Using importers’ windfall savings from oil subsidy reform to enhance international cooperation on climate policies


Fossil fuel subsidy reform would not only decrease consumption, but also lower the world market price of traded fossil energy carriers, in particular oil. As a consequence, oil importers would lower their import bills by more than US$ 30 bn per year. Recycling at least a part of these savings to support low-carbon energy technologies in countries that reduce their subsidies could provide a mechanism to jointly incentivize transformation of the energy system and alter the political economy of subsidy reform.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1


  1. 1.

    With tighter domestic political constraints, a government can threaten to forgo transfer payments that are too low to receive support by domestic constituencies. In this way, it can establish a credible committed to only accept outcomes in which a large share of windfall savings are actually transferred (Putnam 1988).

  2. 2.

    It is of course also conceivable that single countries pay other countries to reduce their fossil fuel subsidies. However, as other countries would also benefit from the reduced world market price for oil and the lower emissions, unilateral action could well be hampered by free-rider incentives and only seems likely to occur if the benefits for a single country are large enough to mandate the costs of paying off subsidizing countries.

  3. 3.

    Note that this number was derived for an oil price of about US$ 110. It seems likely that subsidies and deadweight losses have declined as a result of the recent oil price decline.


  1. Baldwin R (1993) A domino theory of regionalism. NBER Working Papers 4465. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

  2. Barrett S (2005) Environment and statecraft: the strategy of environmental treaty-making. OUP Catalogue 9780199286096. Oxford University Press.

  3. Bowen A (2011) Raising climate finance to support developing country action: some economic considerations. Clim Pol 11(3):1020–1036. doi:10.1080/14693062.2011.582388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Burniaux J-M, Chateau J, Sauvage J (2011) The trade effects of phasing out fossil-fuel consumption subsidies. OECD Publishing.

  5. Carraro C, Massetti E (2012) Beyond Copenhagen: a realistic climate policy in a fragmented world. Clim Chang 110(3–4):523–542. doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0125-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. CIA (2014) “World factbook.”

  7. Clements B, CoadyD, Fabrizio S, Gupta S, Shang B (2014) Energy subsidies: how large are they and how can they be reformed? Econ Energy Environ Policy 3(1). doi:10.5547/2160-5890.3.1.bcle

  8. Coxhead I, Anan W, Nguyen CV (2013) Are carbon taxes good for the poor? A general equilibrium analysis for Vietnam. World Dev 51(0):119–131. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.05.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Davis LW (2013) The Economic cost of global fuel subsidies. NBER Working Papers 19736. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

  10. del Granado A, Javier F, Coady D, Gillingham R (2012) The unequal benefits of fuel subsidies: a review of evidence for developing countries. World Dev 40(11):2234–2248. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Edenhofer O, Jakob M, Creutzig F, Flachsland C, Fuss S, Kowarsch M, Lessmann K, Mattauch L, Siegmeier J, and Steckel JC (2015) Closing the Emission Price Gap. Global environmental change

  12. Friedrichs J, Inderwildi OR (2013) The carbon curse: are fuel rich countries doomed to high CO2 intensities? Energy Pol 62(November):1356–1365. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. GSI (2009) Untold billions: fossil-fuel subsidies, their impacts and the path to reform.

  14. IEA (2011) World energy outlook. Paris

  15. IEA (2013) World Energy Outlook. Paris

  16. IEA (2014) World energy outlook. Paris

  17. IEA, OPEC, OECD, and World Bank (2011) Joint report by IEA, OPEC, OECD and world bank on fossil-fuel and other energy subsidies: an update of the G20 Pittsburgh and Toronto Commitments.

  18. IMF (2013) Energy subsidy reform: lessons and implications.

  19. Jakob M, Steckel JC (2014) How climate change mitigation could harm development in poor countries: how climate change mitigation could harm. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 5(2):161–168. doi:10.1002/wcc.260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jakob M, Steckel JC, Klasen S, Lay J, Grunewald N, Martinez-Zarzoso I, Renner S, Edenhofer O (2014) Feasible mitigation actions in developing countries. Nat Clim Chang 4(11):961–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Keohane RO (1984) After hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton University Press

  22. Koplow D (2009) Measuring energy subsidies using the price-gap approach: what does it leave out?

  23. Maggi, G, Rodriguez-Clare A (2005) A political-economy theory of trade agreements. NBER Working Papers 11716. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

  24. Matar W, Murphy F, Pierru A, Rioux B (2014) Lowering Saudi Arabia’s fuel consumption and energy system costs without increasing end consumer prices. KS-1403-DP02C. KAPSARC Discussion Paper.

  25. Rao ND (2012) Kerosene subsidies in India: when energy policy fails as social policy. Energy Sustain Dev 16(1):35–43. doi:10.1016/j.esd.2011.12.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Regan DH (2006) What are trade agreements for? – two conflicting stories told by economists, with a lesson for lawyers. J Int Econ Law 9(4):951–988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Schwanitz VJ, Franziska P, Christoph B, Gunnar L (2014) Long-term climate policy implications of phasing out fossil fuel subsidies. Energ Policy 67(0):882–894. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.12.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Segal P (2012) How to spend it: resource wealth and the distribution of resource rents. Energ Policy 51(C):340–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sterner T, ed. (2011) Fuel taxes and the poor: the distributional effects of gasoline taxation and their implications for climate policy. Johns Hopkins University Press

  30. Strand, J (2013) Political economy aspects of fuel subsidies: A conceptual framework. policy research working paper series 6392. The World Bank.

  31. UNEP (2008) Reforming energy subsidies. opportunities to contribute to the climate change agenda.

  32. UNFCCC (2010) Decision 1/CP.16.

  33. World Bank (2012) Implementing energy subsidy reforms: evidence from developing countries. doi:10.1596/978-0-8213-9561-5

Download references


We thank Patrick Doupé, Christian Flachsland, Jan Steckel and three anonymous referees for useful comments and suggestions. Funding from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) in the call “Okonomie des Klimawandels” (funding code 01LA11020B/Green Paradox) is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Jakob.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.


(DOCX 26 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jakob, M., Hilaire, J. Using importers’ windfall savings from oil subsidy reform to enhance international cooperation on climate policies. Climatic Change 131, 465–472 (2015).

Download citation


  • Recipient Country
  • World Market Price
  • Deadweight Loss
  • Export Revenue
  • Fossil Fuel Subsidy