Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Competing priorities: how actors and institutions influence adaptation of the German railway system

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Large-scale infrastructure networks are vulnerable to climate change. Their operation involves public and private actors under complex legislative and market regulations. We analyze climate adaptation of railway infrastructure, based on an in-depth case study of the German railway system. The case includes a unique set of qualitative interviews with key players of operating and regulative organizations, as well as a document study. Our analysis crucially extends previous technology-oriented research on the railway sector by applying core insights and categories from the actor-centered institutionalism. We trace observed obstacles for a climate resilient railway system and adaptation decisions back to deeper causes, in particular political priorities and values. Moreover, diverging perceptions and the competition among different actors hamper adaptation. On the other hand, single actors who display a great willingness to act are able to make use of unclear responsibilities to integrate adaptation concerns into existing institutions. Our research suggests that changes in technical standards and in economic regulation support adaptation of infrastructure systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Following Godschalk (2003) and Mileti (1999) we understand a resilient railway system as one that “is able to withstand an extreme natural event without suffering devastating losses, damage, diminishing productivity […] and without a large amount of assistance from outside the community” (Mileti 1999, p. 32–33), as well as one “able to […] function under extreme stress” (Godschalk 2003, p. 137).

  2. The German railway system consists of actors (railway companies, public authorities), institutions (laws, financing mechanisms, standards, etc.) and technical artifacts (railway infrastructure) that build the cornerstone for the German railway transport.

  3. Composite actors can be divided into collective and corporate actors. Collective actors are coordinated actions of individuals, who can act by themselves; corporate actors are formal, organized majorities of people with centralized resources of action. Corporate actors usually are top-down organizations with hierarchical leadership (van Lieshout 2009).

  4. DB is the dominant player and operates about 90 % of the rail network (VDV 2014). Railway infrastructure that is not federally owned and other railway undertakings are not considered in the analysis.

  5. Our empirical focus is on the national level and major actors. Since major decisions on railway infrastructure are taken on the national level, this justifies the pragmatic research focus.

References

  • Aparicio Á, Leitner M, Mylne K, et al (2013) Support to transport and environment assessments. Adaptation to Climate Change in the Transport Sector. ETC/CCA Technical Paper 03/2013, Bologna, Italy

  • Arnell NW, Delaney KE (2006) Adapting to climate change: public water supply in England and Wales. Clim Chang 2006:227–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker CJ, Chapman L, Quinn A, Dobney K (2010) Climate change and the railway industry: a review. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci 224:519–528

  • Berkhout F (2012) Adaptation to climate change by organizations. WIREs Clim Change 3:91–106. doi:10.1002/wcc.154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkhout F, Hertin J, Gann DM (2006) Learning to adapt: Organisational adaptation to climate change impacts. Clim Chang 78:135–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard RH, Ryan GW (2010) Analyzing qualitative data. Systematic approaches. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesbroek R, Klostermann J, Termeer C, Kabat P (2011) Barriers to climate change adaptation in the Netherlands. Climate Law 2:181–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton I (2014) Practical adaptation: past, present and future. In: Palutikof JP, Boulter SL, Barnett J, Rissik D (eds) Applied studies in climate adaptation. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch T (2011) Organizational adaptation to disruptions in the natural environment: the case of climate change. Scand J Manag 27:389–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirel H, Nemry F (2012) Impacts of Climate Change on Transport: A focus on road and rail transport infrastructures

  • Dienel H-L (2007) Das Bundesverkehrsministerium. In: Schöller O, Canzler W, Knie A (eds) Handbuch Verkehrspolitik. Campus, Frankfurt/ New York, pp. 200–224

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dupuis J, Knoepfel P (2013) The Adaptation Policy Paradox: the Implementation Deficit of Policies Framed as Climate Change Adaptation

  • Eisenack K, Stecker R (2012) A framework for analyzing climate change adaptations as actions. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 17:243–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenack K, Stecker R, Reckien D, Hoffmann E (2012) Adaptation to climate change in the transport sector: a review of actions and actors. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 17:451–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenack K, Moser S, Hoffmann E, et al. (2014) Explaining and overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation. Nat Clim Chang 4:867–872. doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE2350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2013) Adapting infrastructure to climate change.

  • Godschalk DR (2003) Urban hazard mitigation: creating resilient cities. Nat Hazard Rev 4:136–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertin J, Berkhout F, Gann D, Barlow J (2003) Climate change and the UK-Housebuilding sector. Build Res Inf 31:278–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HM Government (2011) Climate resilient infrastructure: preparing for a changing climate, London

  • Inderberg TH (2011) Institutional constraints to adaptive capacity: adaptability to climate change in the Norwegian electricity sector. Local Environ 16:303–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inderberg TH (2012) Governance for climate-change adaptive capacity in the Swedish electricity sector. Public Manag Rev 14:967–985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inderberg TH, Løchen LA (2012) Adaptation to climate change among electricity distribution companies in Norway and Sweden: lessons from the field. Local Environ 17:663–678. doi:10.1080/13549839.2011.646971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jäger UP, Rehli F (2012) Cooperative power relations between nonprofit board chairs and executive directors. Nonprofit Manag Leadersh 23:219–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaroszweski D, Quinn A, Baker C, et al (2014) Guidebook for Enhancing Resilience of European Rail Transport in Extreme Weather Events

  • Klein RJT, Juhola S (2014) A framework for Nordic actor-oriented climate adaptation research

  • Kuckartz U (2014) Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung, 2nd edn. Beltz Juventa, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmkuhl D (2006) ‚...und sie bewegt sich doch‘. Der späte Bruch mit verkehrspolitischen Pfadabhängigkeiten durch europäische Integration und nationalen Reformdruck. In: Schmidt MG, Zohlnhöfer R (eds) Regieren in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Innen- und Außenpolitik seit 1949. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden,

  • Lindgren J, Jonsson DK, Carlsson-Kanyama A (2009) Climate adaptation of railways: lessons from Sweden. EJTIR 9:164–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz R, Scharpf FW (1995) Der Ansatz des akteurzentrierten Institutionalismus. In: Mayntz R, Scharpf FW (eds) Gesellschaftliche Selbstregelung und politische Steuerung. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt/ New York, pp. 39–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Mileti DS (1999) Disasters by design: a reassessment of natural hazards in the United States. Joseph Henry Press, Washington D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Molarius R (2012) EWENT. Extreme weather impacts on European networks of transport. Weather hazards and vulnerabilities for the European transport system - a risk panorama

  • Moser SC, Ekstrom JA (2010) A framework to diagnose barriers to climate adaptation

  • Network Rail (2011) Network Rail Climate Change Adaptation Report

  • Nolte R (2008) Impact of climate change on railway infrastructure & adaptation strategies and measures. Institute for Futures Studies and Technology Assessment, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolte R, Kamburow C, Rupp J (2011) ARISCC - adaptation of railway infrastructure to climate change - final report. Berlin

  • Pechan A, Rotter M, Eisenack K (2011) Anpassung in der Versorgungswirtschaft. Empirische Befunde und Einflussfaktoren. In: Karczmarzyk A, Pfriem R (eds) Klimaanpassungsstrategien von Unternehmen. Metropolis, Marburg, pp. 313–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Regmi MB, Hanaoka S (2009) Impacts of Climate Change on Transport and Adaptation in Asia

  • Rudberg PM, Wallgren O, Swartling ÅG (2012) Beyond generic adaptive capacity: exploring the adaptation space of the water supply and wastewater sector of the Stockholm region, Sweden. Clim Chang 114:707–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryghaug M, Solli J (2012) The appropriation of the climate change problem among road managers: fighting in the trenches of the real world. Clim Chang 114:427–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savonis MJ, Burkett VR, Potter JR (2008) Impacts of climate change and variability on transportation systems and infrastructure: Gulf Coast study. Phase 1

  • Scharpf FW (1997) Games real actors play: actor-centered institutionalism in policy research. Westview Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenhof P, Sparling E (2011) The role of codes, standards, and related instruments in facilitating adaptation to climate change. In: Ford JD, Berrang-Ford L (eds) Climate change adaptation in developed nations. Springer, Heidelberg, London, New York, pp. 243–254

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • The World Bank (2015) Rail lines (total route-km). http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IS.RRS.TOTL.KM. Accessed 25 Feb 2015

  • TRB TRB (2008) Potential Impacts of Climate Change on U.S. Transportation. National Research Council of the National Academies, Washington

  • Trinks C, Hiete M, Comes T, Schultmann F (2012) Extreme weather events and road and rail transportation in Germany. Int J Emerg Manag 8:207–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Lieshout H (2009) An actor-centered institutionalist approach to flexicurity: the example of vocational education and training

  • VDV [Verband deutscher Verkehrsunternehmen e.V.] (2014) Deutschlands Lebensadern. http://www.vdv.de/infrastruktur.aspx. Accessed 07 Oct 2014

  • Wise RM, Fazey I, Stafford Smith M, et al. (2014) Reconceptualising adaptation to climate change as part of pathways of change and response. Glob Environ Chang. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.002

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, BMBF) in the Socio-Ecological Research initiative (SÖF) under Grant No. 01UU0910 (Project Chameleon, www.climate-chameleon.de). We are especially grateful to Nils Marscheider, Felix Reutter, Jacob Beutler and Johanna Schmidt for their valuable contributions in preparing interview data, relevant documents and literature streams. We thank Klaus Eisenack, Katrien Termeer and two anonymous reviewers for constructive feedback. Finally, we are indebted to our interview partners for their openness and cooperation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Semmelweisstr. 6, Potsdam, 14482, Germany

    Maja Rotter

  2. Institute for Ecological Economy Research (IÖW), Potsdamer Str. 105, 10785, Berlin, Germany

    Esther Hoffmann

  3. Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Ammerländer Heerstr. 114-118, 26129, Oldenburg, Germany

    Anna Pechan

  4. Department “Climate Protection, Climate Change”, Hessian Ministry of the Environment, Climate Protection, Agriculture and Consumer Protection, Mainzer Straße 80, 65189, Wiesbaden, Germany

    Rebecca Stecker

Authors
  1. Maja Rotter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Esther Hoffmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anna Pechan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rebecca Stecker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Esther Hoffmann.

Additional information

Maja Rotter conducted the research during her previous affiliation with IÖW and Rebecca Stecker during her previous affiliation with the University of Oldenburg. The presented research and its results do not necessarily reflect the views of the ministry.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Appendix 1

(DOCX 16 kb)

Appendix 2

(DOCX 15 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rotter, M., Hoffmann, E., Pechan, A. et al. Competing priorities: how actors and institutions influence adaptation of the German railway system. Climatic Change 137, 609–623 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1702-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1702-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation