Why are climate policies of the present decade so crucial for keeping the 2 °C target credible?
- 1.8k Downloads
Decision-makers have confirmed the long term objective of preventing a temperature increase greater than 2 °C. This paper aims at appraising by means of a cost-benefit analysis whether decision makers’ commitment to meet the 2 °C objective is credible or not. Within the framework of a cost-benefit type integrated assessment model, we consider that the economy faces climate damages with a threshold at 2 °C. We run the model for a broad set of scenarios accounting for the diversity of “worldviews” in the climate debate. For a significant share of scenarios we observe that it is considered optimal to exceed the threshold. Among those “non-compliers” we discriminate ”involuntary non-compliers” who cannot avoid the exceedance due to physical constraint from ”deliberate compliers” for whom the exceedance results from a deliberate costs-benefit analysis. A second result is that the later mitigation efforts begin, the more difficult it becomes to prevent the exceedance. In particular, the number of ”deliberate non-compliers” dramatically increases if mitigation efforts do not start by 2020, and the influx of involuntary non-compliers become overwhelming f efforts are delayed to 2040. In light of these results we argue that the window of opportunity for reaching the 2 °C objective with a credible chance of success is rapidly closing during the present decade. Further delay in finding a climate agreement critically undermines the credibility of the objective.
KeywordsClimate Policy Climate Sensitivity Abatement Cost Damage Function Social Planner
- Cointe B, Ravon P-A, Gurin E (2011) 2 °C: the history of a policy-science nexus. Working Papers IDDRI, n°19/11Google Scholar
- Dasgupta P (2007) Commentary: the Stern review’s economics of climate change. Natl Inst Econ Rev 199 (1): 4–7Google Scholar
- Guivarch C, allegatte S (2012) 2 °C or not 2 °C? Glob Environ Chang 3 (1): 179 –192Google Scholar
- IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: mitigation. Contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Koopmans T (1963) Appendix to on the concept of optimal economic growth. Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers.Google Scholar
- McInerney D, Lempert R, Keller K. (2009) What are robust strategies in the face of uncertain climate threshold responses Clim Chang: 1–22Google Scholar
- Nordhaus W (1994) Managing the global commons: the economics of climate change. MIT Press, Cambridge. MAGoogle Scholar
- Nordhaus W (2008) A question of balance. Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
- Nordhaus W, Boyer J (2003) Warming the world: economic models of global warming. the MIT PressGoogle Scholar
- Stern N (2006) The economics of climate change. The Stern review. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
- Tol R S J (2009) Climate feedbacks on the terrestrial biosphere and the economics of climate policy: an application of fund. Technical Report WP288, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI)Google Scholar