Advertisement

Climatic Change

, Volume 131, Issue 2, pp 229–243 | Cite as

Regional atmospheric patterns and the delayed sea-ice freeze-up in the western Arctic

  • Thomas J. BallingerEmail author
  • Scott C. Sheridan
Article

Abstract

The western Arctic sea ice cover has dramatically changed since the late 1970s, particularly the timing of the autumn freeze-up. While atmospheric dynamic and thermodynamic processes associated with synoptic-scale weather patterns largely impact the onset of regional ice formation, linkages between the subseasonal occurrences of these patterns, across interannual to multidecadal time scales, and the freeze-up are not well understood. This manuscript takes a synoptic climatological atmospheric pattern (AP) classification approach to evaluate the role of warm season-dominant (i.e., May-October) mean sea-level pressure (MSLP) and 1000–500 hPa thickness APs, derived from daily NCEP/NCAR reanalysis fields, on the passive microwave-derived freeze-up dates for the marginal Beaufort/Chukchi Seas and western Arctic Ocean from 1979 to 2013. Analysis of the respective classifications’ frequencies and their relationships to the freeze-up reveals that approximately one-third of freeze-up variance may be explained by early/middle warm season Beaufort Sea High surface pressure pattern frequency changes. A similar amount of freeze-up variance is explained by the occurrence of mid-warm season dominant thermal patterns, either earlier or later than their predominant season. Both results suggest that pattern changes may be associated with changing ocean–atmosphere heat exchanges affiliated with lengthened periods of melt conditions.

Keywords

Warm Season Atmospheric Pattern Western Arctic Ocean Freeze Date Thickness Pattern 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Jeffrey Miller (NASA Cryospheric Sciences Laboratory/Wyle, Inc.), Stephen Howell (Environment Canada), Mary Haley (NCAR/CISL), and Cameron Lee (Kent State University, Department of Geography) for their assistance with aspects of data acquisition/processing and figure creation.

The NCEP/NCAR reanalysis data is obtained from the NOAA/ESRL Physical Science Division (http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/data/reanalysis/ reanalysis.shtml), while the freeze-up data is acquired from the NASA Cryosphere Science Research Portal (http://neptune.gsfc.nasa.gov/csb/index.php?section=54) with updates for 2012 and 2013 supplied by Jeffrey Miller.

Supplementary material

10584_2015_1383_MOESM1_ESM.docx (24 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 24 kb)
10584_2015_1383_MOESM2_ESM.docx (22 kb)
ESM 2 (DOCX 22 kb)
10584_2015_1383_MOESM3_ESM.docx (24 kb)
ESM 3 (DOCX 24 kb)
10584_2015_1383_MOESM4_ESM.docx (22 kb)
ESM 4 (DOCX 21 kb)
10584_2015_1383_MOESM5_ESM.png (117 kb)
Figure S1 Freeze-up dates for the Beaufort Sea, Chukchi Sea, and Western Arctic Ocean for the 1979-2013 study period (PNG 117 kb)
10584_2015_1383_MOESM6_ESM.png (104 kb)
Figure S2 Same as Figure S1, but for melt onset dates (PNG 103 kb)
10584_2015_1383_MOESM7_ESM.png (455 kb)
Figure S3 Full catalogue of the 15 MSLP patterns (1979-2013) (PNG 455 kb)
10584_2015_1383_MOESM8_ESM.png (293 kb)
Figure S4 Full catalogue of the 15 1000-500 hPa thickness patterns (PNG 293 kb)
10584_2015_1383_MOESM9_ESM.png (89 kb)
Figure S5 Time series of P11 across the warm season months for the Early, Middle, and Late periods described in Figure 3. The frequency represents the total number of days classified for each day (May-October) within each period. A 14-day centered moving average is then applied to smooth the time series across all months (PNG 88 kb)
10584_2015_1383_MOESM10_ESM.png (101 kb)
Figure S6 Time series of T9 across the warm season months for the Early, Middle, and Late periods described in Figure 4. The frequency represents the total number of days classified for each day (May-October) within each period. A 14-day centered moving average is then applied to smooth the time series across all months (PNG 101 kb)

References

  1. Asplin MG, Lukovich JV, Barber DG (2009) Atmospheric forcing of the Beaufort Sea ice gyre: surface pressure climatology and sea ice motion. Journal of Geophysical Research 114: C00A06. doi: 10.1029/2008JC005127
  2. Ballinger TJ, Rogers JC (2013) Atmosphere and ocean impacts on recent western Arctic summer sea ice melt. Geography Compass 7:686–700. doi: 10.1111/gec3.12077 Google Scholar
  3. Ballinger TJ, Rogers JC (2014) Climatic and atmospheric teleconnection indices and western Arctic sea ice variability. Physical Geography 35:459–477. doi: 10.1080/02723646.2014/949338 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ballinger TJ, Sheridan SC (2014) Associations between circulation pattern frequencies and sea ice minima in the western Arctic. International Journal of Climatology 34:1385–1394. doi: 10.1002/joc3767 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ballinger TJ, Sheridan SC, Hanna E (2014) Resolving the Beaufort Sea high using synoptic climatological methods. International Journal of Climatology 34:3312–3319. doi: 10.1002/joc.3907 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belleflamme A, Fettweis X, Erpicum M (2015) Recent summer Arctic atmospheric circulation anomalies in a historical perspective. The Cryosphere 9:53–64. doi: 10.5194/tc-9-53-2015
  7. Bezeau P, Sharp M, Gascon G (2014) Variability in summer anticyclonic circulation over the Canadian Arctic Archipelago and west Greenland in the late 20th/early 21st centuries and its effect on glacier mass balance. International Journal of Climatology, in press. doi:1002/joc.4000.Google Scholar
  8. Candlish LM, Iacozza J, Lukovich JV, Horton B, Barber DG (2014) Sea ice climatology in the Canadian Western Arctic: thermodynamic versus dynamic controls. International Journal of Climatology, in press. doi: 10.1002/joc.4094.
  9. Coleman JSM, Rogers JC (2007) A synoptic climatology of the central United States and associations with Pacific teleconnection pattern frequency. Journal of Climate 20:3485–3497. doi: 10.1175/JCLI4201.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Comiso JC (2012) Large decadal decline of the Arctic multiyear ice cover. Journal of Climate 25:1176–1193. doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00113.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Drobot SD, Maslanik JA (2003) Interannual variability in summer Beaufort Sea ice conditions: Relationship to winter and summer surface and atmospheric variability. Journal of Geophysical Research 108. doi:10.1029/2002JC001537Google Scholar
  12. Fettweis X, Mabille G, Erpicum M, Nicolay S, Van den Broeke M (2011) The 1958–2009 Greenland ice sheet surface melt and the mid-tropospheric atmospheric circulation. Climate Dynamics 36:139–159. doi: 10.1007/s00382-010-0772-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fettweis X, Hanna E, Lang C, Belleflamme A, Erpicum M, Gallée H (2013) Important role of the mid-tropospheric atmospheric circulation in the recent surface melt increase over the Greenland ice sheet. Cryosphere 7:241–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Francis JA, Vavrus SJ (2012) Evidence linking Arctic amplification to extreme weather in mid-latitudes. Geophysical Research Letters 39: L06801. doi:10.1029/2012GL051000Google Scholar
  15. Kalnay E, Kanamitsu M, Kistler R, Collins W, Deaven D, Gandin L, Iredell M, Saha S, White G, Woollen J, Zhu Y, Chelliah M, Ebisuzaki W, Higgins W, Janowiak J, Mo KC, Ropelewski C, Wang J, Leetmaa A, Reynolds R, Jenne R, Joseph D (1996) The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 77:437–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kwok R, Cunningham GF (2010) Contribution of melt in the Beaufort Sea to the decline in Arctic multiyear sea ice coverage: 1993–2009. Geophysical Research Letters 37. doi:10.1029/2010GL044678Google Scholar
  17. Lee CC, Sheridan SC (2012) A six-step approach to developing future synoptic classifications based on GCM output. International Journal of Climatology 32:1792–1802. doi: 10.1002/joc.2394 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Markus T, Stroeve JC, Miller J (2009) Recent changes in Arctic sea ice melt onset, freezeup, and melt season length. Journal of Geophysical Research 114, C12024. doi: 10.1029/2009JC005436 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maslanik J, Drobot S, Fowler C, Emery W, Barry R (2007) On the Arctic climate paradox and the continuing role of atmospheric circulation in affecting sea ice conditions. Geophysical Research Letters 34, L03711. doi: 10.1029/2006GL028269 Google Scholar
  20. Moore GWK (2012) Decadal variability and a recent amplification of the summer Beaufort Sea High. Geophysical Research Letters 39, L10807. doi: 10.1029/2012GL051570 Google Scholar
  21. Mote TL (1998) Mid-tropospheric circulation and surface melt on the Greenland ice sheet. Part II: synoptic climatology. International Journal of Climatology 18:131–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ogi M, Wallace JM (2012) The role of summer surface wind anomalies in summer Arctic sea ice extent in 2010 and 2011. Geophysical Research Letters 39, L09704. doi: 10.1029/2012GL051330 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Overland JE (2009) Meteorology of the Beaufort Sea. Journal of Geophysical Research 114: C00A07. doi: 10.1029/2008JC004861
  24. Overland JE, Francis JA, Hanna E, Wang M (2012) The recent shift in early summer Arctic atmospheric circulation. Geophysical Research Letters 39:L19804. doi:10.1029/2012GL053268Google Scholar
  25. Rogers JC (1978) Meteorological factors affecting interannual variability of summertime ice extent in the Beaufort Sea. Monthly Weather Review 106:890–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Serreze MC, Barrett AP (2011) Characteristics of the Beaufort Sea high. Journal of Climate 24:159–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Serreze MC, Barrett AP, Stroeve JC, Kindig DN, Holland MM (2009) The emergence of surface-based Arctic amplification. Cryosphere 3:11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Simmonds I (2015) Comparing and contrasting the behavior of Arctic and Antarctic sea ice over the 35 year period 1979–2013. Annals of Glaciology 56:18–28. doi: 10.3189/2015AoG69A909 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stroeve JC, Barrett A, Serreze M, Schweiger A (2014a) Using records from submarine, aircraft and satellite to evaluate climate model simulations of Arctic sea ice thickness. The Cryosphere Discussions 8:2179–2212. doi: 10.5194/tcd-8-2179-2014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stroeve JC, Markus T, Boisvert L, Miller J, Barrett A (2014b) Changes in Arctic melt season and implications for sea ice loss. Geophysical Research Letters 41:1216–1225. doi: 10.1002/2013GL058951 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tang Q, Zhang X, Francis JA (2014) Extreme summer weather in northern mid-latitudes linked to a vanishing cryosphere. Nature Climate Change 4:45–50. doi: 10.1038/NCLIMATE2065 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vihma T (2014) Effects of arctic sea ice decline on weather and climate: a review. Surveys in Geophysics 35:1175–1214. doi: 10.1007/s10712-014-9284-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wendler G, Moore B, Galloway K (2014) Strong temperature increase and shrinking sea ice in arctic Alaska. The Open Atmospheric Science Journal 8:7–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wood KR, Overland JE, Salo SA, Bond NA, Williams WJ, Dong X (2013) Is there a “new normal” climate in the Beaufort Sea? Polar Research 32:19552. doi: 10.3402/polar.v32i0.19552 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wu Q, Zhang J, Zhang X, Tao W (2014) Interannual and long-term changes of atmospheric circulation over the Chukchi and Beaufort Seas. Journal of Climate 27:4871–4889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Xia W, Xie H, Changqing K (2014) Assessing trend and variation of Arctic sea-ice extent during 1979–2012 from a latitude perspective of ice edge. Polar Research 33:21249. doi: 10.3402/polar.v33.21249 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yarnal B (1993) Synoptic Climatology in Environmental Analysis: A primer. Belhaven Press, 195 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyKent State UniversityKentUSA

Personalised recommendations