Under the effect of climate change, warming likely means that there will be more water vapour in the atmosphere and extreme storms are expected to occur more frequently and with greater severity, resulting in municipal Intensity-Duration-Frequency (IDF) curves with higher intensities and shorter return periods. A regional climate model, MM5 (the Pennsylvania State University / National Center for Atmospheric Research numerical model), was set up in a one-way, three-domain nested framework to simulate future summer (May to August) precipitation of central Alberta. MM5 is forced with climate data of four Global Climate Models, CGCM3, ECHAM5, CCSM3, and MIROC3.2, for the baseline 1971–2000 and 2011–2100 based on the Special Report on Emissions Scenarios A2, A1B, and B1 of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Due to the bias of MM5’s simulations, a quantile-quantile bias correction method and a regional frequency analysis is applied to derive projected grid-based IDF curves for central Alberta. In addition, future trends of air temperature and precipitable water, which affect storm pattern and intensity, are investigated. Future IDF curves show a wide range of increased intensities especially for storms of short durations (≤1-h). Conversely, future IDF curves are expected to shift upward because of increased air temperature and precipitable water which are projected to be about 2.9 °C and 29 % in average by 2071–2100, respectively. Our results imply that the impact of climate change could increase the future risk of flooding in central Alberta.
Return Period Regional Climate Model Couple Model Intercomparison Project Phase Precipitable Water Extreme Storm
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access
We are grateful to Compute Canada’s WestGrid support staff for their assistance with technical issues of its supercomputers. This research was supported by the City of Edmonton and Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council.
Boé J, Terray L, Habets F, Martin E (2007) Statistical and dynamical downscaling of the Seine basin climate for hydro-meteorological studies. Int J Climatol 27:1643–1655. doi:10.1002/joc.1602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen JH, Christensen OB (2003) Severe summertime flooding in Europe. Nature 421:805–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erfani A, Methot A, Goodson R, Belair S, Yeh K, Cote J, Moffet R (2003) Synoptic and mesoscale study of a severe convective outbreak with the nonhydrostatic global environmental multiscale (GEM) model. Meteorog Atmos Phys 82:31–53. doi:10.1007/s00703-001-0585-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groisman PY, Rankova EY (2001) Precipitation trends over the Russian permafrost-free zone: removing the artifacts of pre-processing. Int J Climatol 21:657–678. doi:10.1002/joc.627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IPCC Fifth Assessment Report: Working Group I (WGI) report (2013) Intergovernmental panel on climate change, Available from http://www.ipcc.ch/.
IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Working Group I (WGI) report (2007) Intergovernmental panel on climate change, Available from http://www.ipcc.ch/.
Johnson F, Sharma A (2011) Accounting for interannual variability: a comparison of options for water resources climate change impact assessments. Water Resour Res 47:W04508. doi:10.1029/2010WR009272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuo CC, Gan TY, Chan S (2013) Regional intensity-duration-frequency curves derived from ensemble empirical mode decomposition and scaling property. J Hydrol Eng 18:66–74. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000612
Kyselý J, Beguería S, Beranová R, Gaál L, López-Moreno JI (2012) Different patterns of climate change scenarios for short-term and multi-day precipitation extremes in the Mediterranean. Glob Planet Chang 98–99:63–72. doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.06.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafon T, Dadson S, Buys G, Prudhomme C (2013) Bias correction of daily precipitation simulated by a regional climate model: a comparison of methods. Int J Climatol 33:1367–1381. doi:10.1002/joc.3518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laprise R, Caya D, Frigon A, Paquin D (2003) Current and perturbed climate as simulated by the second-generation Canadian regional climate model (CRCM-II) over northwestern north America. Clim Dyn 21:405–421. doi:10.1007/s00382-003-0342-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenderink G, Van Meijgaard E (2008) Increase in hourly precipitation extremes beyond expectations from temperature changes. Nat Geosci 1:511–514. doi:10.1038/ngeo262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mailhot A, Beauregard I, Talbot G, Caya D, Biner S (2012) Future changes in intense precipitation over Canada assessed from multi-model NARCCAP ensemble simulations. Int J Climatol 32:1151–1163. doi:10.1002/joc.2343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mlawer EJ, Taubman SJ, Brown PD, Iacono MJ, Clough SA (1997) Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave. J Geophys Res 102:16663–16682. doi:10.1029/97JD00237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisner J, Rasmussen RM, Bruintjes RT (1998) Explicit forecasting of supercooled liquid water in winter storms using the MM5 mesoscale model. Q J R Meteorol Soc 124:1071–1107. doi:10.1002/qj.49712454804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen PK (1968) Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall’s tau. J Am Stat Assoc 63:1379–1389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun F, Roderick ML, Lim WH, Farquhar GD (2011) Hydroclimatic projections for the Murray‐darling basin based on an ensemble derived from intergovernmental panel on climate change AR4 climate models. Water Resour Res 47:W00G02. doi:10.1029/2010WR009829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theil H (1950) A rank-invariant method of linear and polynomial regression analysis. I, II, III. Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen Series A 53: 386–392, 521–525, 1397–1412Google Scholar