The problem of the future in postwar Anglo-American political philosophy

Abstract

Among the conceptual problems raised by climate change is that of how to think about the future. Theories of intergenerational justice and other accounts of obligations to the future in Anglo-American philosophy tend to argue that the remote future matters morally. Where did these arguments come from? This essay explores the roots of contemporary ideas about the remote future in debates that took place among Anglophone philosophers in the 1970s.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Andersson J (2012) The great future debate and the struggle for the world. Am Hist Rev 117(5):1411–1430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arrow KJ, Rawls J (1973) Some Ordinalist-Utilitarian Notes on Rawls's Theory of Justice. The Journal of Philosophy 70(9):245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barry B (1975) Contract theory and future generations. Brian Barry Literary Archive. https://sites.google.com/a/york.ac.uk/brianbarryarchive/unpublishedpapers#TMCUIMP. Accessed 8 May 2015

  4. Barry B (1977a) Rawls on average and total utility. Philos Stud 31(5):317–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barry B (1977b) Justice between generations. In: Hacker PMS, Raz J (eds) Law, morality and society. Clarendon, Oxford, pp 268–284

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barry B (1978) Circumstances of justice and future generations. In: Sikora R, Barry B (eds) Obligations to future generations. Temple, Philadelphia, pp 204–248

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barry B (1983) Intergenerational justice in energy policy. In: Maclean D, Brown PG (eds) Energy and the future. Rowman and Littlefield, Totowa, pp 15–30

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bashford A (2014) Global population. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boulding K (1966) The economics of the coming spaceship earth. In: Jarrett H (ed) Environmental quality in a growing economy. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 3–14

    Google Scholar 

  10. Baumol WJ (1968) On the social rate of discount. Am Econ Rev 58(4):788–802

  11. Broome J (1992) Counting the cost of global warming. White Horse Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  12. Callahan D (1971) What obligations do we have to future generations? Am Eccles Rev 164(4):265–281

    Google Scholar 

  13. Caney S (2014) Climate change, intergenerational equity and the social discount rate. Polit Philos Econ 13(4):320–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cowen T, Parfit D (1992) Against the social discount rate. In: Laslett P, Fishin J (eds) Justice between age groups and generations. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 144–161

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cronon W (1995) Uncommon ground. W W Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dasgupta P (1969) On the concept of optimum population. Rev Econ Stud 36(3):295–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dasgupta P (2008) Discounting climate change. J Risk Uncertain 37(2):141–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Deringer (2013) The present value of the distant future in the early modern past. http://webdocs.stern.nyu.edu/old_web/economics/docs/Financial%20History/Spring%202013/Deringer_Present%20Value%202013.pdf. Accessed 9 May 2015

  19. De-Shalit A (1995) Why posterity matters. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dobb M (1960) An essay on economic growth and planning. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ehrlich P (1968) The population bomb. Sierra Club, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  22. English J (1977) Justice between generations. Philos Stud 31(2):91–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Frederick S, Loewenstein G, O’Donoghue T (2002) Time discounting and time preference: a critical review. J Econ Lit 40(2):351–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Galston W (2010) Realism in political theory. Eur J Polit Theo 10(9):385–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gilman N (2003) Mandarins of the future. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  26. Golding MP (1972) Obligations to future generations. Monist 56(1):85–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Goodin RE (1985) Protecting the vulnerable. Chicago University Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gosseries A, Meyer L (2009) (eds) Intergenerational justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

  29. Gottlieb R (2005) Forcing the spring. Island Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gray J (1975) to Barry B, correspondence. Brian Barry Literary Archive. Cabinet 1, Folder 19B

  31. Hardin G (1974) Lifeboat ethics: the case against helping the poor. Psychol Today 8:38–43

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hubin D (1976) Justice and future generations. Philos Public Aff 6:70–83

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kavka G (1982) The paradox of future individuals. Philos Public Aff 11:93–112

    Google Scholar 

  34. Keynes JM (1963) Essays in persuasion. W W Norton and Co, New Haven, pp 358–374

    Google Scholar 

  35. Laslett P (1970) The conversation between the generations. R Inst Philos Lect 4:172–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Marglin SA (1963) The social rate of discount and the optimal rate of investment. Q J Econ 77(1):95–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Meade J (1964) Efficiency, equality and the ownership of property. George Allen and Unwin, London

    Google Scholar 

  38. Meadows DH et al (1972) The limits to growth. Universe books

  39. Narveson J (1967) Utilitarianism and new generations. Mind 76:62–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Narveson J (1973) Moral problems of population. Monist 57(1):62–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Parfit D (1971) Personal identity. Philos Rev 80(1):3–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Parfit D (1976) On doing the best for our children. In: Bayles MD (ed) Ethics and population. Schenkman Pub. Co, Cambridge, pp 100–115

    Google Scholar 

  43. Parfit D (1983) Energy policy and the further future: the social discount rate. In: Maclean D, Brown PG (eds) Energy and the future. Rowman and Littlefield, New Jersey, pp 166–179

    Google Scholar 

  44. Parfit D (1984) Reasons and persons. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  45. Passmore J (1974) Man’s responsibility for nature. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  46. Pigou AC (1920) Economics of welfare. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  47. Purdy J (2015) After nature. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ramsey FP (1928) A mathematical theory of saving. Econ J 38(152):543–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Rawls J (1958) Justice as fairness. Philos Rev 67(2):164–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  51. Richards D (1983) Contractarian theory, intergenerational justice, and energy policy. In: Maclean D, Brown PG (eds) Energy and the future. Rowman and Littlefield, New Jersey, pp 131–150

    Google Scholar 

  52. Robertson T (2012) The Malthusian moment. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick

    Google Scholar 

  53. Robin L, Sorlin S, Warde P (2013) The future of nature. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  54. Robinson JC (1990) Philosophical origins of the social rate of discount in cost-benefit analysis. Milbank Q 68(2):245–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Samuelson P (1937) A note on measurement of utility. Rev Econ Stud 4:155–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Sen AK (1967) Isolation, assurance and the social rate of discount. Q J Econ 81:112–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Singer P (1976) A utilitarian population principle. In: Bayles MD (ed) Ethics and population. Schenkman Pub. Co., Cambridge, pp 81–99

    Google Scholar 

  58. Solow RM (1974) Intergenerational Equity and Exhaustible Resources. The Review of Economic Studies 41:29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Tullock G (1964) The Social Rate of Discount and the Optimal Rate of Investment: Comment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 78(2):331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Walzer M (1970) Obligations. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  61. Williams B (1984) Personal identity. Lond Rev Books 6(10):14–15

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

For comments I thank Gustaf Arrhenius, Malcolm Bull, Christopher Brooke, Duncan Kelly, Jamie Martin, David Runciman, Sophie Smith, Richard Tuck, Albert Weale, three reviewers and the editors of this issue. Thanks also to Albert Weale, Matt Matravers and John Gray for permission to quote from the Brian Barry Archive, participants of the Cambridge Political Thought Workshop and Princeton Historicizing Climate Change Conference in 2014, and particularly to Jonathan Levy for discussion about uncertainty and the future and Melissa Lane for feedback and encouragement.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katrina Forrester.

Additional information

This article is part of a Special Issue on “Historicizing Climate Change” edited by Melissa Lane, John R. McNeill, Robert H. Socolow, Sverker Sörlin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Forrester, K. The problem of the future in postwar Anglo-American political philosophy. Climatic Change 151, 55–66 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1783-1

Download citation