Advertisement

Climatic Change

, Volume 137, Issue 3–4, pp 609–623 | Cite as

Competing priorities: how actors and institutions influence adaptation of the German railway system

  • Maja Rotter
  • Esther HoffmannEmail author
  • Anna Pechan
  • Rebecca Stecker
Article

Abstract

Large-scale infrastructure networks are vulnerable to climate change. Their operation involves public and private actors under complex legislative and market regulations. We analyze climate adaptation of railway infrastructure, based on an in-depth case study of the German railway system. The case includes a unique set of qualitative interviews with key players of operating and regulative organizations, as well as a document study. Our analysis crucially extends previous technology-oriented research on the railway sector by applying core insights and categories from the actor-centered institutionalism. We trace observed obstacles for a climate resilient railway system and adaptation decisions back to deeper causes, in particular political priorities and values. Moreover, diverging perceptions and the competition among different actors hamper adaptation. On the other hand, single actors who display a great willingness to act are able to make use of unclear responsibilities to integrate adaptation concerns into existing institutions. Our research suggests that changes in technical standards and in economic regulation support adaptation of infrastructure systems.

Keywords

Climate Change Adaptation Extreme Weather Event Railway System Actor Constellation Institutional Void 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, BMBF) in the Socio-Ecological Research initiative (SÖF) under Grant No. 01UU0910 (Project Chameleon, www.climate-chameleon.de). We are especially grateful to Nils Marscheider, Felix Reutter, Jacob Beutler and Johanna Schmidt for their valuable contributions in preparing interview data, relevant documents and literature streams. We thank Klaus Eisenack, Katrien Termeer and two anonymous reviewers for constructive feedback. Finally, we are indebted to our interview partners for their openness and cooperation.

Supplementary material

10584_2016_1702_MOESM1_ESM.docx (18 kb)
Appendix 1 (DOCX 16 kb)
10584_2016_1702_MOESM2_ESM.docx (34 kb)
Appendix 2 (DOCX 15 kb)

References

  1. Aparicio Á, Leitner M, Mylne K, et al (2013) Support to transport and environment assessments. Adaptation to Climate Change in the Transport Sector. ETC/CCA Technical Paper 03/2013, Bologna, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnell NW, Delaney KE (2006) Adapting to climate change: public water supply in England and Wales. Clim Chang 2006:227–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker CJ, Chapman L, Quinn A, Dobney K (2010) Climate change and the railway industry: a review. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci 224:519–528Google Scholar
  4. Berkhout F (2012) Adaptation to climate change by organizations. WIREs Clim Change 3:91–106. doi: 10.1002/wcc.154 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berkhout F, Hertin J, Gann DM (2006) Learning to adapt: Organisational adaptation to climate change impacts. Clim Chang 78:135–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernard RH, Ryan GW (2010) Analyzing qualitative data. Systematic approaches. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  7. Biesbroek R, Klostermann J, Termeer C, Kabat P (2011) Barriers to climate change adaptation in the Netherlands. Climate Law 2:181–199Google Scholar
  8. Burton I (2014) Practical adaptation: past, present and future. In: Palutikof JP, Boulter SL, Barnett J, Rissik D (eds) Applied studies in climate adaptation. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  9. Busch T (2011) Organizational adaptation to disruptions in the natural environment: the case of climate change. Scand J Manag 27:389–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Demirel H, Nemry F (2012) Impacts of Climate Change on Transport: A focus on road and rail transport infrastructuresGoogle Scholar
  11. Dienel H-L (2007) Das Bundesverkehrsministerium. In: Schöller O, Canzler W, Knie A (eds) Handbuch Verkehrspolitik. Campus, Frankfurt/ New York, pp. 200–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dupuis J, Knoepfel P (2013) The Adaptation Policy Paradox: the Implementation Deficit of Policies Framed as Climate Change AdaptationGoogle Scholar
  13. Eisenack K, Stecker R (2012) A framework for analyzing climate change adaptations as actions. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 17:243–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eisenack K, Stecker R, Reckien D, Hoffmann E (2012) Adaptation to climate change in the transport sector: a review of actions and actors. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 17:451–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eisenack K, Moser S, Hoffmann E, et al. (2014) Explaining and overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation. Nat Clim Chang 4:867–872. doi: 10.1038/NCLIMATE2350 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. European Commission (2013) Adapting infrastructure to climate change.Google Scholar
  17. Godschalk DR (2003) Urban hazard mitigation: creating resilient cities. Nat Hazard Rev 4:136–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hertin J, Berkhout F, Gann D, Barlow J (2003) Climate change and the UK-Housebuilding sector. Build Res Inf 31:278–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. HM Government (2011) Climate resilient infrastructure: preparing for a changing climate, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Inderberg TH (2011) Institutional constraints to adaptive capacity: adaptability to climate change in the Norwegian electricity sector. Local Environ 16:303–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Inderberg TH (2012) Governance for climate-change adaptive capacity in the Swedish electricity sector. Public Manag Rev 14:967–985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Inderberg TH, Løchen LA (2012) Adaptation to climate change among electricity distribution companies in Norway and Sweden: lessons from the field. Local Environ 17:663–678. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2011.646971 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jäger UP, Rehli F (2012) Cooperative power relations between nonprofit board chairs and executive directors. Nonprofit Manag Leadersh 23:219–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jaroszweski D, Quinn A, Baker C, et al (2014) Guidebook for Enhancing Resilience of European Rail Transport in Extreme Weather EventsGoogle Scholar
  25. Klein RJT, Juhola S (2014) A framework for Nordic actor-oriented climate adaptation researchGoogle Scholar
  26. Kuckartz U (2014) Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung, 2nd edn. Beltz Juventa, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  27. Lehmkuhl D (2006) ‚...und sie bewegt sich doch‘. Der späte Bruch mit verkehrspolitischen Pfadabhängigkeiten durch europäische Integration und nationalen Reformdruck. In: Schmidt MG, Zohlnhöfer R (eds) Regieren in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Innen- und Außenpolitik seit 1949. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden,Google Scholar
  28. Lindgren J, Jonsson DK, Carlsson-Kanyama A (2009) Climate adaptation of railways: lessons from Sweden. EJTIR 9:164–181Google Scholar
  29. Mayntz R, Scharpf FW (1995) Der Ansatz des akteurzentrierten Institutionalismus. In: Mayntz R, Scharpf FW (eds) Gesellschaftliche Selbstregelung und politische Steuerung. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt/ New York, pp. 39–72Google Scholar
  30. Mileti DS (1999) Disasters by design: a reassessment of natural hazards in the United States. Joseph Henry Press, Washington D.CGoogle Scholar
  31. Molarius R (2012) EWENT. Extreme weather impacts on European networks of transport. Weather hazards and vulnerabilities for the European transport system - a risk panoramaGoogle Scholar
  32. Moser SC, Ekstrom JA (2010) A framework to diagnose barriers to climate adaptationGoogle Scholar
  33. Network Rail (2011) Network Rail Climate Change Adaptation ReportGoogle Scholar
  34. Nolte R (2008) Impact of climate change on railway infrastructure & adaptation strategies and measures. Institute for Futures Studies and Technology Assessment, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  35. Nolte R, Kamburow C, Rupp J (2011) ARISCC - adaptation of railway infrastructure to climate change - final report. BerlinGoogle Scholar
  36. Pechan A, Rotter M, Eisenack K (2011) Anpassung in der Versorgungswirtschaft. Empirische Befunde und Einflussfaktoren. In: Karczmarzyk A, Pfriem R (eds) Klimaanpassungsstrategien von Unternehmen. Metropolis, Marburg, pp. 313–336Google Scholar
  37. Regmi MB, Hanaoka S (2009) Impacts of Climate Change on Transport and Adaptation in AsiaGoogle Scholar
  38. Rudberg PM, Wallgren O, Swartling ÅG (2012) Beyond generic adaptive capacity: exploring the adaptation space of the water supply and wastewater sector of the Stockholm region, Sweden. Clim Chang 114:707–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ryghaug M, Solli J (2012) The appropriation of the climate change problem among road managers: fighting in the trenches of the real world. Clim Chang 114:427–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Savonis MJ, Burkett VR, Potter JR (2008) Impacts of climate change and variability on transportation systems and infrastructure: Gulf Coast study. Phase 1Google Scholar
  41. Scharpf FW (1997) Games real actors play: actor-centered institutionalism in policy research. Westview Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  42. Steenhof P, Sparling E (2011) The role of codes, standards, and related instruments in facilitating adaptation to climate change. In: Ford JD, Berrang-Ford L (eds) Climate change adaptation in developed nations. Springer, Heidelberg, London, New York, pp. 243–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. The World Bank (2015) Rail lines (total route-km). http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IS.RRS.TOTL.KM. Accessed 25 Feb 2015
  44. TRB TRB (2008) Potential Impacts of Climate Change on U.S. Transportation. National Research Council of the National Academies, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  45. Trinks C, Hiete M, Comes T, Schultmann F (2012) Extreme weather events and road and rail transportation in Germany. Int J Emerg Manag 8:207–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. van Lieshout H (2009) An actor-centered institutionalist approach to flexicurity: the example of vocational education and trainingGoogle Scholar
  47. VDV [Verband deutscher Verkehrsunternehmen e.V.] (2014) Deutschlands Lebensadern. http://www.vdv.de/infrastruktur.aspx. Accessed 07 Oct 2014
  48. Wise RM, Fazey I, Stafford Smith M, et al. (2014) Reconceptualising adaptation to climate change as part of pathways of change and response. Glob Environ Chang. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.002 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maja Rotter
    • 1
  • Esther Hoffmann
    • 2
    Email author
  • Anna Pechan
    • 3
  • Rebecca Stecker
    • 4
  1. 1.PotsdamGermany
  2. 2.Institute for Ecological Economy Research (IÖW)BerlinGermany
  3. 3.Carl von Ossietzky University of OldenburgOldenburgGermany
  4. 4.Department “Climate Protection, Climate Change”Hessian Ministry of the Environment, Climate Protection, Agriculture and Consumer ProtectionWiesbadenGermany

Personalised recommendations