Climatic Change

, Volume 130, Issue 3, pp 359–369 | Cite as

Framing an ethics of climate management for the anthropocene

Article

Abstract

In addition to carbon dioxide, it is becoming increasingly clear that there are numerous other potent agents of anthropogenic forcing (e.g. methane, ozone, black carbon) at work in the climate system today. The typical ethical framing of climate change has not yet accommodated this complexity. In addition, geoengineering has often been presented as a Plan B that would simply counter unintentional (and positive) anthropogenic forcing with intentional (and negative) anthropogenic forcing. This paper attempts to better address the complexity by outlining an ethical framework for reducing all anthropogenic forcing, a position it labels the 'climate imperative.' The paper considers geoengineering alongside various other anthropogenic forcing activities and discusses what the climate imperative would say about each of them. On this analysis, GHG and black carbon reductions remain a priority. At the same time, the framing reveals a significant ethical difference between geoengineering through solar radiation management and through carbon dioxide removal.

Supplementary material

10584_2014_1182_MOESM1_ESM.docx (111 kb)
ESM 1(DOCX 111 kb)

References

  1. Brown M (2012) First test of floating volcano geoengineering project cancelled. Wired Magazine http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012-05/16/geoengineering-cancelled . Accessed 20 May 2014.
  2. Caldeira K (2013) We need some Symptomatic Relief. Earth Island Journal http://www.earthisland.org/journal/index.php/eij/article/caldeira. Accessed 20 May 2014.
  3. Cole D, Yung L (eds) (2010) Beyond naturalness: rethinking park and wilderness stewardship in an era of rapid change. Island Press, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  4. Corbett J, Winebrake J, Green E, Kasibhatla P, Eyring V, Lauer A (2007) Mortality from ship emissions: a global assessment. Environ Sci Technol 41(24):8512–8518Google Scholar
  5. Corner A, Parkhill K, Pidgeon N, Vaughan N (2013) Messing with nature? Exploring public perceptions of geoengineering in the UK Global Environmental Change. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.06.002. Accessed 20 May 2014.
  6. Crutzen P (2006) Albedo enhancement by stratospheric sulfur injections: a contribution to resolve a policy dilemma? Clim Chang 77:211–219Google Scholar
  7. Crutzen P, Stoermer E (2000) The ’Anthropocene’. Global Change Newsl 41:17–18Google Scholar
  8. Dominguez G, Jackson T, Brothers L, Barnett B, Nguyen B, Thiemens M (2008) Discovery and measurement of an isotopically distinct source of sulfate in earth’s atmosphere. PNAS 105(35):12769–12773Google Scholar
  9. Eyring V, Isaksen I, Berntsen T, Collins W, Corbett J, Endresen O, Grainger R, Moldanova J, Schlager HS (2010) Transport impacts on atmosphere and climate: shipping. Atmos Environ 44(37):4735–4771Google Scholar
  10. Gardiner S (2010) Is ’arming the future’ with geoengineering really the lesser evil? In: Gardiner S, Caney S, Jamieson D, Shue H, eds. Climate Ethics: Essential Readings. Oxford University Press: Oxford, pps. 284–312.Google Scholar
  11. Heyward C (2013) Situating and abandoning geoengineering: a typology of five responses to dangerous climate change. PS. Polit Sci Politics 46:23–27Google Scholar
  12. Hecht J (2013) Ships inadvertently fertilise the oceans. New Sci 1084:16Google Scholar
  13. Ito A (2013) Global modeling study of potentially bioavailable iron input from shipboard aerosol sources to the ocean. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 27(1):1–10Google Scholar
  14. Jamieson D (1996) Ethics and intentional climate change. Clim Chang 33:323–336Google Scholar
  15. Keith D (2000/1, Winter) The earth is not yet an artifact. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 25–28.Google Scholar
  16. Keith D, Parson E, Morgan M (2010) Research on global sun block needed now. Nature 463:426–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Laakso A, Partanen A, Kokkola H, Laaksonen A, Lehtinen K, Korhonen H (2012) Stratospheric passenger flights are likely an inefficient geoengineering strategy. Environ Res Lett 7(3):034021Google Scholar
  18. Lauer A, Eyring B, Corbett J, Wang C, Winebrake J (2009) Assessment of near-future policy instruments for oceangoing shipping: Impact on atmospheric aerosol burdens and the earth’s radiation budget. Environ Res Lett 43(15):5592–5598Google Scholar
  19. Marris E (2011) Rambunctious garden: saving nature in a post-wild world. Bloomsbury, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. McKibben B (1989) The end of nature. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Meadowcroft J (2013) Exploring negative territory carbon dioxide removal and climate policy initiatives. Climatic Change. doi: 10.1007/s10584-012-0684-1Google Scholar
  22. Meehl G, Arblaster J, Collins W (2008) Effects of black carbon aerosols on the Indian monsoon. J Clim 21:2869–2882Google Scholar
  23. Mercer A, Keith D, Sharp J (2011) Public understanding of solar radiation management. Environ Res Lett 6:1–9Google Scholar
  24. Metz B, Davidson O, Bosch P, Dave R, Meyer L (eds) (2007) Climate change: mitigation of climate change: contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Mickley L, Leibensperger E, Jacob D, Rind D (2012) Regional warming from aerosol removal over the united states: results from a transient 2010–2050 climate simulation. Atmos Environ 46:545–553Google Scholar
  26. Morrow D (2014) Starting a flood to stop a fire? Some moral constraints on solar radiation management. Ethics, Policy, and Environment (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  27. Morton O (2009) The international maritime organization’s plan to warm the world. Heliophage. http://heliophage.wordpress.com/2009/08/20/the-international-maritime-organisations-plans-to-warm-the-world. Accessed 20 May 2014.
  28. NERC 2009 (Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) and Natural Environment Research Council) Geoengineering Scoping Workshop—Outputs. http://www.epsrc.ac.uk/pages/searchresults.aspx?query=geoengineering. Accessed 20 May 2014.
  29. Olson R (2011) Geoengineering for decision makers. Woodrow Wilson Center Report. http://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/Geoengineering_for_Decision_Makers_0.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2014.
  30. Preston C (2011) Re-thinking the unthinkable: environmental ethics and the presumptive argument against geoengineering. Environ Values 20:457–479Google Scholar
  31. Preston C (2012) Engineering the climate: the ethics of solar radiation management. Lexington Books, LanhamGoogle Scholar
  32. Rolston H III (2012) A new environmental ethics: the next millennium for life on earth. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Royal Society (2009) Geoengineering the climate: Science, governance, and uncertainty http://royalsociety.org/policy/publications/2009/geoengineering–climate. Accessed 20 May 2014.
  34. Scott D (2012) Insurance policy or technological fix: the ethical implications of framing solar radiation management. In: Preston C, ed. Engineering the climate: The ethics of solar radiation management. Lanham, MD: Lexington Press, pps. 113–131.Google Scholar
  35. Shindell D, Kuylenstierna JC, Vignati E, van Dingenen R, Amann M, Klimont Z, Anenberg SC, Muller N, Janssens-Maenhout G, Raes F, Schwartz J, Faluvegi G, Pozzoli L, Kupiainen K, Höglund-Isaksson L, Emberson L, Streets D, Ramanathan V, Hicks K, Oanh KNT, Milly G, Williams M, Demkine V, Fowler D (2012) Simultaneously mitigating near-term climate change and improving human health and food security. Science, 335(6065), 183–189Google Scholar
  36. Simmons J (2010) Ideal and non-ideal theory. Philos Public Aff Q 38(1):5–36Google Scholar
  37. Tavoni M, Socolow R (2013) Clim Change (special issue) 118:1–14Google Scholar
  38. Taylor P (1986) Respect for nature. Princeton, Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  39. UNEP (2011) United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) and World Meteorological Organization (WMO). Integrated Assessment of Black Carbon and Tropospheric Ozone Summary for Decision Makers. http://www.unep.org/dewa/Portals/67/pdf/Black_Carbon.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2014.
  40. UNFCCC. 1992. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. http://unfccc.int/essential_background/convention/background/items/1353.php . Accessed 20 May 2014.
  41. Olson R (2011) Geoengineering for decision makers. Woodrow Wilson Center Report. http://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/Geoengineering_for_Decision_Makers_0.pdf. Accessed 11 October 2013.
  42. Royal Society (2009) Geoengineering the climate: Science, governance, and uncertainty http://royalsociety.org/policy/publications/2009/geoengineering–climate. Accessed 11 October 2013.
  43. UNEP (2011) United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) and World Meteorological Organization (WMO). Integrated Assessment of Black Carbon and Tropospheric Ozone Summary for Decision Makers. http://www.unep.org/dewa/Portals/67/pdf/Black_Carbon.pdf. Accessed 11 October 2013.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy & Program on Ethics and Public AffairsUniversity of MontanaMissoulaMontana

Personalised recommendations