The late founder of this journal, Stephen Schneider, argued that climate scientists must find the right balance between being honest about the limits of our knowledge and being effective in communicating the risks that climate change poses to society. The worlds of science and communications have changed dramatically in the years since Schneider first described this “double ethical bind”. Yet for most scientists, the core challenge of public communication remains. How do we choose between what we perceive as science – being honest – and what we perceive as advocacy – being effective? This essay suggests that scientists should view science and advocacy as opposite ends of a continuum with many possible positions. Drawing upon findings from psychology, communications, and science and technology studies, I describe how scientists can use research and critical self-analysis to be “scientific” about public engagement and to choose a suitable place for themselves on the science-advocacy continuum.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
“Objective”, rather than “positive” (i.e., positivism), is used to describe scientific judgements in order to avoid confusion with other colloquial definitions of positive.
Brysse K, Oreskes N, O’Reilly J, Oppenheimer M (2013) Climate change prediction: erring on the side of least drama? Glob Environ Chang 23:327–337
Fischhoff B (2007) Nonpersuasive communication about matters of greatest urgency: climate change. Env Sci Technol 41:7204–08
Gauchat G (2012) Politicization of science in the public sphere: a study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. Am Socio Rev 77:167–187
Hansen J (2009) Storms of my grandchildren: the truth about the coming climate catastrophe and our last chance to save humanity. Bloomsbury Press, New York
Kahan DM (2010) Fixing the communications failure. Nature 463:296–297
Kahan DM, Peters E, Wittlin M, Slovic P, Ouellette LL, Braman D, Mandel G (2012) The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Clim Change 2:732–735
Lackey RT (2007) Science, scientists, and policy advocacy. Conserv Biol 21:12–17
Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, Smith N (2011) Climate change in the American mind: Americans’ global warming beliefs and attitudes in May 2011. Yale University, New Haven
Markowitz EM, Shariff AF (2012) Climate change and moral judgement. Nature Clim Change 2:243–247
Meyer JL, Frumhoff HC, Hamburg SP, de la Rosa C (2010) Above the din but in the fray: environmental scientists as effective advocates. Fron Ecol Env 8:299–305
Moser SC, Dilling LR (2011) Communicating climate change: closing the science-action gap. In: Dryzek JS, Norgaard RB, Schlosberg D (eds) The oxford handbook of climate change and society. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 161–174
Nelson MP, Vucetich JA (2009) On advocacy by environmental scientists: what, whether, why, and how. Conserv Biol 23:1090–1101
Nisbet MC (2009) Communicating climate change: why frames matter for public engagement. Environment 51:12–23
Oppenheimer M (2011) What roles can scientists play in public discourse? EOS, Trans AGU 92:133–140
Pielke RA Jr (2007) The honest broker: making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge University Press, New York
Schneider SH (1988) The greenhouse effect and the U.S. summer of 1988: cause and effect or a media event: an editorial. Clim Change 13:113–115
Schneider SH (2000) Is the “citizen-scientist” an oxymoron. In: Kleinman D (ed) Beyond the science wars: science, technology and democracy. State University of New York, Albany, pp 102–120
The author would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for very helpful comments. This manuscript is based in part on talks and training sessions prepared for the University of British Columbia’s TerreWEB Program.
About this article
Cite this article
Donner, S.D. Finding your place on the science – advocacy continuum: an editorial essay. Climatic Change 124, 1–8 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1108-1
- Policy Option
- Public Engagement
- Climate Scientist
- Normative Judgement
- Address Climate Change