Climatic Change

, Volume 141, Issue 4, pp 599–612 | Cite as

The great divide: understanding the role of media and other drivers of the partisan divide in public concern over climate change in the USA, 2001–2014

  • Jason T. CarmichaelEmail author
  • Robert J. Brulle
  • Joanna K. Huxster


Recent scholarship has identified a large and growing divide on how Republicans and Democrats view the issue of climate change. A number of these studies have suggested that this polarization is a product of systematic efforts to spread doubt about the reality of climate change through the media in general and conservative media in particular. However, research to date has largely relied on speculation about such a relationship rather than empirical evidence. We improve on existing research by conducting an empirical analysis of the factors affecting national-level, quarterly shifts in public concern about climate change between January 2001 and December 2014. Our analysis focuses on the potential role played by four factors that should account for changes in levels of concern regarding climate change: (1) media coverage, (2) extreme weather, (3) issuance of major scientific reports, and (4) changes in economic activity and foreign conflict. Some results suggest that partisan media influences beliefs in ways expected by communication scholars who describe “echo chamber” effects and “boomerang” effects. Among other supporting evidence, we find that partisan media not only strengthen views of like-minded audiences but also when Republicans are presented with opposing frames about climate change from liberal media, they appear to reject the messages such that they are less concerned about the issue. Findings also demonstrate that the dissemination of science increases concern about climate change among Democrats but has no influence on Republicans. Finally, extreme weather does not increase concern among Democrats or Republicans. Implications for future research are discussed.


Climate Change Public Opinion Political Party Media Coverage Public Concern 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Supplementary material

10584_2017_1908_MOESM1_ESM.docx (295 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 295 kb)


  1. Bauer M, Allum N, Miller S (2007) What can we learn from 25-years of PUS research? Liberating and expanding the agenda. Public Underst Sci 16:79–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Birkland TA (2006) Lessons of disaster: policy change after catastrophic events. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Brewer PR, McKnight J (2015) Climate as comedy the effects of satirical television news on climate change perceptions. Sci Commun 37(5):635–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brulle RJ, Carmichael JT, Jenkins JC (2012) Climate change and public concern: 2002–2010. Clim Chang 114:169–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Capstick S, Whitmarsh L et al (2015) International trends in public perceptions of climate change over the past quarter century. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 1:35–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cook J, Nuccitelli D, Green SA, Richardson M, Winkler B, Painting R, Way R, Jacobs P, Skuce A (2013) Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environ Res Lett 8: 1-7Google Scholar
  7. Dumitrescu D, Mughan A (2010) Mass Media and Democratic Politics. In: Leicht K, Jenkins JC (eds) The handbook of politics: state and civil society. Global Perspective Springer Publishers, New York, pp 477–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dunlap RE (2013) Climate change skepticism and denial: an introduction. Am Behav Sci 57:691–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dunlap RE, McCright AM (2011) Organized climate change denial. In: Dryzek J, Norgaard R, Schlosberg D (eds) Oxford handbook of climate change and society. Oxford Press, Cambridge, pp 144–160Google Scholar
  10. Dunlap RE, McCright AM, Yarosh JH (2016) The political divide on climate change: partisan polarization widens in the U.S. Environ: Sci Policy Sustain Dev 58:4–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Feldman LP, Hart PS, Milosevic T (2015) Polarizing news? Representations of threat and efficacy in leading U.S. newspapers’ coverage of climate change. Public Understand Sci 1–17Google Scholar
  12. Gelpi C, Feaver P, Reifler J (2009) Paying the human costs of war: american public opinion and casualties in military conflicts. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guber DL (2013) A cooling climate for change? Party polarization and the politics of global warming. Am Behav Sci 57(1):93–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gunther AC, Schmitt K (2004) Mapping boundaries of the hostile media effect. Journal of Communication 54:55–70Google Scholar
  15. Hamilton LC, Stampone M (2013) Blowin' in the wind: short-term weather and belief in anthropogenic climate change. Weather, Climate, and Society 5:112–119Google Scholar
  16. Hmielowski JD, Feldman L, Myers TA, Leiserowitz A, Maibach E (2014) An attack on science? Media use, trust in scientists, and perceptions of global warming. Public Underst Sci 23(7):866–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jamieson KH, Cappella JN (2008) Echo chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the conservative media establishment. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  18. Kahn ME, Kotchen MJ (2010) Environmental concern and the business cycle: the chilling effect of recessions. NBER working paper series. Cambridge, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Konisky D, Hughes L, Kaylor C (2016) Extreme weather events and climate change concern. Clim Chang 134:533–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, Smith N (2010) Climate change in the American Mind: Americans’ global warming beliefs and attitudes in June 2010. Yale University and George Mason UniversityGoogle Scholar
  21. Marquart-Pyatt ST, Shwom RL, Dietz T et al (2011) Understanding public opinion on climate change: a call for research. Environment 53(4):38–42Google Scholar
  22. Marquart-Pyatt ST, McCright A, Dietz T, Dunlap R (2014) Politics eclipses climate extremes for climate change perceptions. Glob Environ Chang 29:246–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McCright A, Dunlap R (2011) The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. Sociol Quart 52(2):155–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McCright AM, Dunlap RE, Xiao C (2014) Increasing influence of party identification on percieved agreement and support for government action on climate change in the United States, 2006–12. Weather, Climate, and Society 6:194–201Google Scholar
  25. Mcknight D (2010) A change in the climate? The journalism of opinion at News Corporation. Journalism 11(6):693–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Scruggs L, Bengal S (2012) Declining public concern about climate change: can we blame the great recession? Glob Environ Chang 22:505–515Google Scholar
  27. Sellers P (2010) Cycles of Spin: Strategic Communication in the U.S. Congress. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  28. Shao W, Keim BD, Garand JC, Hamilton LC (2014) Weather, climate, and the economy: explaining risk perceptions of global warming. Weather Clim Soc 6:119–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shove E (2010) Beyond the ABC: climate change policy and theories of social change. Environ Plan 42:1273–1285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shwom RL, McCright AM, Berchin SR (2015) Public opinion on climate change. In: Dunlap RE, Brulle RJ (eds) Climate change and society: sociological perspectives. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 269-299Google Scholar
  31. Spence A, Poortinga W, Butler C, Pidgeon N (2011) Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience. Nat Clim Chang 1:46–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stoknes PE (2014) Rethinking climate communications and the “psychological climate paradox”. Energ Res Soc Sci 1:161–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stroud NJ (2011) Niche news: the politics of news choice. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  34. Weber E, Stern P (2011) Public understanding of climate change in the United States. Am Psychol 66(4):315–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wolfe M, Jones BD, Baumgartner FR (2013) A Failure to communicate: agenda setting in media and policy studies. Political Communication 30:175–192Google Scholar
  36. Zaller JR (1992) The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhao X, Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C (2011) Attention to science/environment news positively predicts and attention to political news negatively predicts global warming risk perceptions and policy support. J Commun 61:713–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhou J (2016) Boomerang versus javelins: how polarization constrains communication on climate change. Environ Politics 25:788–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Department of SociologyDrexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  3. 3.Bucknell UniversityLewisburgUSA

Personalised recommendations