Climatic Change

, Volume 133, Issue 3, pp 469–480

Justice for climate loss and damage

Article

DOI: 10.1007/s10584-015-1483-2

Cite this article as:
Wallimann-Helmer, I. Climatic Change (2015) 133: 469. doi:10.1007/s10584-015-1483-2

Abstract

This paper suggests a way to elaborate the ethical implications of the Warsaw International Mechanism (WIM) as decided at COP 19 from the perspective of justice. It advocates three proposals. First, in order to fully understand the responsibilities and liabilities implied in the WIM, adaptation needs to be distinguished from loss and damage (L&D) on the basis of the different goals which should be attributed to adaptation and to L&D approaches. Second, the primary concern of the WIM should be compensatory justice. In case of climate L&D, three aspects of compensatory justice should be kept separate: corrective liability, remedial responsibility, and with regard to the resources available, fair remedy. Third, it is crucial to distinguish between recoverable damage and irrecoverable or at least not fully recoverable loss. This distinction is crucial because it informs the principles of fair remedy and because damage and loss may differ in their relevance for the stability and functioning of a human system.

Abbreviations

L&D

Loss and Damage

WIM

Warsaw International Mechanism

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Priority Program for EthicsUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations