While the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is continuously improving its communication, visualisation has taken a back seat to more pressing issues. The consequence is a set of IPCC imagery where our understanding of perception remains empirically unchallenged. The visual design (defined in this study as the method, technique, and style used to create a visual) directly affects perception and yet, we know very little about how people intuitively respond to visuals depicting climate science. This study examines the perception of four images from the IPCC summary report for policymakers and two open sourced infographics. Using a group-administered study we found the visual design to have a significant impact on a novice readers ability to associate relevant words with an image. While the visuals part of the summary for policymakers educed a sense of confidence, a well-designed infographic left readers feeling less confident. The veneer of legitimacy associated with IPCC visuals is because they look scientific, whereas infographic images were found to look less serious. We acknowledge the accessibility of an infographic but urge IPCC authors to use it with caution, as any negative impact on scientific credibility is an unwanted feature in IPCC communication.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
“Feel the heat”, Visually, http://visual.ly/feeling-heat, accessed March 2015
“Global Emissions Infographic”, Pinterest, https://www.pinterest.com/pin/555350197771705796, accessed March 2015
SPSS Statistics, IBM Software, version 21, see product site http:// http://www-01.ibm.com/software/analytics/spss/
Barkemeyer R, Dessai S, Monge-Sanz B, BG R, Napolitano G (2015) Linguistic analysis of IPCC summaries for policymakers and associated coverage. Nat Clim Chang. doi:10.1038/nclimate2824
BoehmeNessler V (2011) Pictorial law: modern law and the power of pictures pictorial law: modern law and the power of pictures:1–226
Bostrom A, Anselin L, Farris J (2008) Visualizing seismic risk and uncertainty - a review of related research Ann Ny. Acad Sci 1128:29–40. doi:10.1196/annals.1399.005
Braasch G (2013) Climate change: Is seeing believing? B Atom Sci 69:33–41. doi:10.1177/0096340213508628
Chan CSR, Park HD (2015) How images and color in business plans influence venture investment screening decisions. J Bus Venturing 30:732–748. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.12.002
Dasgupta A, Poco J, YX W, Cook R, Bertini E, CT S (2015) Bridging theory with practice: an exploratory study of visualization use and design for climate model comparison. IEEE T Vis Comput Gr 21:996–1014. doi:10.1109/Tvcg.2015.2413774
Dent B (2002) Cartography: thematic map design. the mcgraw-hill companies, Inc
Elliot AJ, Maier MA, Moller AC, Friedman R, Meinhardt J (2007) Color and psychological functioning: the effect of red on performance attainment J Exp Psychol Gen 136:154–168 doi:10.1037/0096-34184.108.40.206
Glaser WR (1992) Picture naming. Cognition 42:61–105. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(92)90040-O
Granberg D, Brown TA (1989) On affect and cognition in politics. Soc Psychol Quart 52:171–182. doi:10.2307/2786712
Hansen A, Machin D (2013) Researching visual environmental communication introduction. Environ Commun 7:151–168. doi:10.1080/17524032.2013.785441
Huddy L, Gunnthorsdottir AH (2000) The persuasive effects of emotive visual imagery: superficial manipulation or the product of passionate reason? Polit Psychol 21:745–778 doi 10.1111/0162-895x.00215
Hullman J, Diakopoulos N (2011) Visualization rhetoric: framing effects in narrative visualization. IEEE T Vis Comput Gr 17:2231–2240
Kahneman D (2015) Thinking, fast and slow. Fortune 172:20–20
Lankow J, Ritchie, J., and Crooks, R. (2012) Infographics. The power of visual storytelling. Hoboken, New Jersey
Lorenz S, Dessai S, Forster PM, Paavola J (2015) Tailoring the visual communication of climate projections for local adaptation practitioners in Germany and the UK. Phil Trans R Soc A 373:20140457. doi:10.1098/rsta.2014.0457
McMahon R, Stauffacher M, Knutti R (2015) The unseen uncertainties in climate change: reviewing comprehension of an IPCC scenario graph. Clim Chang 133:141–154. doi:10.1007/s10584-015-1473-4
Piai V, Roelofs A, Schriefers H (2015) Task choice and semantic interference in picture naming. Acta Psychol 157:13–22. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.02.003
Scaife M, Rogers Y (1996) External cognition: How do graphical representations work? Int J Hum-Comput St 45:185–213. doi:10.1006/Ijhc.1996.0048
Schiermeier Q, Tollefson J (2015) Four challenges facing newly elected climate chief. New leader of intergovernmental panel on climate change, Hoesung lee, has a full in-tray. Nature. doi:10.1038/nature.2015.18492
Siegrist M, Cvetkovich G (2000) Perception of hazards: the role of social trust and knowledge. Risk Anal 20:713–719. doi:10.1111/0272-4332.205064
Smith MB (2000) Values, politics, and psychology. Am Psychol 55:1151–1152
Stauffer R, Mayr GJ, Dabernig M, Zeileis A (2015) Somewhere over the rainbow how to make effective use of colors in meteorological visualizations. B Am Meteorol Soc 96:203–215. doi:10.1175/Bams-D-13-00155.1
Stephens EM, Edwards TL, Demeritt D (2012) Communicating probabilistic information from climate model ensembles-lessons from numerical weather prediction wires. Clim Chang 3:409–426. doi:10.1002/Wcc.187
Stocker TF, Plattner GK (2016) Making use of the IPCC’s powerful communication tool. Nat Clim Change. doi:10.1038/nclimate3010
Tal A, Wansink B (2014) Blinded with science: trivial graphs and formulas increase ad persuasiveness and belief in product efficacy. Public Underst Sci:1–9. doi:10.1177/0963662514549688
Zacks J, Tversky B (1999) Bars and lines: a study of graphic communication Mem. Cognition 27:1073–1079. doi:10.3758/Bf03201236
About this article
Cite this article
McMahon, R., Stauffacher, M. & Knutti, R. The scientific veneer of IPCC visuals. Climatic Change 138, 369–381 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1758-2
- Visual Stimulus
- Climate Science
- Visual Design
- Scientific Credibility
- Friedmans ANOVA