Abstract
Previous research has identified the interaction between political orientation and education as an important predictor of climate change beliefs. Using data from the 2010 General Social Survey, this article looks at the moderating effect of party identification on income in predicting climate change beliefs in the U.S. Probing this interaction reveals that increased income predicts a higher probability of dismissing climate dangers among Republican-leaning individuals when compared with Independents and Democrats. Alternatively, increased income predicts a higher probability of ranking climate change as the most important environmental problem facing the United States among Democratic-leaning individuals compared with Republicans. The results indicate that income only predicts climate change beliefs in the presence of certain political orientations, with poorer Republicans less likely to dismiss climate change dangers than their affluent counterparts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Austin A (2002) Advancing accumulation and managing its discontents: the U.S. Antienvironmental Countermovement. Sociol Spectr 22:71–105
Brechin SR, Kempton W (1994) Global environmentalism: a challenge to the postmaterialism thesis. Soc Sci Q 75:245–269
Büchs M, Bardsley N, Duwe S (2011) Who bears the brunt? Distributional effects of climate change mitigation policies. Crit Soc Policy 31:285–307
Dunlap RE, McCright AM (2008) A widening gap: republican and democratic views on climate change. Environment 50:26–35
Dunlap RE, Mertig AG (1997) Global environmental concern: an anomaly for postmaterialism. Soc Sci Q 78:24–29
Dunlap RE, York R (2008) The globalization of environmental concern and the limits of the postmaterialist values explanation: evidence from four multinational surveys. Sociol Q 49:529–563
Franzen A (2003) Environmental attitudes in international comparison: an analysis of the ISSP surveys 1993 and 2000. Soc Sci Q 84:297–308
Franzen A, Meyer R (2010) Environmental attitudes in cross-national perspective: a multilevel analysis of the ISSP 1993 and 2000. Eur Sociol Rev 26:219–234
Gauchat G (2012) Politicization of science in the public sphere: a study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. Am Sociol Rev 77:167–187
Hamilton LC (2008) Who cares about polar regions? Results from a survey of U.S. Public Opinion. Arct Antarct Alp Res 40:671–678
Hamilton LC (2011) Education, politics and opinions about climate change: evidence for interaction effects. Clim Chang 104:231–242
Hamilton LC, Keim BD (2009) Regional variation in perceptions about climate change. Int J Climatol 29:2348–2352
Hamilton LC, Lemcke-Stampone M (2013) Arctic warming and your weather: public belief in the connection. Int J Climatol. 34(5):1723–1728
Hamilton LC, Cutler MJ, Schaefer A (2012) Public knowledge and concern about polar-region warming. Polar Geogr 35(2):155–168
Hibbard PJ, Tierney S (2011) Carbon control and the economy: economic impacts of RGGI’s first three years. Electr J 24:30–40
Inglehart R (1990) Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Inglehart R (1995) Public support for environmental protection: objective problems and subjective values in 43 societies. PS Polit Sci Polit 28:57–72
Jones BD, Baumgartner FR (2005) The politics of attention: how government prioritizes problems. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Jones RE, Dunlap RE (1992) The social bases of environmental concern: have they changed over time? Rural Sociol 57:28–47
Krosnick JA, Holbrook AL, Visser PS (2000) The impact of the Fall 1997 debate about global warming on American Public Opinion. Public Underst Sci 9:239–260
Leiserowitz A (2005) American risk perception: is climate change dangerous? Risk Anal 25:1433–1442
Leiserowitz A (2006) Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: the role of affect, imagery, and values. Clim Chang 77:45–72
Malka A, Krosnick JA, Langer G (2009) The association of knowledge with concern about global warming: trusted information sources shape public thinking. Risk Anal 29:633–647
McCright AM (2008) The social bases of climate change knowledge, concern, and policy support in the U.S. General Public. Hofstra Law Rev 37:1017–1047
McCright AM (2011) Political orientation moderates Americans’ beliefs and concern about climate change. Clim Chang 104:243–253
McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2000) Challenging global warming as a social problem: an analysis of the conservative movement’s counter-claims. Soc Probl 47:499–522
McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2010) Anti-reflexivity: the American conservative movement’s success in undermining climate science and policy. Theory Cult Soc 27:100–133
McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2011a) The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. Sociol Q 52:155–194
McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2011b) Cool dudes: the denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Glob Environ Chang 21:1163–1172
Mitchell MN (2012) Interpreting and visualizing regression models using Stata. Stata Press, College Station
Mohai P, Bryant B (1998) Is there a “race” effect on concern for environmental quality? Publ Opin Q 62:475–505
Parry IWH (2004) Are emissions permits regressive? J Environ Econ Manag 47:364–387
Van Liere KD, Dunlap RE (1980) The social bases of environmental concern: a review of hypotheses, explanations and empirical evidence. Publ Opin Q 44:181–197
Wood BD, Vedlitz A (2007) Issue definition, information processing, and the politics of global warming. Am J Polit Sci 51:552–568
Acknowledgments
The author thanks Cindy Buckley, Anna Marshall, and three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on earlier drafts of this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bohr, J. Public views on the dangers and importance of climate change: predicting climate change beliefs in the United States through income moderated by party identification. Climatic Change 126, 217–227 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1198-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1198-9