Equality, justice and feasibility: an ethical analysis of the WBGU’s budget approach
- 966 Downloads
According to the Budget Approach proposed by the German Advisory Council on Global Change (WBGU), allocating CO2 emission rights to countries on an equal per-capita basis would provide an ethically justified response to global climate change. In this paper, we will highlight four normative issues which beset the WBGU’s Budget Approach: (1) the approach’s core principle of distributive justice, the principle of equality, and its associated policy of emissions egalitarianism are much more complex than it initially appears; (2) the “official” rationale for determining the size of the budget should be modified in order to avoid implausible normative assumptions about the imposition of permissible intergenerational risks; (3) the approach heavily relies on trade-offs between justice and feasibility which should be stated more explicitly; and (4) part of the approach’s ethical appeal depends on policy instruments which are “detachable” from the approach’s core principle of distributive justice.
KeywordsEmission Trading Historical Responsibility Ethical Point Capita Emission Climate Justice
The authors would like to thank Christian Baatz, Gregor Betz and the editors of the special issue for their comments on earlier versions of this paper. The authors also would like to thank Mercator Stiftung Switzerland and the UFSP Ethik at the University of Zurich for financial support of research without which this paper would not have been possible.
- Betz G (2010) What’s the worst case? The methodology of possibilistic prediction. Anal Krit 32:87–106Google Scholar
- Roser D, Seidel C (2013) Ethik des Klimawandels. Eine Einführung. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, DarmstadtGoogle Scholar
- UNFCCC (1992) United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. New YorkGoogle Scholar
- WBGU (2009) Solving the climate dilemma: The budget approach. Special Report. BerlinGoogle Scholar