In recent years, the field of climate ethics has grown into a truly multidisciplinary endeavor. Climate ethics scholars are pursuing both normative and positive questions about climate change using many different approaches drawn from a wide diversity of disciplinary and theoretical perspectives. Now, the field stands at a multidisciplinary crossroads, delineated in large part by two interrelated considerations: what are the key research questions most in need of multidisciplinary attention and what can be done to move the insights and implications of climate ethics scholarship into real-world climate decision-making. Here, we identify four directions for near-future climate ethics research that we believe are both in need of further examination and likely to be of interest to a diverse coalition of decision-makers working “on the ground”: geoengineering; scope of ethical consideration; responsibility of actors; and, hazards, vulnerabilities and impacts. Regardless of the specific questions they choose to pursue, multidisciplinary climate ethics researchers should strive to conduct accessible and actionable research that both answers the questions decision-makers are already asking as well as helps shape those questions to make decision-making processes more inclusive and ethically-grounded.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
We use the term “geoengineering” as a shorthand to refer to the diverse and ever-growing suite of technologies and other approaches to intentional climate system management that climate scientists, engineers, policymakers and others have begun considering in earnest over the past decade. These include both so-called “solar radiation management” (SRM) and “carbon drawdown and removal” (CDR) strategies. For further discussion see Jamieson (2013).
Aldy JE, Stavins RN (2012) Climate negotiators create an opportunity for scholars. Science 337:1043–1044. doi:10.1126/science.1223836
Böhringer C, Helm C (2008) On the fair division of greenhouse gas abatement cost. Resour Energy Econ 30:260–276
Burns WCG, Strauss L (2013) Climate change geoengineering. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge
Ciscar JC, Saveyn B, Soria A, Szabo L, Van Regemorter D, Van Ierland T (2013) A comparability analysis of global burden sharing GHG reduction scenarios. Energ Policy 55:73–81. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.044
Corner A, Pidgeon N (2015) Like artificial trees? The effect of framing by natural analogy on public perceptions of geoengineering. Clim Chang (this issue). doi:10.1007/s10584-014-1148-6
Cripps E (2013) Climate change and the moral agent: individual duties in an interdependent world. Oxford Univ Press, Oxford
Gardiner SM (2010) Is ‘arming the future’ with geoengineering really the lesser evil? Some doubts about the ethics of intentionally manipulating the climate system. In: Gardiner SM, Caney S, Jamieson D, Shue H (eds) Climate ethics. Essential readings. Oxford Univ Press, New York, pp 284–314
Graham S, Barnett J, Fincher R, Mortreux C, Hurlimann A (2015) Towards fair local outcomes in adaptation to sea-level rise. Clim Chang (this issue). doi:10.1007/s10584-014-1171-7
Grasso M (2010) Justice in Funding adaptation to climate change under the international climate change regime. Springer, Dordrecht
Grasso M, Feola G (2012) Mediterranean agriculture under climate change: adaptive capacity, adaptation, and ethics. Reg Environ Chang 12:607–618. doi:10.1007/s10113-011-0274-1
Guglielmo S, Monroe A, Malle B (2009) At the heart of morality lies folk psychology. Inquiry 52:449–466. doi:10.1080/00201740903302600
Hamilton C (2013) Earthmasters: the dawn of the age of climate engineering. Yale Univ Press, New Haven
Harris LT, Fiske LT (2006) Dehumanizing the lowest of the low: neuroimaging responses to extreme outgroups. Psychol Sci 17:847–853. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01793.x
Heede R (2014) Tracing anthropogenic carbon dioxide and methane emissions to fossil fuel and cement producers. Clim Chang 122(1–2):229–241. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0986-y
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2014). Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the intergovernmental panel on climate change fifth assessment report. http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg2/. Accessed 22 Nov 2014
Jamieson D (1996) Ethics and intentional climate change. Clim Chang 33(3):323–336
Jamieson D (2013) Some whats, whys and worries of geoengineering. Clim Chang 121(3):527–537. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0862-9
Jamieson D (2014) Reason in a dark time: why the struggle to stop climate change failed, and what it means for our future. Oxford Univ Press, New York
Klein RJT, Schipper EL, Dessai S (2005) Integrating mitigation and adaptation into climate and development policy: three research questions. Environ Sci Pol 8(6):579–588. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2005.06.010
Lamb M, Lane M (Forthcoming) Aristotle on the ethics of communicating climate change. In: Heyward C, Reser D (Eds) Climate justice in a non-ideal world. Oxford Univ Press, Oxford
Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, Feinberg G, Rosenthal S, Marlon J (2014a) Climate change in the American mind: Americans’ global warming beliefs and attitudes in November, 2013. Yale University and George Mason University. Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, New Haven
Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, Feinberg G, Rosenthal S (2014b) Public support for climate and energy policies in November 2013. Yale University and George Mason University. Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, New Haven
Markowitz EM (2012) Is climate change an ethical issue? Exploring young adults’ beliefs about climate and morality. Clim Chang 114(3–4):479–495. doi:10.1007/s10584-012-0422-8
Markowitz EM, Shariff A (2012) Climate change and moral judgment. Nat Clim Chang 2:243–247. doi:10.1038/nclimate1378
Mayer B (2015) Conceiving the rationale for international climate law. Clim Chang (this issue). doi:10.1007/s10584-014-1271-4
Nelson DR, Adger WN, Brown K (2007) Adaptation to environmental change: contributions of a resilience framework. Annu Rev Environ Resour 32:395–419
Nolt J (2011) How harmful are the average American’s greenhouse gas emissions? Ethics Policy and Environ 14(1):3–10. doi:10.1080/21550085.2011.561584
Nolt J (2015) Casualties as a moral measure of climate change. Clim Chang. doi:10.1007/s10584-014-1131-2
Palmer C (2011) Does nature matter? The place of nonhuman in the ethics of climate change. In: Arnold DG (ed) The ethics of global climate change. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, pp 272–291
Pielke RA Jr, Prins G, Rayner S, Sarewitz D (2007) Climate change 2007: lifting the taboo on adaptation. Nature 445:597–598. doi:10.1038/445597a
Polling data available at www.pewresearch.org
Preston CJ (ed) (2012) Engineering the climate. The ethics of solar radiation management. Lexington Books, Plymouth
Preston CJ (2015) Framing an ethics of climate management for the anthropocene. Clim Chang (this issue). doi:10.1007/s10584-014-1182-4
Shepherd J (2009) Geoengineering the climate: science, governance and uncertainty. The Royal Society, London
Shue H (1993) Subsistence emissions and luxury emissions. Law Policy 15(1):39–59. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9930.1993.tb00093.x
Tschakert P, Machado M (2012) Gender justice and rights in climate change adaptation: opportunities and pitfalls. Ethics Soc Welf 6(3):275–289. doi:10.1080/17496535.2012.704929
Wade-Benzoni KA, Sondak H, Galinsky AD (2010) Leaving a legacy: intergenerational allocations of benefits and burdens. Bus Ethics Q 20(1):7–34. doi:10.5840/beq20102013
Wilbanks TJ, Kane SM, Leiby PN, Perlack RD, Settle C, Shogren JF, Smith JB (2003) Integrating mitigation and adaptation: possible responses to global climate change. Environ: Sci Policy Sustain Dev. doi:10.1080/00139150309604547
Wood R, Gardiner S, Hartzell-Nichols L (2013) Climatic change special issue: geoengineering research and its limitations. Clim Chang 121(3):427–430. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-1000-4
The authors gratefully acknowledge support from the Center for Interdisciplinary Studies in Economics, Psychology and Social Sciences (CISEPS), Università Milano-Bicocca and from the Chamber of Commerce of Como, Italy. Their financial contribution made it possible to organize the workshop ‘Multidisciplinary perspectives on climate ethics’ (September 26–27, 2013, held in Lake Como, Italy), where many of the concepts discussed in this paper were first developed.
This article is part of a special issue on “Multidisciplinary perspectives on climate ethics” with guest editors Marco Grasso and Ezra M. Markowitz.
About this article
Cite this article
Markowitz, E.M., Grasso, M. & Jamieson, D. Climate ethics at a multidisciplinary crossroads: four directions for future scholarship. Climatic Change 130, 465–474 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1404-4
- Climate Change
- Ethical Consideration
- Adaptive Capacity
- Climate Ethic
- Solar Radiation Management