Climatic Change

, Volume 139, Issue 3–4, pp 429–443 | Cite as

Adaptation and Indigenous peoples in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

  • James Ford
  • Michelle Maillet
  • Vincent Pouliot
  • Thomas Meredith
  • Alicia Cavanaugh
  • IHACC Research Team


Indigenous peoples are uniquely sensitive to climate change impacts yet have been overlooked in climate policy, including within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). We identify and characterize the discourse around adaptation in the UNFCCC, examining implications for Indigenous peoples based on a critical discourse analysis of the original Convention and decision texts from subsequent Conference of the Parties (CP). CP16 in Cancun (2010) was a critical juncture after which adaptation emerged as a central component of climate policy in the Convention, with a shift from a purely scientific approach to adaptation to one where local, Indigenous, and traditional knowledge are also valued. Since CP16, the discursive space for incorporating the voices, needs, and priorities of Indigenous peoples around adaptation has expanded, reflected in decision texts and engagement with Indigenous issues in the work streams of relevant bodies. We outline opportunities for greater engagement of Indigenous issues in the UNFCCC post-Paris Agreement, noting the underlying State-centric nature of the Convention limits what can ultimately be achieved.


Indigenous People Climate Policy Indigenous Knowledge Critical Discourse Analysis Discursive Space 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This work was carried out with support from the International Development Research Centre, the Canadian Institute of Health Research, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

The authors thank Kirstie Booth for her help with figure design, colleagues on the Indigenous Health Adaptation to Climate Change project ( for their continued support, and the three anonymous reviewers for their contributions to improve this paper.

IHACC Research Team

Lea Berrang-Ford, McGill University

Sherilee Harper, University of Guelph

Shuaib Lwasa, Makerere University

Didacus Namanya, Ugandan Ministry of Health

Alejandro Llanos, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (UPCH)

Cesar Carcamo, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (UPCH)

Supplementary material

10584_2016_1820_MOESM1_ESM.docx (133 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 133 kb)


  1. Antonova AS (2016) The rhetoric of “responsible fishing”: notions of human rights and sustainability in the European Union’s bilateral fishing agreements with developing states. Mar Policy 70:77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayers J, Alam M, Huq S (2010) Global adaptation governance beyond 2012: developing country perspectives. In: Biermann F, Pattberg P, Zelli F (eds) Global climate governance beyond 2012: architecture, agency and adaptation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnett M, Finnemore M (2004) Rules for the world: international organizations in global politics. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  4. Betsill M, Dubash NK, Paterson M, van Asselt H, Vihma A, Winkler H (2015) Building productive links between the UNFCCC and the broader global climate governance landscape. Glob Environ Polit 15:1–10Google Scholar
  5. Betzold C, Flesken A (2014) Indigenous peoples in international environmental negotiations: evidence from biodiversity and climate change. In: Kaime T (ed) International climate change law and policy: cultural legitimacy in adaptation and mitigation. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Biermann F, Gupta A (2011) Accountability and legitimacy in earth system governance: a research framework. Ecol Econ 70:1856–1864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brugnach M, Craps M, Dewulf A (2014) Including Indigenous peoples in climate change mitigation: addressing issues of scale, knowledge and power. Clim Chang. doi: 10.1007/s10584-014-1280-3
  8. Cole DH (2015) Advantages of a polycentric approach to climate change policy. Nat Clim Chang 5:114–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. CTKW (2014) Guidelines for considering traditional knowledges in climate change initiatives. The climate and traditional knowledges workgroup
  10. Dryzek JS (2005) The politics of the earth: environmental discourses. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Eckersley R (2012) Moving forward in the climate negotiations: multilateralism or minilateralism? Glob Environ Polit 12:24–42Google Scholar
  12. Fairclough N (2013) Critical discourse analysis: the critical study of language. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Ford JD (2009) Dangerous climate change and the importance of adaptation for the Arctic’s Inuit population. Environ Res Lett 4(2):1–9Google Scholar
  14. Ford J (2012) Indigenous health and climate change. Am J Public Health 102:1260–1266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ford JD et al (2016) Including Indigenous knowledge and experience in IPCC assessment reports. Nat Clim Chang 6(4):349–353Google Scholar
  16. Foucault M (1982) The subject of power. Crit Inq 8:777–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gampfer R, Bernauer T, Kachi A (2014) Obtaining public support for north–south climate funding: evidence from conjoint experiments in donor countries. Glob Environ Chang 29:118–126Google Scholar
  18. Gehring T, Faude B (2013) The dynamics of regime complexes: microfoundations and systemic effects. Glob Gov 19:119–130Google Scholar
  19. Gupta J (2010) A history of international climate change policy. WIREs Clim Chang 1:636–653Google Scholar
  20. Haas PM (2002) UN conferences and constructivist governance of the environment. Glob Gov 8:73–91Google Scholar
  21. Hansen L (2006) Security as practice: discourse analysis and the Bosnian war. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Working Group II contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Jordan A, Huitema D, Hilden M, van Asselt H, Rayner T, Schoenefeld J, Tosun J, Forster J, Boasson E (2015) Emergence of polycentric climate governance and its future prospects. Nat Clim Chang 5:977–982Google Scholar
  24. Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen SI, McGee J (2013) Legitimacy in an era of fragmentation: the case of global climate governance. Glob Environ Polit 13(3):56–78Google Scholar
  25. Keohane RO, Victor DG (2011) The regime complex for climate change. Perspect Polit 9:7–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Khan MR, Roberts JT (2013) Adaptation and international climate policy. WIREs Clim Chang 4:171–189Google Scholar
  27. Maillet M, Ford J (2013) Climate change adaptation, indigenous peoples and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Health Dipl Monit 4(2):10–14Google Scholar
  28. Maldonado JK, Bennett TMB, Chief K, Cochran P, Cozzetto K, Gough B, Redsteer MH, Lynn K, Maynard N, Voggesser G (2016) Engagement with Indigenous peoples and honoring traditional knowledge systems. Clim Chang 135:111–126Google Scholar
  29. Maru YT, Smith MS, Sparrow A, Pinho PF, Dube OP (2014) A linked vulnerability and resilience framework for adaptation pathways in remote disadvantaged communities. Glob Environ Chang 28:337–350Google Scholar
  30. Schipper ELF (2006) Conceptual history of adaptation in the UNFCCC process. Rev Eur Commun Int Environ Law 15:82–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schipper ELF, Ayers J, Reid H, Huq S, Rahman A (2014) Community based adaptation to climate change: scaling it up. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Schroeder H (2010) Agency in international climate negotiations: the case of Indigenous peoples and avoided deforestation. Int Environ Agreements-Polit Law Econ 10:317–332Google Scholar
  33. Singh RK, Singh KP, Turner NJ (2013) Why are you asking our gyan (knowledge) and padhati (practice)?: ethics and prior informed consent for research on traditional knowledge systems. Indian J Tradit Knowl 12:547–562Google Scholar
  34. Smith H, Sharp K (2012) Indigenous climate knowledges. WIREs Clim Chang, 3(5):467–476Google Scholar
  35. UNFCCC (2014) Report on the meeting on available tools for the use of indigenous and traditional knowledge and practices for adaptation, needs of local and indigenous communities and the application of gender-sensitive approaches and tools for adaptation. Fourtieth Session of the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice, UNFCCC, BonnGoogle Scholar
  36. UNHRC (2009) Resolution 10/4. Human rights and climate change. Tenth session of the United Nations Human Rights Council.
  37. Waitt G (2010) Doing Foucauldian discourse analysis: revealing social realities. In: Hay I (ed) Qualitative research methods in human geography. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  3. 3.McGill University (Montreal, Canada), Makerere University (Kampala, Uganda), Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (Lima, Peru)and University of GuelphGuelphCanada

Personalised recommendations