A pioneer country? A history of Norwegian climate politics

Article
  • 253 Downloads

Abstract

The shift away from ecology towards climatology in Norwegian environmental policy in the late 1980s and 1990s was not accidental. A main mover was the Labor Party politician Gro Harlem Brundtland who did not want to deal with unruly and highly vocal Deep Ecologists. Better then to start afresh with a different set of environmental scholars appealing to the technocratic tradition within the Labor Party. Instead of changing the ethical and social ways of dealing with environmental problems as the Deep Ecologists were advocating, she was looking for technological and economic solutions. And she mobilized an international regime of carbon capture storage (CCS), tradable carbon emissions quota (TEQs), and clean development mechanisms (CDMs), all of which eventually were approved in Kyoto in 1997. This move towards technocracy and cost-benefit economics reflects a post-Cold War turn towards utilitarian capitalism, but also a longing to showcase Norway as an environmental pioneer country to the world. The underlying question was how to reconcile the nation’s booming petroleum industry with reduction in climate gas emissions. Should the oil and gas stay underground and the country strive towards the ecologically informed zerogrowth society the Deep Ecologists were envisioning? Or could growth in the petroleum industry take place without harming the environment as the Labor Party environmentalists argued?

References

  1. Aardal B, Henry V (1995) Konflikt og opinion. NKS-forlaget, OsloGoogle Scholar
  2. Alstadheim KB (2010) Klimaparadokset: Jens Stoltenberg om vår tids største utfordirng. Aschehoug, OsloGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersen W, Bugge HC, Meier-Hansen D, Branck OW, Eskeland S (1977) Bravoutblåsningen: Aksjonsledelsens rapport, Norges Offentlige Utredninger 57. Universitetsforlaget, OsloGoogle Scholar
  4. Anker P (2007) Science as a vacation: a history of ecology in Norway. Hist Sci 45:455–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anonymous (1968) Working meeting on analysis of ecosystems: tundra zone ustaosetGoogle Scholar
  6. Anonymous (1970) Og etter oss… Naturvernforbundet, OsloGoogle Scholar
  7. Anonymous (1971) Og havet vil stige, VG March 27Google Scholar
  8. Anonymous (1990) Executive summary, in Mykletun J (ed.) Sustainable development, science policy: the conference report. Oslo: Norwegian Research Council for Science and the Humanities, 9Google Scholar
  9. Anonymous (2000) CICERO senter for klimaforskning: en evaluering. Norges forskningsråd, OsloGoogle Scholar
  10. Asdal K (2011) Politikkens natur – naturens politikk. Universitetsforlaget, OsloGoogle Scholar
  11. Benestad O (1978) Overvekst eller likevekt? Industrivekstsamfunnets sammenbrudd - skisse av et nytt likevektsamfunn. MiljØko, OsloGoogle Scholar
  12. Bolin B (2007) A history of the science and politics of climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Borowy I (2014) Defining sustainable development for our common future: a history of the world commission on environment and development (Brundtland commission). Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Braathen G (2000) Sluttrapport fra forskningsprogram om klima- og ozon spørsmål 1989–1998. Norsk Institutt for Luftforskning, OsloGoogle Scholar
  15. Brown L (1981) Building a sustainable society. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Brown L, Starke L (1984) State of the world 1985: a worldwatch institute report on progress toward a sustainable society. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Brundtland GH (1975) Stortingsforhandlinger 1974/1975, 13 May, 4163Google Scholar
  18. Brundtland GH (1977) Forskning, forvaltning og politikk. Ting 2:24–31, 28Google Scholar
  19. Brundtland GH, Walløe L (1976) Menarcheal age in Norway in the 19th century: a re-evaluation of historical sources. Ann Hum Biol 3:363–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Carpenter R (1981) Assessing tropical forest lands: their suitability for sustainable uses. Tycooly International, DublinGoogle Scholar
  21. Central Bureau of Statistics (1970, 1974) Outdoor life, Oslo: Government PrintingGoogle Scholar
  22. Dahl E (1966) Forelesninger i økologi Ås archiveGoogle Scholar
  23. Edwards PN (2010) A vast machine: computer models, climate data, and the politics of global warming. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Fleming JR (2005) Historical perspectives on climate change. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  25. Hansson S, Teigene IH (1992) Makt og mannefall: Historien om Gro Harlem Brundtland. Cappelen, OsloGoogle Scholar
  26. Hare FK (1986) Mandate for change: the relevance of climate. World Commission archive, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  27. Hjorthol LM (2006) Alta: Kraftkampen som utfordret statens makt. Gyldendal, OsloGoogle Scholar
  28. Karlsen HT (2014) The cost of participating in the greenhouse gas emission permit marked. Statistics Norway, OsloGoogle Scholar
  29. Kelin N (2014) This changes everything: capitalism vs. climate. Simon and Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Knorr D (1983) Sustainable food systems. Ellis Horwood, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  31. Kofoed JE (1978) Nok ein sigar for kraftfantastane? Snm-nytt 1 Jan., 3Google Scholar
  32. Kvaløy SS (1987) Vår felles framtid – symptom på katastrofe? Nytt fra Universitetet i Oslo Nov. 8., 16–19Google Scholar
  33. Martiniussen E (2013) Drivhuseffekten: Klimapolitikken som forsvant. Manifest, OsloGoogle Scholar
  34. Meadows DH et al (1972) The limits to growth: a report for the club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. Potomac, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Ministry of the Environment (1989) St.meld. nr 46 (1988–1989): Miljø og utvikling: Norges oppfølging av Verdenskommisjonens rapport. Goverment Printing, OsloGoogle Scholar
  36. Nilsen Y (2001) En felles plattform? Norsk oljeindustri og klimadebatten i Norge fram til 1998. TMV Senter, OsloGoogle Scholar
  37. Næss A (1973) The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movements: a summary. Inquiry 16:95–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Næss A (1976) Økologi, safmunn og livsstil. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, pp 116–175Google Scholar
  39. Østerud Ø (2006) Lite land som humanitær stormakt? Nytt Norsk Tidsskrift 4:303–316Google Scholar
  40. Parr H, Bryne KH, Hofseth P, Riekeles J (1974) Energi, miljø og samfunn: en utredning fra Norges naturvernforbund utarbeidet av forbundets energiutvalg. Norges naturvernforbund, OsloGoogle Scholar
  41. Paulsen G et al (2014) Building trust: the history of DNV 1864–2014. Dinamo, OsloGoogle Scholar
  42. Pirages D (1977) The sustainable society: implications for limited growth. Praeger, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Randalls S (2011) Optimal climate change: economics and climate science policy histories (from heuristic to normative). Osiris 26:224–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Randers J (1975) A quest for a sustainable society. Gruppen for Ressurssstudier, OsloGoogle Scholar
  45. Reinertsen M (2009) Oljefondets utspring, Morgenbladet 22. maiGoogle Scholar
  46. Rosenqvist IT (1989) Den store miljøbløffen. Vegviseren 16:8–9Google Scholar
  47. Sörlin S (2011) The anxieties of a science diplomat. Osiris 26:66–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stoltenberg J (1985) Makroøkonomisk planlegging under usikkerhet – en empirisk analyse. Statistisk sentralbyrå, OsloGoogle Scholar
  49. Viksveen T (2011) Jens stoltenberg: et portrett. Pax, OsloGoogle Scholar
  50. Weart SR (2003) The discovery of global warming. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  51. World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.New York UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations