midgley GF, Preston BL et al (2014) Adaptation opportunities, constraints, and limits. In: Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 899–943Google Scholar
  27. Le Page M (2015) Paris climate deal is agreed—but is it really good enough? New Scientist https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn28663-paris-climate-deal-is-agreed-but-is-it-really-good-enough/
  28. Michaelowa A, Michaelowa K (2015) Do rapidly developing countries take up new responsibilities for climate change mitigation. Clim Chang 133:499–510. doi:10.1007/s10584-015-1528-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Millner A, Dietz S (2014) Adaptation to climate change and economic growth in developing countries. Environ Dev Econ 20:380–406. doi:10.1017/S1355770X14000692 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Müller B (2014) Performance-based formulaic resource allocation—a cautionary tale: some lessons for the green climate fund from multilateral funding. Oxford Energy and Environment StudiesGoogle Scholar
  31. Nakhooda S, Norman M, Barnard S et al. (2014). Climate finance: is it making a difference? A review of the effectiveness of multilateral climate funds. Executive Summary. https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/9358.pdf
  32. Parikh J, Baruah L (2012) A new framework for the UNFCCC. Common but differentiated responsibilities among non-Annex I countries. Economic & Political Weekly XLVII (45). https://irade.org/A_New_Framework_for_the_UNFCCC.pdf
  33. Pauw P, Bauer S, Richerzhagen C et al. (2014). Different perspective on differentiated responsibilities. A state-of-the-art review of the notion of common but differentiated responsibilities in international negotiations. https://www.die-gdi.de/uploads/media/DP_6.2014.pdf
  34. Peskett L, Grist N, Hedger M, Lennartz-Walker T, Scholz I (2009) Climate change challenges for EU development co-operation: emerging issues. European development co-operation to 2020 working paper no. 3, European association of development research and training institutes (EADI), Bonn, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  35. Preston B, Dow K, Berkhout F (2013) The climate adaptation frontier. Sustainability 5(3):1011–1035. doi:10.3390/su5031011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Watkiss P, Benzie M, Klein RJT (2015) The complementarity and comparability of climate change adaptation and mitigation. WIREs Clim Change 6(6):541–557. doi:10.1002/wcc.368 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wolosin M, Breitfeller J, Schaap B (2016) The geography of REDD+ finance: deforestation, emissions, and the targeting of forest conservation finance. http://www.forest-trends.org/documents/files/doc_5334.pdf
  38. WRI, CAIT (2014) Climate analysis indicators tool: WRI’s climate data explorer. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC. http://cait2.wri.org

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rutgers The State University of New JerseyNew BrunswickUSA

Personalised recommendations