Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Perceived and projected flood risk and adaptation in coastal Southeast Queensland, Australia

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evidence on the impacts of climate change is rapidly increasing but there is little change to the speed of climate adaptation by governments and individuals. There are multiple barriers to climate adaptation, including among others: the lack of the public understanding of risks, lack of leadership and availability of resources to adapt. In this study, we assess to what extent coastal residents understand their properties’ flood risk, and what predicts their risk perception and adaptation behaviour. We surveyed 420 individuals in South East Queensland projected to be within the permanent or temporary flood zone in 2100 based on combined sea-level rise and storm surge scenarios. We assessed the correlations between the projected (i.e. objective) and perceived risk of inundation, adaptation behaviour, and the individual characteristics considered to influence risk perception and adaptation. While we found a correlation between perceived and some objective flood risks, perceived risk only partially reflected objective risk. Other factors that influenced risk perception were previous experience of flooding events, belief in climate change, risk aversion, age and gender. Factors driving risk perception varied with the type (permanent, temporary) and frequency of flooding event (1 in 20 or 1 in 100 years). Previous experience with extreme event impacts and belief in climate change influenced all future perceived risks. However, even after being impacted by an extreme event, adaptation was moderate (58 %). Personal as well as environmental factors influence the likelihood of adaptation. The moderate adaptation response within our case study is likely a result of most respondents considering large flooding events to be rare and of limited impact, and anticipating future government aid to overcome flooding damage costs. Existing attitudes towards risk, which influence the extent of proactive adaptation, should be of concern to governments who will likely be facing these costs at increasing frequencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Adger WN, Dessai S, Goulden M, Hulme M, Lorenzoni I, Nelson DR, Naess LO, Wolf J, Wreford A (2009) Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Clim Chang 93:335–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arkema KK, Guannel G, Verutes G, Wood SA, Guerry A, Ruckelshaus M, Kareiva P, Lacayo M, Silver JM (2013) Coastal habitats shield people and property from sea-level rise and storms. Nat Clim Chang 3:913–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell J (2014) Climate change and coastal development law in Australia. Federation Press, Annandale

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell J, Saunders MI, Leon JX, Mills M, Kythreotis A, Phinn S, Mumby PJ, Lovelock CE, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Morrison T (2014) Maps, laws and planning policy: working with biophysical and spatial uncertainty in the case of sea level rise. Environ Sci Pol 44:247–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berke P, Lyles W (2013) Public risks and the challenges to climate-change adaptation: A proposed framework for planning in the age of uncertainty. Cityscape 15:181–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakely EJ, Carbonell A (2012) Resilient Coastal City regions: planning for climate change in the United States and Australia. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Burby RJ (2006) Hurricane Katrina and the paradoxes of government disaster policy: bringing about wise governmental decisions for hazardous areas. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 604:171–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai W, Borlace S, Lengaigne M, Van Rensch P, Collins M, Vecchi G, Timmermann A, Santoso A, McPhaden MJ, Wu L (2014) Increasing frequency of extreme El Niño events due to greenhouse warming. Nat Clim Chang 4:111–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia (2011) Inquiry into flood insurance and related matters: Final report. http://www.ndir.gov.au/content/report/downloads/NDIR_final.pdf. Accessed 10 Aug 2015

  • Cook J, Nuccitelli D, Green SA, Richardson M, Winkler B, Painting R, Way R, Jacobs P, Skuce A (2013) Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environ Res Lett 8:024024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper H, Chen Q (2013) Incorporating uncertainty of future sea-level rise estimates into vulnerability assessment: A case study in Kahului, Maui. Clim Chang 121:635–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobes L, Jotzo F, Doupé P (2013) Adaptor of last resort? An economic perspective on the Government’s role in adaptation to climate change. National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility, Gold Coast

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn J, Slovic P, Mertz CK (1994) Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks. Risk Anal 14:1101–1108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier TG, Wood N, Yarnal B (2010) Stakeholder perspectives on land-use strategies for adapting to climate-change-enhanced coastal hazards: Sarasota, Florida. Appl Geogr 30:506–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garvin T (2001) Analytical paradigms: the epistemological distances between scientists, policy makers, and the public. Risk Anal 21:443–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gawande K, Jenkins-Smith H (2001) Nuclear waste transport and residential property values: estimating the effects of perceived risks. J Environ Econ Manag 42:207–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamlington B, Strassburg M, Leben R, Han W, Nerem R, Kim K (2014) Uncovering an anthropogenic sea-level rise signal in the Pacific Ocean. Nat Clim Chang 4:782–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson S, Vitek JD, Hanson PO (1979) Natural disaster long-range impact on human response to future disaster threats. Environ Behav 11:268–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath Y, Gifford R (2006) Free-market ideology and environmental degradation the case of belief in global climate change. Environ Behav 38:48–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helweg-Larsen M (1999) (The lack of) optimistic biases in response to the 1994 Northridge earthquake: the role of personal experience. Basic Appl Soc Psychol 21:119–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoegh-Guldberg O, Bruno JF (2010) The impact of climate change on the World’s marine ecosystems. Science 328:1523–1528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlimann A, Barnett J, Fincher R, Osbaldiston N, Mortreux C, Graham S (2014) Urban planning and sustainable adaptation to sea-level rise. Landsc Urban Plan 126:84–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson MM, Pellikka H, Kahma KK, Ruosteenoja K (2014) Global sea level rise scenarios adapted to the Finnish coast. J Mar Syst 129:35–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplow L (1991) Incentives and government relief for risk. J Risk Uncertain 4:167–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellens W, Zaalberg R, Neutens T, Vanneuville W, De Maeyer P (2011) An analysis of the public perception of flood risk on the Belgian Coast. Risk Anal 31:1055–1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koerth J, Jones N, Vafeidis AT, Dimitrakopoulos PG, Melliou A, Chatzidimitriou E, Koukoulas S (2013) Household adaptation and intention to adapt to coastal flooding in the axios – loudias – Aliakmonas National park, Greece. Ocean Coast Manag 82:43–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther H (2008) Reducing losses from catastrophic risks through long-term insurance and mitigation. Soc Res 75:905–930

    Google Scholar 

  • Leon JX, Heuvelink GBM, Phinn SR (2014) Incorporating DEM Uncertainty in coastal inundation mapping. PLoS one 9:e108727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leon JX, Hardcastle, J., James, R., Albert, S., Kereseka, J., Woodroffe, C.D., (2015) Supporting local and traditional knowledge with science for adaptation to climate change: lessons learned from participatory three-dimensional modelling in BoeBoe, Solomon Islands.. Coastal Mangement Accepted, December 2014

  • Lindell MK (1994) Perceived characteristics of environmental hazards. Int J Mass Emerg and Disasters 12:303–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindell MK, Hwang SN (2008) Households’ perceived personal risk and responses in a multihazard environment. Risk Anal 28:539–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindell MK, Perry RW (2000) Household adjustment to earthquake hazard a review of research. Environ Behav 32:461–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendelsohn R (2000) Efficient adaptation to climate change. Climatic Change 45:583–600

  • Mills M, Nicol S, Wells JA, Lahoz-Monfort JJ, Wintle B, Bode M, Wardrop M, Walshe T, Probert WJM, Runge MC, Possingham HP, Madden EM (2014) Minimizing the cost of keeping options open for conservation in a changing climate. Conserv Biol 28:646–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser SC, Jeffress Williams S, Boesch DF (2012) Wicked challenges at land’s end: managing coastal vulnerability under climate change. Annu Rev Environ Resour 37:51–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls RJ (2004) Coastal flooding and wetland loss in the 21st century: changes under the SRES climate and socio-economic scenarios. Global Environ Chang Hum Policy Dimens 14:69–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls RJ, Marinova N, Lowe JA, Brown S, Vellinga P, De Gusmao D, Hinkel J, Tol RSJ (2011) Sea-level rise and its possible impacts given a ‘beyond 4 degrees C world’ in the twenty-first century. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 369:161–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris FH, Smith T, Kaniasty K (1999) Revisiting the experience–behavior hypothesis: the effects of hurricane Hugo on hazard preparedness and other self-protective acts. Basic Appl Soc Psychol 21:37–47

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor R, Bord R, Fisher A (1999) Risk perceptions, General Environmental Beliefs, and willingness to address climate change. Risk Anal 19:461–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Osberghaus D, Finkel E, Pohl M (2010) Individual adaptation to climate change: the role of information and perceived risk. ZEW Discussion Papers.

  • Peacock WG, Brody SD, Highfield W (2005) Hurricane risk perceptions among Florida’s single family homeowners. Landsc Urban Plan 73:120–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranasinghe R, Callaghan D, Stive MJ (2012) Estimating coastal recession due to sea level rise: beyond the Bruun rule. Clim Chang 110:561–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic PE (2000) The perception of risk. Earthscan publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Terpstra T (2011) Emotions, trust, and perceived risk: affective and cognitive routes to flood preparedness behavior. Risk Anal 31:1658–1675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The World Bank (2010) World development report 2010: development and climate change. World Bank, Washington D.C

  • UNISDR (2015) Making development sustainable: the future of disaster risk management. Global assessment report on disaster

  • Urban MC (2015) Accelerating extinction risk from climate change. Science 348:571–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky A, Dake K (1990) Theories of risk perception: who fears what and why? Daedalus 119:41–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang K, Li Y, Liu H, Xu H, Shen J (2013) Comparison of three methods for estimating the sea level rise effect on storm surge flooding. Clim Chang 118:487–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

All authors thank all those that participated in this study. MM, KM, JXL and VMA acknowledge support from the Australian Research Council. The authors are grateful for funding from ARC SuperScience grants #FS100100024 and #FS110200005 and funding from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions. Many thanks also to John Cook, Kelly Fielding, Hugh Possingham and Lana Friesen from the University of Queensland and Tiffany Morrison from JCU for discussion and reviewing drafts of the survey questionnaire and Abdollah Asadzadeh Jarihani and Scott Atkinson for helping collect the elevation data for the objective risk maps.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Morena Mills.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 33 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mills, M., Mutafoglu, K., Adams, V.M. et al. Perceived and projected flood risk and adaptation in coastal Southeast Queensland, Australia. Climatic Change 136, 523–537 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1644-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1644-y

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Justine Bell