The National Climate Assessment’s ability to support decision-making partly relies on engaging stakeholders throughout the assessment process. The guiding vision for the Third National Climate Assessment (NCA3) was for an inclusive, broad-based, and sustained process attentive to both the conduct of assessments and communication of findings. Such a process promotes dialogue between scientific experts, stakeholders, and decision-makers about what is important in a particular region or sector, the potential impacts of climate change, and possible responses. We sought to create actionable research and assessment products widely perceived as credible, salient, and legitimate. The process also sought to build capacity to conduct sustained assessments and use climate change information in decision-making processes. Here we describe how we pursued this stakeholder engagement vision during the planning, development, and release of NCA3. Through repeated opportunities for stakeholder. input, we ensured process transparency and inclusiveness in the framing of assessment and built human capital. We also increased connectivity among stakeholder organizations. By cultivating a network of collaborators who connected the NCA to other networks, the NCA3 engagement process laid the groundwork for a sustained assessment - which is envisaged to transition the traditional quadrennial assessment approach into a more dynamic and adaptive assessment process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
The NCADAC charter is available at http://downloads.globalchange.gov/nca/NCADAC/NCADAC_Charter_6-24-13.pdf.
This working group was also charged to focus on how to design and embed ongoing evaluation of the entire NCA process into the assessment process, until the topic was deemed to deserve its own working group. Evaluation was eventually included as a recommendation in the sustained assessment special report (Buizer et al. 2013).
More information about INCA is available from http://www.globalchange.gov/about/iwgs#INCA.
All workshops described and outputs archived at http://www.globalchange.gov/engage/process-products/NCA3/workshops.
Author teams were responsible for deciding whether cited source material met information quality standards. NCADAC-developed guidance for assuring information quality is available from http://www.globalchange.gov/sites/globalchange/files/NCADAC-Nov2011-Information-Quality-Principles.pdf.
More information about the composition and operation of NCAnet at http://ncanet.usgcrp.gov.
All town halls and related materials available at http://www.globalchange.gov/engage/process-products/NCA3/workshops#Town Halls.
The stakeholder event is archived at http://www.c-span.org/video/?319224-2/white-house-unveils-climate-assessment-report.
Adams P, Steeves J, Ashe B, Firth J, Rabb B (2014) Climate risks study for telecommunications and data center services, Report prepared for the General Services Administration. https://sftool.gov/Content/attachments/GSA%20Climate%20Risks%20Study%20for%20Telecommunications%20and%20Data%20Center%20Services%20-%20FINAL%20October%202014.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2015
Allegheny Highlands Climate Change Impacts Initiative (2015) On the chopping block: the impacts of global warming and climate change on the mid-atlantic allegheny highlands. http://www.alleghenyclimate.org/documents/Updated%201-19-15%20OTCB%20Report.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2015
Bathke DJ, Oglesby RJ, Rowe CM, Wilhite DA (2014) Understanding and assessing climate change: Implications for Nebraska. http://snr.unl.edu/download/research/projects/climateimpacts/2014ClimateChange.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2015
Boykoff MT (2015) 2000–2015 United States newspaper coverage of climate change or global warming (Updated Through May 2015). http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/media_coverage/us/index.html. Accessed 3 June 2015
Buizer JL, Fleming P, Hays SL, Dow K, Field CB, et al. (2013) Report on preparing the nation for change: Building a sustained National Climate Assessment process. http://downloads.globalchange.gov/nca/NCADAC/NCADAC_Sustained_Assessment_Special_Report_Sept2013.pdf. Accessed 11 May 2015
Buizer JL, Dow K, Black ME, Jacobs KL, Waple A, Moss RH, Moser S, Gustafson DI, Richmond TC, Hays SL, Field CB (2015) Building a sustained climate assessment process. Climatic Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-015-1501-4
CCSP (2003) Strategic plan for the U.S. Climate Change Science Program. http://data.globalchange.gov/assets/2a/42/f55760db8a810e1fba12c67654dc/ccsp-strategic-plan-2003.pdf. Accessed 15 October 2015
Dilling L, Lemos MC (2011) Creating usable science: opportunities and constraints for climate knowledge use and their implications for science policy. Glob Environ Chang 21:680–698
Ekwurzel B, Frumhoff PC, McCarthy JJ (2011) Climate uncertainties and their disconents: increasing the impact of assessments on public understanding of climate risks and choices. Clim Chang 108:791–802
Farrell AE, Jäger J, VanDeever SD (2006) Overview: Understanding design choices. In: Farrell AE, Jäger J (eds) Assessments of regional and global environmental risks: designing processes for the effective use of science in decision making. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, pp. 1–24
Garfin G, Jardine A (2013) Overview. In: Garfin G, Jardine A, Merideth R, Black M, LeRoy S (eds) Assessment of climate change in the southwest United States. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. 21–36
Hauser R, Jadin J (2012) Rural communities workshop. Technical report. http://downloads.globalchange.gov/nca/technical_inputs/rural-communities-workshop-technical-input.pdf. Accessed 7 May 2015
IPCC (2014) climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva
Jäger J, Farrell AE (2006) Improving the practice of environmental assessment. In: Farrell AE, Jäger J (eds) Assessments of regional and global environmental risks: designing processes for the effective use of science in decision making. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, pp. 278–293
Jacobs KL, Buizer JL (2015) Building community, credibility and knowledge: the third US National Climate Assessment. Climatic Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-015-1445-8
Karl TR, Melillo JM, Peterson TC (eds) (2009) Global climate change impacts in the United States. Cambridge University Press, New York
Keller AC (2010) Credibility and relevance in environmental policy: measuring strategies and performance among science assessment organizations. J Public Adm Res Theory 20:357–386
Kenney MA, Janetos AC (2015) Building an integrated national climate indicator system. Climatic Change (this issue)
Keystone Center (2012) Final report and lessons learned: the climate conversations project. Submitted to The Energy Foundation. The Keystone Center, Washington, DC. https://www.keystone.org/policy-initiatives-center-for-science-a-public-policy/environment/climate-conversations.html. Accessed 3 June 2015
Maibach E, Cobb S, Leiserowitz A, Peters E, Schweizer V, et al. (2011) A national survey of television meteorologists about climate change education. Center for climate change communication. George Mason University, Fairfax VA
McNie EC (2007) Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature. Environ Sci Pol 10:17–38
Melillo JM, Richmond TC, Yohe GW (eds) (2014a) Climate change impacts in the United States: the Third National Climate Assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC http://nca2014.globalchange.gov/. Accessed 3 June 2015
Melillo JM, Richmond TC, Yohe GW (2014b) Appendix 1: Report development process. In: Melillo JM, Richmond TC, Yohe GW (eds) Climate change impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, pp. 727–732
Morgan MG, Cantor R, Clark WC, Fisher A, Jacoby HD, et al. (2005) Learning from the U.S. national assessment of climate change impacts. Environmental Science & Technology 39:9023–9032
Moser SC (2005) Stakeholder involvement in the first U.S. national assessment of the potential consequences of climate variability and change: an evaluation, finally. http://www.susannemoser.com/documents/Moser_Draft_2-6-05.pdf. Accessed 6 June 2014
Moser SC, Berzonsky C (2015) There must be more: Communication to close the cultural divide. In: O’Brien K, Selboe E (eds) Culture and the adaptive challenge of climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 287–310
Moss RH (2015) Assessing decision support systems and levels of confidence to narrow the climate information “usability gap”. Climatic Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-015-1549-1
Moss R, Scarlett PL, Kenney MA, Kunreuther H, Lempert R, et al. (2014) Decision support: Connecting science, risk perception, and decisions. In: Melillo JM, Richmond TC, Yohe GW (eds) Climate change impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, pp. 620–647
National Research Council (NRC) (2007a) Analysis of global change assessments: lessons learned. National Academies Press, Washington, DC
NOAA, NCAnet Education Affinity Group, and CLEAN Network (2014) National Climate Assessment (NCA) teaching resources. http://wwwclimategov/teaching/2014-national-climate-assessment-resources-educators Accessed 3 June 2015
NRC (2007b) Evaluating progress of the US Climate Change Science Program. National Academies Press, Washington, DC
NRC (2008) Public participation in environmental assessment and decision making. National Academies Press, Washington, DC
NRC (2010a) Advancing the science of climate change. National Academies Press, Washington, DC
NRC (2010b) Informing effective responses to climate change. National Academies Press, Washington, DC
NCADAC (2011a) National Climate Assessment: interim strategy – summary. http://wwwglobalchangegov/sites/globalchange/files/NCADAC-May2011-Interim-Strategypdf Accessed 4 May 2015
NCADAC (2011b) National Climate Assessment (NCA) engagement strategy. http://downloads.globalchange.gov/nca/nca-engagement-strategy_5-20-11.pdf. Accessed 4 May 2015
NCAnet (2014) Workshop on building capacity for engagement around the Third National Climate Assessment Report. http://ncanetusgcrpgov/partners/calendar/nca3-engagement-workshop Accessed 10 May 2015
Parson EA, Corell RW, Barron EJ, Burkett V, Janetos A, et al. (2003) Understanding climatic impacts, vulnerabilities, and adaptation in the United States: building a capacity for assessment. Clim Chang 57:9–42
Risky Business Project (2014) Risky business: the economic risks of climate change in the United States. http://riskybusinessorg/uploads/files/RiskyBusiness_Report_WEB_09_08_14pdf Accessed 10 May 2015
Tassel S (2015) Weather we don’t recognize: How climate change is affecting the Midwest’s weather and how communities are responding. Island Press, Washington, DC
USGCRP (2010a) Strategic planning workshop. http://dataglobalchangegov/assets/46/90/493c479d7145a7087a0292919c04/strategic-planning-workshop-reportpdf Accessed 15 October 2015
USGCRP (2010b) Planning regional and sectoral assessments for the National Climate Assessment. http://data.globalchange.gov/assets/aa/bb/1bc8653ec0e21745a9a1584a7679/regional-sectoral-workshop-report.pdf. Accessed 15 October 2015
USGCRP (2011a) Comments received. http://downloadsglobalchangegov/nca/nca_frn-sep_comments_compiled_2-7-11-posting-xls Accessed 11 May 2015
USGCRP (2011b) Supplement to: Request for information: technical inputs and assessment capacity on topics related to 2013 U.S. National Climate Assessment. http://www.globalchange.gov/sites/globalchange/files/nca-rfi-supplement_7-11.pdf Accessed 11 May 2015
USGCRP (2014a) Comments received on public draft Third National Climate Assessment. http://wwwglobalchangegov/sites/globalchange/files/NCA3-Public-Commentspdf Accessed 11 May 2015
USGCRP (2014b) Frameworks for evaluating the National Climate Assessment: workshop report. http://downloadsglobalchangegov/nca/workshop-reports/NCA-Evaluation-Frameworks-Workshop-Report-2014-finalpdf Accessed 11 May 2015
USGCRP (2015) First National Climate Assessment 1997–2000. http://wwwglobalchangegov/engage/process-products/NCA1 Accessed 4 May 2015
This article is part of a special issue on “The National Climate Assessment: Innovations in Science and Engagement” edited by Katharine Jacobs, Susanne Moser, and James Buizer.
About this article
Cite this article
Cloyd, E., Moser, S.C., Maibach, E. et al. Engagement in the Third U.S. National Climate Assessment: commitment, capacity, and communication for impact. Climatic Change 135, 39–54 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1568-y
- Stakeholder Engagement
- Sustained Assessment
- Stakeholder Involvement
- Engagement Strategy
- Engagement Process