Advertisement

Climatic Change

, Volume 135, Issue 1, pp 173–186 | Cite as

U.S. National climate assessment gaps and research needs: overview, the economy and the international context

  • Diana LivermanEmail author
Article

Abstract

A number of knowledge gaps and research priorities emerged during the third US National Climate Assessment (NCA3). Several are also gaps in the latest IPCC WG2 report. These omissions reflect major gaps in the underlying research base from which these assessments draw. These include the challenge of estimating the costs and benefits of climate change impacts and responses to climate change and the need for research on climate impacts on important sectors such as manufacturing and services. Climate impacts also need to be assessed within an international context in an increasingly connected and globalized world. Climate change is being experienced not only through changes within a locality but also through the impacts of climate change in other regions connected through trade, prices, and commodity chains, migratory species, human mobility and networked communications. Also under-researched are the connections and tradeoffs between responses to climate change at or across different scales, especially between adaptation and mitigation or between climate responses and other environmental and social policies. This paper discusses some of these research priorities, illustrating their significance through analysis of economic and international connections and case studies of responses to climate change. It also critically reflects on the process of developing research needs as part of the assessment process.

Keywords

Supply Chain Gross Domestic Product Climate Impact Sustained Assessment Commodity Chain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank her co-authors on Chapter 29 on Research Needs for Climate and Global Change of the National Climate Assessment including Robert Corell, Kirstin Dow, Kristie Ebi, Ken Kunkel, Linda Mearns and Jerry Melillo; Amy Glasmeier for conversations about the structure of the US Economy; and sponsors of research on drought and climate impacts including NSF EASM award 1243125, the NOAA IRAP grant to the University of Arizona and the Guggenheim Foundation.

References

  1. Abe M, Ye L (2013) Building Resilient Supply Chains against Natural Disasters: The Cases of Japan and Thailand Global Business Review 14:567-586Google Scholar
  2. Agrawal A, Lemos MC, Orlove B, Ribot J (2012) Cool heads for a hot world – Social sciences under a changing sky. Glob Environ Chang 22:329–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amado J-C, Adams P, Coleman H, Schuchard R (2013) PREP, Value Chain Climate Resilience. Acclimatise, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderegg WR, Prall JW, Harold J, Schneider SH (2010) Expert credibility in climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:12107–12109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arent DJ and Tol RSJ (2014) Key Economic Sectors and Services. In: Field CB, V.R. Barros, D.J. Dokken, K.J. Mach, M.D. Mastrandrea, T.E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K.L. Ebi, Y.O. Estrada, R.C. Genova, B. Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P.R. Mastrandrea, and L.L. White (eds) IPCC Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  6. Aon Benfield (2012) 2011 Thailand Floods Event Recap Report. Aon Benfield AnalyticsGoogle Scholar
  7. Barsugli JJ et al (2013) The practitioner's dilemma: how to assess the credibility of downscaled climate projections. Eos Trans AGU 94(46):424Google Scholar
  8. Berkhout F (2010) Reconstructing boundaries and reason in the climate debate. Glob Environ Chang 20:565–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buizer, J.L., Paul Fleming, Sharon L. Hays, Kirstin Dow, Christopher B. Field, David Gustafson, Amy Luers, and Richard H. Moss, Report on Preparing the Nation for Change: Building a Sustained National Climate Assessment Process, National Climate Assessment and Development Advisory Committee, 2013.Google Scholar
  10. Carey M, James LC, Fuller HA (2014) A new social contract for the IPCC. Nat Clim Change 4:1038–1039. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2442 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Castree N et al (2014) Changing the intellectual climate Nature. Clim Change 4:763–768. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2339 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clapp J (2014) Financialization, distance and global food politics. J Peasant Stud 1–18Google Scholar
  13. Clapp J, Helleiner E (2012) Troubled futures? The global food crisis and the politics of agricultural derivatives regulation. Rev Int Polit Econ 19(2):181–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Corell RW, Liverman D, Dow K, Ebi KL, Kunkel K, Mearns LO, Melillo J (2014) Chapter 29: Research Needs for Climate and Global Change Assessments. In: Melillo JM, Richmond TC, Yohe GW (eds) Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment. U.S. Global Change Research, Program, pp 707–718Google Scholar
  15. Courbage C, Stahel WR eds. (2012) The Geneva Reports- Risk and Insurance Research No. 5 Extreme Events and Insurance 2011. The Geneva Association,Google Scholar
  16. Dell M, Jones BF, Olken BA (2013) What do we learn from the weather? The new climate-economy literature, National Bureau of Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  17. Field CB, V.R. Barros, D.J. Dokken, K.J. Mach, M.D. Mastrandrea, T.E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K.L. Ebi, Y.O. Estrada, R.C. Genova, B. Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P.R. Mastrandrea, and L.L. White (eds) (2014) IPCC Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Global Change Research Program US (2012) The National Global Change Research Plan 2012-2021. A Strategic Plan for the US Global Change Research Program. US Global Change Research Program, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  19. Griggs D (2014) Climate policy: Streamline IPCC reports. Nature 508:171–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grundmann R (2012) The legacy of climategate: revitalizing or undermining climate science and policy? Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 3:281–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hackmann H, Moser SC, Clair ALS (2014) The social heart of global environmental change. Nat Clim Change 4:653–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hall JA, Blair M, Buizer JL, Gustafson DI, Holland B, Moser SC, Waple AM (2014) Chapter 30: Sustained Assessment: A New Vision for Future U.S. Assessments. Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment, U.S. Global Change Research Program. In: Melillo JM, Richmond TC, Yohe GW (eds) Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment. U.S. Global Change Research, Program, pp 719–726Google Scholar
  23. Haraguchi M, Lall U (2013) Flood Risks and Impacts: Future Research Questions and Implication to Private Investment Decision Making for Supply Chain Networks. UNISDR, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  24. Hulme M (2010) Problems with making and governing global kinds of knowledge. Global Environ Chang 20:558–564. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ingram JSI, Ericksen P, Liverman DM (2010) Food security and global environmental change. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Jankó F, Móricz N, Vancsó JP (2014) Reviewing the climate change reviewers: Exploring controversy through report references and citations. Geoforum 56:17–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jarmin RS, Miranda J (2009) The impact of Hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma on business establishments. J Bus Valuation Econ Loss Analys 4(2)Google Scholar
  28. Jasanoff S (2010) Testing time for climate science. Science 328:695–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jira C, Toffel MW (2013) Engaging supply chains in climate change. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 15(4):559–577Google Scholar
  30. Jones N (2013) Climate assessments: 25 years of the IPCC. Nature 501:298–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lahsen M (2013) Climategate: the role of the social sciences. Clim Chang 119:547–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leichenko RM, Thomas A (2012) Coastal cities and regions in a changing climate: economic impacts, risks and vulnerabilities. Geography Compass 6:327–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leichenko R, McDermott M, Bezborodko E, Brady M, Namendorf E (2014) Economic Vulnerability to Climate Change in Coastal New Jersey: A Stakeholder-Based Assessment. J Extreme Events 01(01):1450003. doi: 10.1142/S2345737614500031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lemos MC, Morehouse BJ (2005) The co-production of science and policy in integrated climate assessments. Glob Environ Chang 15:57–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lemos MC, Kirchhoff CJ, Ramprasand V (2012) Narrowing the climate information usability gap. Nat Clim Chang 2:789–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lemos MC, Kirchhoff CJ, Kalafatis SE, Scavia D, Rood RB (2014) Moving Climate Information off the Shelf: Boundary Chains and the Role of RISAs as Adaptive Organizations. Weather, Clim, Soc 6:273–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Linnenluecke MK, Stathakis A, Griffiths A (2011) Firm relocation as adaptive response to climate change and weather extremes. Glob Environ Chang 21(1):123–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Liu J, Hull V, Batistella M, DeFries R, Dietz T, Feng F, Thomas W, Hertel RC, Izaurralde EF, Lambin SL, Luiz A, Martinelli WMC, Emilio F, Moran RN, Ouyang Z, Karen R, Polenske AR, de Miranda G, Rocha CA, Simmons PH, Verburg PV, Zhang F, Zhu C (2013) Framing Sustainability in a Telecoupled World. Ecol Soc 18:26Google Scholar
  39. Mantell N.H., Seneca JJ, Lahr ML, Irving W (2013) The economic and fiscal impacts of Hurricane Sandy in New Jersey Rutgers Regional Report vol Issue Paper 34. Rutgers UniversityGoogle Scholar
  40. Marshall M, Schrank H (2014) Small business disaster recovery: a research framework. Nat Hazards 72:597–616. doi: 10.1007/s11069-013-1025-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Melillo J, Richmond T. and Yohe G (2014) Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment. US Glob Chang Res ProgramGoogle Scholar
  42. National Research Council (1992) Global Environmental Change: Understanding the Human Dimensions. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  43. National Research Council (2007) Analysis of Global Change Assessments: Lessons Learned. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  44. National Research Council (NRC) Committee on America's Climate Choices (2010) Advancing the Science of Climate Change: America's Climate Choices. National Academies PressGoogle Scholar
  45. Peck H (2006) Reconciling supply chain vulnerability, risk and supply chain management. Int J Logist: Res Appl 9(2):127–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rosenzweig C, Solecki W (2014) Hurricane Sandy and adaptation pathways in New York: Lessons from a first-responder city Global Environmental Change (in press)Google Scholar
  47. Schrank H, Marshall M, Hall-Phillips A, Wiatt R, Jones N (2013) Small-business demise and recovery after Katrina: rate of survival and demise. Nat Hazards 65:2353–2374. doi: 10.1007/s11069-012-0480-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shapiro HT et al. (2010) Climate change assessments: Review of the processes and procedures of the IPCC InterAcademy Council, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  49. Smith MH (2013) A Fundamental Approach to Facilities Location Risk Assessment and Its Relevance to Supply Chain Network Design: Using the Thai Floods of 2011 as an Example International Journal of Trade. Econ Finance 4(5):300–3013Google Scholar
  50. Stern PC, Ebi KL, Leichenko R, Olson RS, Steinbruner JD, Lempert R (2013) Managing risk with climate vulnerability science. Nat Clim Chang 3:607–609. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1929 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stocker TF (2013) Adapting the assessments. Nat Geosci 6:7–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Thorpe J, Fennell S (2012) Climate Change Risks and Supply Chain Responsibility. Oxfam International, Oxford UKGoogle Scholar
  53. Tol RS (2011) Regulating knowledge monopolies: the case of the IPCC. Clim Chang 108:827–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. US Bureau of Economic Analysis (2014) GDP by state and sector. http://bea.gov/iTable/index_regional.cfm
  55. US Bureau of Economic Analysis (2015) Industry and GDP. http://bea.gov/industry/
  56. US Bureau of Labor Statistics (2015) Employment by major sector. http://www.bls.gov/emp/ep_table_201.htm
  57. US Department of Commerce (2013) Economic Impact of Hurricane Sandy. U.S. Department of CommerceGoogle Scholar
  58. USGCRP (Global Change Research Program). 1990. US Global Change Research Act (see http://www.globalchange.gov/about/legal-mandate)
  59. Viner D, Howarth C (2014) Practitioners’ work and evidence in IPCC reports. Nat Clim Change 4:848–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Von Braun J, Tadesse G (2012) Global food price volatility and spikes: an overview of costs, causes, and solutions. ZEF Discussion Papers on Development PolicyGoogle Scholar
  61. Weaver C et al (2014) From global change science to action with social sciences. Nat Clim Chang 4:656–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Webb G, Tierney K, Dahlhamer J (2000) Businesses and Disasters: Empirical Patterns and Unanswered Questions. Nat Hazards Rev 1:83–90. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2000)1:2(83) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Whitmarsh L, O'Neill S, Lorenzoni I (2011) Climate change or social change? Debate within, amongst, and beyond disciplines. Environ Planning A 43:258–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wilbanks T and Fernandez S (2012) Climate Change Energy Supply and Use: Technical Report for the U.S. Department of Energy in Support of the National Climate Assessment. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge. Wilbanks T (2012) Climate Change and Infrastructure, Urban Systems and Vulnerability: Technical Report for the U.S. Department of Energy in Support of the National Climate Assessment. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge.Google Scholar
  65. Winkler JA, Thornsbury S, Artavio M, Chmielewski F-M, Kirschke D, Lee S, Liszewska M, Loveridge S, Tan P-N, Zhong S, Andresen JA, Black JR, Kurlus R, Nizalov D, Olynk N, Ustrnul Z, Zavalloni C, Bisanz JM, Bujdosó G, Fusina L, Henniges Y, Hilsendegen P, Lar K, Malarzewski L, Moeller T, Murmylo R, Niedzwiedz T, Nizalova O, Prawiranata H, Rothwell N, van Ravensway J, von Witzke H, Woods M (2010) Multi-regional climate change assessments for international market systems with long-term investments: A conceptual framework. Clim Chang 103:445–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Xiao Y, Nilawar U (2013) Winners and losers: analysing post-disaster spatial economic demand shift. Disasters 37:646–668. doi: 10.1111/disa.12025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations